Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
Objective: To compare the anesthetic performances of 3% prilocaine and 4% articaine when used for the extraction of the maxillary teeth. Materials and Methods: Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group one received a...
Main Author: | Giath Gazal |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2020;volume=14;issue=3;spage=297;epage=301;aulast=Gazal |
Similar Items
-
Comparative clinical evaluation of two different techniques of local anaesthesia in the posterior mandible using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline
by: Marjanović Uroš, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Lingual supplementation may not be required after articaine buccal infiltration anesthesia for lower molar extraction: A clinical comparative study
by: Omer Waleed Majid, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
The Use of Lidocaine and Prilocaine in Dental Surgery. A Review
by: Shahrooz Shafaifard, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Buffered 2% articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular molars: a randomized triple-blind clinical trial
by: Sandro Alexander Lévano LOAYZA, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
How Safe is Prilocaine as a Local Anesthetic in Children Younger Than 2 Years of Age: A Case Series
by: Merve Güllü, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)