Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?

Background: Soldiers’ perception of leadership during military deployment has gained research attention as a potentially modifiable factor to buffer against the development of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Within nonmilitary research, the organizational justice (OJ) framework...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas F. Elrond, Annie Høgh, Søren B. Andersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1449558
_version_ 1797954561973944320
author Andreas F. Elrond
Annie Høgh
Søren B. Andersen
author_facet Andreas F. Elrond
Annie Høgh
Søren B. Andersen
author_sort Andreas F. Elrond
collection DOAJ
description Background: Soldiers’ perception of leadership during military deployment has gained research attention as a potentially modifiable factor to buffer against the development of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Within nonmilitary research, the organizational justice (OJ) framework, i.e. distributive justice, procedural justice (PJ) and interactional justice (IJ), has been found to relate to mental health outcomes. Aspects of OJ may, therefore, be protective against PTSD. Objectives: We examined the prospective relationship between aspects of OJ, namely the perceptions of PJ and IJ by subordinate soldiers without leadership obligations in relationship to immediate superiors and PTSD. Method: Participants were soldiers (n = 245) deployed to Helmand Province in Afghanistan in 2009. Logistic regression procedures were used. The primary analysis measured PTSD cases using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis-I Disorder (SCID) 2½ years after homecoming. PJ/IJ was measured during deployment with a 6-item composite measure ranging from 0 to 12. Supplementary primary analyses were performed with PJ/IJ measured before and immediately after deployment. A secondary PJ/IJ analysis also tested against four postdeployment measures with the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Civilian (PCL-C) dichotomized at screening symptom levels. Results: Higher levels of perceived PJ/IJ for soldiers without leadership obligations during deployment had a prospective relation (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.98) with PTSD on the SCID 2½ years after homecoming after adjustment for factors including predeployment PTSD symptoms, trauma and combat exposure, and state affectivity. Similar results were found by measuring PJ/IJ before (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71–0.95) but not immediately after homecoming (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85–1.11). A relationship with PTSD symptoms at the screening level at the four measurements of PCL-C was found, but only when predeployment PTSD symptoms were not controlled for. Conclusions: These results suggest that PJ/IJ exercised by superiors in relation to military deployments may protect subordinate soldiers against the development of postdeployment PTSD.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:19:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0203900652cb4b93a532028381e74d6b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2000-8066
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:19:24Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series European Journal of Psychotraumatology
spelling doaj.art-0203900652cb4b93a532028381e74d6b2023-01-12T15:31:29ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology2000-80662018-01-019110.1080/20008198.2018.14495581449558Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?Andreas F. Elrond0Annie Høgh1Søren B. Andersen2The Danish Veteran CentreUniversity of CopenhagenThe Danish Veteran CentreBackground: Soldiers’ perception of leadership during military deployment has gained research attention as a potentially modifiable factor to buffer against the development of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Within nonmilitary research, the organizational justice (OJ) framework, i.e. distributive justice, procedural justice (PJ) and interactional justice (IJ), has been found to relate to mental health outcomes. Aspects of OJ may, therefore, be protective against PTSD. Objectives: We examined the prospective relationship between aspects of OJ, namely the perceptions of PJ and IJ by subordinate soldiers without leadership obligations in relationship to immediate superiors and PTSD. Method: Participants were soldiers (n = 245) deployed to Helmand Province in Afghanistan in 2009. Logistic regression procedures were used. The primary analysis measured PTSD cases using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis-I Disorder (SCID) 2½ years after homecoming. PJ/IJ was measured during deployment with a 6-item composite measure ranging from 0 to 12. Supplementary primary analyses were performed with PJ/IJ measured before and immediately after deployment. A secondary PJ/IJ analysis also tested against four postdeployment measures with the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Civilian (PCL-C) dichotomized at screening symptom levels. Results: Higher levels of perceived PJ/IJ for soldiers without leadership obligations during deployment had a prospective relation (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.98) with PTSD on the SCID 2½ years after homecoming after adjustment for factors including predeployment PTSD symptoms, trauma and combat exposure, and state affectivity. Similar results were found by measuring PJ/IJ before (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71–0.95) but not immediately after homecoming (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85–1.11). A relationship with PTSD symptoms at the screening level at the four measurements of PCL-C was found, but only when predeployment PTSD symptoms were not controlled for. Conclusions: These results suggest that PJ/IJ exercised by superiors in relation to military deployments may protect subordinate soldiers against the development of postdeployment PTSD.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1449558traumatic stressmilitary deploymentperception of leadershipprocedural justiceinteractional justicealarm system perspective
spellingShingle Andreas F. Elrond
Annie Høgh
Søren B. Andersen
Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
traumatic stress
military deployment
perception of leadership
procedural justice
interactional justice
alarm system perspective
title Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_full Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_fullStr Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_full_unstemmed Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_short Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_sort leadership and post traumatic stress disorder are soldiers perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective
topic traumatic stress
military deployment
perception of leadership
procedural justice
interactional justice
alarm system perspective
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1449558
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasfelrond leadershipandposttraumaticstressdisorderaresoldiersperceptionsoforganizationaljusticeduringdeploymentprotective
AT anniehøgh leadershipandposttraumaticstressdisorderaresoldiersperceptionsoforganizationaljusticeduringdeploymentprotective
AT sørenbandersen leadershipandposttraumaticstressdisorderaresoldiersperceptionsoforganizationaljusticeduringdeploymentprotective