The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving
IntroductionDriver distraction has been recognized for a long time as a significant road safety issue. It has been consistently reported that drivers spend considerable time engaged in activities that are secondary to the driving task. The temporary diversion of attention from safety-critical drivin...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139373/full |
| _version_ | 1797853224641757184 |
|---|---|
| author | Sandra Cuentas-Hernandez Xiaomeng Li Mark J. King Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios |
| author_facet | Sandra Cuentas-Hernandez Xiaomeng Li Mark J. King Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios |
| author_sort | Sandra Cuentas-Hernandez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | IntroductionDriver distraction has been recognized for a long time as a significant road safety issue. It has been consistently reported that drivers spend considerable time engaged in activities that are secondary to the driving task. The temporary diversion of attention from safety-critical driving tasks has often been associated with various adverse driving outcomes, from minor driving errors to serious motor vehicle crashes. This study explores the role of the driving context on a driver’s decision to engage in secondary activities non-critical to the driving task.MethodThe study utilises the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) dataset, a complementary dataset derived from the SHRP2 naturalistic dataset, the most extensive naturalistic study to date. An initial exploratory analysis is conducted to identify patterns of secondary task engagements in relation to context variables. Maximum likelihood Chi-square tests were applied to test for differences in engagement between types of driver distraction for the selected contextual variables. Pearson residual graphs were employed as a supplementary method to visually depict the residuals that constitute the chi-square statistic.Lastly, a two-step cluster analysis was conducted to identify common execution scenarios among secondary tasks.ResultsThe exploratory analysis revealed interesting behavioral trends among drivers, with higher engagement rates in left curves compared to right curves, while driving uphill compared to driving downhill, in low-density traffic scenarios compared to high-density traffic scenarios, and during afternoon periods compared to morning periods. Significant differences in engagement were found among secondary tasks in relation to locality, speed, and roadway design. The clustering analysis showed no significant associations between driving scenarios of similar characteristics and the type of secondary activity executed.DiscussionOverall, the findings confirm that the road traffic environment can influence how car drivers engage in distracted driving behavior. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:46:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-020f95fb25374561ab4d44aaaa0d5821 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:46:06Z |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-020f95fb25374561ab4d44aaaa0d58212023-04-03T14:36:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-04-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11393731139373The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while drivingSandra Cuentas-Hernandez0Xiaomeng Li1Mark J. King2Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios3Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios4QUT Faculty of Health, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaQUT Faculty of Health, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaQUT Faculty of Health, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaQUT Faculty of Health, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaDelft Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, NetherlandsIntroductionDriver distraction has been recognized for a long time as a significant road safety issue. It has been consistently reported that drivers spend considerable time engaged in activities that are secondary to the driving task. The temporary diversion of attention from safety-critical driving tasks has often been associated with various adverse driving outcomes, from minor driving errors to serious motor vehicle crashes. This study explores the role of the driving context on a driver’s decision to engage in secondary activities non-critical to the driving task.MethodThe study utilises the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) dataset, a complementary dataset derived from the SHRP2 naturalistic dataset, the most extensive naturalistic study to date. An initial exploratory analysis is conducted to identify patterns of secondary task engagements in relation to context variables. Maximum likelihood Chi-square tests were applied to test for differences in engagement between types of driver distraction for the selected contextual variables. Pearson residual graphs were employed as a supplementary method to visually depict the residuals that constitute the chi-square statistic.Lastly, a two-step cluster analysis was conducted to identify common execution scenarios among secondary tasks.ResultsThe exploratory analysis revealed interesting behavioral trends among drivers, with higher engagement rates in left curves compared to right curves, while driving uphill compared to driving downhill, in low-density traffic scenarios compared to high-density traffic scenarios, and during afternoon periods compared to morning periods. Significant differences in engagement were found among secondary tasks in relation to locality, speed, and roadway design. The clustering analysis showed no significant associations between driving scenarios of similar characteristics and the type of secondary activity executed.DiscussionOverall, the findings confirm that the road traffic environment can influence how car drivers engage in distracted driving behavior.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139373/fulldriver distractionrisky behaviorattentionmultitaskhuman factors |
| spellingShingle | Sandra Cuentas-Hernandez Xiaomeng Li Mark J. King Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving Frontiers in Psychology driver distraction risky behavior attention multitask human factors |
| title | The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving |
| title_full | The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving |
| title_fullStr | The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving |
| title_full_unstemmed | The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving |
| title_short | The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving |
| title_sort | impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving |
| topic | driver distraction risky behavior attention multitask human factors |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139373/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sandracuentashernandez theimpactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT xiaomengli theimpactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT markjking theimpactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT oscaroviedotrespalacios theimpactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT oscaroviedotrespalacios theimpactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT sandracuentashernandez impactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT xiaomengli impactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT markjking impactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT oscaroviedotrespalacios impactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving AT oscaroviedotrespalacios impactofroadtrafficcontextonsecondarytaskengagementwhiledriving |