Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI

This study aimed to facilitate pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI by normalizing MRI intensity of the same tissue type to a similar intensity level. MRI intensity normalization was conducted through dividing MRI by a shading map, which is a smoothed ratio image between MRI and a three-intensity mask. Rega...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuei-Yuan Hou, Hao-Yuan Lu, Ching-Ching Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/5/816
_version_ 1827693604043227136
author Kuei-Yuan Hou
Hao-Yuan Lu
Ching-Ching Yang
author_facet Kuei-Yuan Hou
Hao-Yuan Lu
Ching-Ching Yang
author_sort Kuei-Yuan Hou
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to facilitate pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI by normalizing MRI intensity of the same tissue type to a similar intensity level. MRI intensity normalization was conducted through dividing MRI by a shading map, which is a smoothed ratio image between MRI and a three-intensity mask. Regarding pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI, a conversion model based on a three-layer convolutional neural network was trained and validated. Before MRI intensity normalization, the mean value ± standard deviation of fat tissue in 0.35 T chest MRI was 297 ± 73 (coefficient of variation (CV) = 24.58%), which was 533 ± 91 (CV = 17.07%) in 1.5 T abdominal MRI. The corresponding results were 149 ± 32 (CV = 21.48%) and 148 ± 28 (CV = 18.92%) after intensity normalization. With regards to pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI, the differences in mean values between pseudo-CT and real CT were 3, 15, and 12 HU for soft tissue, fat, and lung/air in 0.35 T chest imaging, respectively, while the corresponding results were 3, 14, and 15 HU in 1.5 T abdominal imaging. Overall, the proposed workflow is reliable in pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI and is more practicable in clinical routine practice compared with deep learning methods, which demand a high level of resources for building a conversion model.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:46:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-021c2756a894478daeca06017ca0c30e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:46:50Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-021c2756a894478daeca06017ca0c30e2023-11-21T17:58:58ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182021-04-0111581610.3390/diagnostics11050816Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRIKuei-Yuan Hou0Hao-Yuan Lu1Ching-Ching Yang2Department of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei 106, TaiwanInstitute of Radiological Sciences, Tzu-Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien 970, TaiwanDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, TaiwanThis study aimed to facilitate pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI by normalizing MRI intensity of the same tissue type to a similar intensity level. MRI intensity normalization was conducted through dividing MRI by a shading map, which is a smoothed ratio image between MRI and a three-intensity mask. Regarding pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI, a conversion model based on a three-layer convolutional neural network was trained and validated. Before MRI intensity normalization, the mean value ± standard deviation of fat tissue in 0.35 T chest MRI was 297 ± 73 (coefficient of variation (CV) = 24.58%), which was 533 ± 91 (CV = 17.07%) in 1.5 T abdominal MRI. The corresponding results were 149 ± 32 (CV = 21.48%) and 148 ± 28 (CV = 18.92%) after intensity normalization. With regards to pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI, the differences in mean values between pseudo-CT and real CT were 3, 15, and 12 HU for soft tissue, fat, and lung/air in 0.35 T chest imaging, respectively, while the corresponding results were 3, 14, and 15 HU in 1.5 T abdominal imaging. Overall, the proposed workflow is reliable in pseudo-CT synthesis from MRI and is more practicable in clinical routine practice compared with deep learning methods, which demand a high level of resources for building a conversion model.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/5/816MRI intensity normalizationpseudo-CT synthesisconvolutional neural network
spellingShingle Kuei-Yuan Hou
Hao-Yuan Lu
Ching-Ching Yang
Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI
Diagnostics
MRI intensity normalization
pseudo-CT synthesis
convolutional neural network
title Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI
title_full Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI
title_fullStr Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI
title_full_unstemmed Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI
title_short Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI
title_sort applying mri intensity normalization on non bone tissues to facilitate pseudo ct synthesis from mri
topic MRI intensity normalization
pseudo-CT synthesis
convolutional neural network
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/5/816
work_keys_str_mv AT kueiyuanhou applyingmriintensitynormalizationonnonbonetissuestofacilitatepseudoctsynthesisfrommri
AT haoyuanlu applyingmriintensitynormalizationonnonbonetissuestofacilitatepseudoctsynthesisfrommri
AT chingchingyang applyingmriintensitynormalizationonnonbonetissuestofacilitatepseudoctsynthesisfrommri