Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection

Abstract An ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) of 20 anthelmintic drugs followed and detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been developed, optimized, and validated. The parameters affecting the anthelmintic extraction efficienci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebagamang Tshepho, Simiso Dube, Mathew M. Nindi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Series:Food Science & Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3568
_version_ 1797662493180428288
author Rebagamang Tshepho
Simiso Dube
Mathew M. Nindi
author_facet Rebagamang Tshepho
Simiso Dube
Mathew M. Nindi
author_sort Rebagamang Tshepho
collection DOAJ
description Abstract An ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) of 20 anthelmintic drugs followed and detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been developed, optimized, and validated. The parameters affecting the anthelmintic extraction efficiencies such as selection of extraction solvent (ionic liquids), selection of disperser solvent, volume of extraction solvent, volume of disperser solvent, pH of the aqueous phase, extraction time, salt addition, and centrifugation time were optimized. Validation was conducted according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021. Validation parameters such as calibration function, matrix effect, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), decision limit (CCα), accuracy, and precision were established. Coefficient of determination (R2) values ranging from .99938 to .99995 were obtained using the matrix calibration curve spiked at 0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 times MRL. The LODs and LOQs were calculated using the standard deviation of the response and the slopes of the calibration curves ranged from 0.35 to 26.1 μg/kg and from 1.2 to 87.0 μg/kg, respectively, and were dependent on calibration range. The CCα values ranged from 23 to 1022.0 μg/kg and are also dependent on the MRL concentration levels. The coefficient of variation (CV) values calculated are within the reproducibility range of 16%–30% adapted from the Horwitz Equation CV = 2(1–0.5 log C) and ranged from 1.7% to 16.9%. The developed and validated and the standard QuEChERS method were compared. The IL‐DLLME LC–MS/MS method was applied to 32 small stock (18 caprine [goat] and 14 ovine [sheep]) liver samples received from municipal abattoirs at Botswana National Veterinary Laboratory for the analysis of anthelmintic drug residues. The results obtained indicated that the anthelmintic drug residues were all below the detection capability, and therefore, the samples were passed as fit for human consumption.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T19:00:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-020df5f2cdfc45b884d3053660599b49
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-7177
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T19:00:01Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Food Science & Nutrition
spelling doaj.art-020df5f2cdfc45b884d3053660599b492023-10-10T12:30:22ZengWileyFood Science & Nutrition2048-71772023-10-0111106288630210.1002/fsn3.3568Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detectionRebagamang Tshepho0Simiso Dube1Mathew M. Nindi2Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, The Science Campus University of South Africa Roodepoort, Johannesburg South AfricaDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, The Science Campus University of South Africa Roodepoort, Johannesburg South AfricaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability (iNanoWS), The Science Campus, College of Science, Engineering and Technology (CSET) University of South Africa Roodepoort, Johannesburg South AfricaAbstract An ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) of 20 anthelmintic drugs followed and detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) has been developed, optimized, and validated. The parameters affecting the anthelmintic extraction efficiencies such as selection of extraction solvent (ionic liquids), selection of disperser solvent, volume of extraction solvent, volume of disperser solvent, pH of the aqueous phase, extraction time, salt addition, and centrifugation time were optimized. Validation was conducted according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021. Validation parameters such as calibration function, matrix effect, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), decision limit (CCα), accuracy, and precision were established. Coefficient of determination (R2) values ranging from .99938 to .99995 were obtained using the matrix calibration curve spiked at 0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 times MRL. The LODs and LOQs were calculated using the standard deviation of the response and the slopes of the calibration curves ranged from 0.35 to 26.1 μg/kg and from 1.2 to 87.0 μg/kg, respectively, and were dependent on calibration range. The CCα values ranged from 23 to 1022.0 μg/kg and are also dependent on the MRL concentration levels. The coefficient of variation (CV) values calculated are within the reproducibility range of 16%–30% adapted from the Horwitz Equation CV = 2(1–0.5 log C) and ranged from 1.7% to 16.9%. The developed and validated and the standard QuEChERS method were compared. The IL‐DLLME LC–MS/MS method was applied to 32 small stock (18 caprine [goat] and 14 ovine [sheep]) liver samples received from municipal abattoirs at Botswana National Veterinary Laboratory for the analysis of anthelmintic drug residues. The results obtained indicated that the anthelmintic drug residues were all below the detection capability, and therefore, the samples were passed as fit for human consumption.https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3568anthelmintic drugscaprinegreen sample preparationionic liquid‐dispersive liquid–liquid microextractionovine
spellingShingle Rebagamang Tshepho
Simiso Dube
Mathew M. Nindi
Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
Food Science & Nutrition
anthelmintic drugs
caprine
green sample preparation
ionic liquid‐dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
ovine
title Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_full Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_fullStr Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_full_unstemmed Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_short Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small‐stock meat followed by LC‐ESI‐MS/MS detection
title_sort ionic liquid based dispersive liquid liquid microextraction of anthelmintic drug residues in small stock meat followed by lc esi ms ms detection
topic anthelmintic drugs
caprine
green sample preparation
ionic liquid‐dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
ovine
url https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3568
work_keys_str_mv AT rebagamangtshepho ionicliquidbaseddispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionofanthelminticdrugresiduesinsmallstockmeatfollowedbylcesimsmsdetection
AT simisodube ionicliquidbaseddispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionofanthelminticdrugresiduesinsmallstockmeatfollowedbylcesimsmsdetection
AT mathewmnindi ionicliquidbaseddispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionofanthelminticdrugresiduesinsmallstockmeatfollowedbylcesimsmsdetection