Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate three-dimensional morphological variation of the occipital bone between sexes and among populations, to determine how ancestry, sex and size account for occipital shape variation and to describe the exact forms by which the differences are expressed.<...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yameng Zhang, Lynne A Schepartz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245445
_version_ 1819001941916647424
author Yameng Zhang
Lynne A Schepartz
author_facet Yameng Zhang
Lynne A Schepartz
author_sort Yameng Zhang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate three-dimensional morphological variation of the occipital bone between sexes and among populations, to determine how ancestry, sex and size account for occipital shape variation and to describe the exact forms by which the differences are expressed.<h4>Methods</h4>CT data for 214 modern crania of Asian, African and European ancestry were compared using 3D geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistics, including principal component analysis, Hotelling's T2 test, multivariate regression, ANOVA, and MANCOVA.<h4>Results</h4>Sex differences in average occipital morphology are only observed in Europeans, with males exhibiting a pronounced inion. Significant ancestral differences are observed among all samples and are shared by males and females. Asian and African crania have smaller biasterionic breadths and flatter clivus angles compared to Europeans. Asian and European crania are similar in their nuchal and occipital plane proportions, nuchal and occipital angles, and lower inion positions compared to Africans. Centroid size significantly differs between sexes and among populations. The overall allometry, while significant, explains little of the shape variation. Larger occipital bones were associated with a more curved occipital plane, a pronounced inion, a narrower biasterionic breadth, a more flexed clivus, and a lower and relatively smaller foramen magnum.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Although significant shape differences were observed among populations, it is not recommended to use occipital morphology in sex or population estimation as both factors explained little of the observed variance. Other factors, relating to function and the environment, are suggested to be greater contributors to occipital variation. For the same reason, it is also not recommended to use the occiput in phylogenetic studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:57:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-01fe771084804f29aa2caef9c798ebb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:57:13Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-01fe771084804f29aa2caef9c798ebb72022-12-21T19:24:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01161e024544510.1371/journal.pone.0245445Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.Yameng ZhangLynne A Schepartz<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate three-dimensional morphological variation of the occipital bone between sexes and among populations, to determine how ancestry, sex and size account for occipital shape variation and to describe the exact forms by which the differences are expressed.<h4>Methods</h4>CT data for 214 modern crania of Asian, African and European ancestry were compared using 3D geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistics, including principal component analysis, Hotelling's T2 test, multivariate regression, ANOVA, and MANCOVA.<h4>Results</h4>Sex differences in average occipital morphology are only observed in Europeans, with males exhibiting a pronounced inion. Significant ancestral differences are observed among all samples and are shared by males and females. Asian and African crania have smaller biasterionic breadths and flatter clivus angles compared to Europeans. Asian and European crania are similar in their nuchal and occipital plane proportions, nuchal and occipital angles, and lower inion positions compared to Africans. Centroid size significantly differs between sexes and among populations. The overall allometry, while significant, explains little of the shape variation. Larger occipital bones were associated with a more curved occipital plane, a pronounced inion, a narrower biasterionic breadth, a more flexed clivus, and a lower and relatively smaller foramen magnum.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Although significant shape differences were observed among populations, it is not recommended to use occipital morphology in sex or population estimation as both factors explained little of the observed variance. Other factors, relating to function and the environment, are suggested to be greater contributors to occipital variation. For the same reason, it is also not recommended to use the occiput in phylogenetic studies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245445
spellingShingle Yameng Zhang
Lynne A Schepartz
Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
PLoS ONE
title Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
title_full Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
title_fullStr Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
title_short Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation.
title_sort three dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245445
work_keys_str_mv AT yamengzhang threedimensionalgeometricmorphometricstudiesofmodernhumanoccipitalvariation
AT lynneaschepartz threedimensionalgeometricmorphometricstudiesofmodernhumanoccipitalvariation