The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences

Remarkable 3D flow structures occur at river confluences with small density differences due to differences in sediment concentration or temperature. We explain these by comparing numerical simulations for an idealized confluence with aerial photographs of several river confluences where color differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erik van Rooijen, Erik Mosselman, Kees Sloff, Wim Uijttewaal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3084
_version_ 1797548919107878912
author Erik van Rooijen
Erik Mosselman
Kees Sloff
Wim Uijttewaal
author_facet Erik van Rooijen
Erik Mosselman
Kees Sloff
Wim Uijttewaal
author_sort Erik van Rooijen
collection DOAJ
description Remarkable 3D flow structures occur at river confluences with small density differences due to differences in sediment concentration or temperature. We explain these by comparing numerical simulations for an idealized confluence with aerial photographs of several river confluences where color differences express the pattern of density differences at the surface. We analyzed numerical simulations of the Rio Negro–Solimões confluence near Manaus, Brazil, in more detail. The numerical model of the idealized confluence showed that the dense water flowed under the light water and the light water over the dense water in a spiraling motion, distorting the interface between the two waters. The horizontal part of this interface moves upwards in downstream direction. Constraining of the spiraling motion in a narrow river downstream of the confluence can cause local up- and downwelling near the banks. A mixing layer can develop when the flow velocities of the two tributaries differ, but strong spiraling motion due to the density differences can suppress this development. The aerial photographs and all numerical simulations showed similar density patterns at the water surface. Even small density differences can have a significant impact and hence need to be considered when analyzing and modeling 3D flow at confluences.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:06:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-021c99b9f2a94721aab3bad23e426c9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:06:39Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-021c99b9f2a94721aab3bad23e426c9d2023-11-20T19:39:37ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-11-011211308410.3390/w12113084The Effect of Small Density Differences at River ConfluencesErik van Rooijen0Erik Mosselman1Kees Sloff2Wim Uijttewaal3Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsRemarkable 3D flow structures occur at river confluences with small density differences due to differences in sediment concentration or temperature. We explain these by comparing numerical simulations for an idealized confluence with aerial photographs of several river confluences where color differences express the pattern of density differences at the surface. We analyzed numerical simulations of the Rio Negro–Solimões confluence near Manaus, Brazil, in more detail. The numerical model of the idealized confluence showed that the dense water flowed under the light water and the light water over the dense water in a spiraling motion, distorting the interface between the two waters. The horizontal part of this interface moves upwards in downstream direction. Constraining of the spiraling motion in a narrow river downstream of the confluence can cause local up- and downwelling near the banks. A mixing layer can develop when the flow velocities of the two tributaries differ, but strong spiraling motion due to the density differences can suppress this development. The aerial photographs and all numerical simulations showed similar density patterns at the water surface. Even small density differences can have a significant impact and hence need to be considered when analyzing and modeling 3D flow at confluences.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3084confluencedensity differencestemperature differencessediment concentrationflow patternscoherent structures
spellingShingle Erik van Rooijen
Erik Mosselman
Kees Sloff
Wim Uijttewaal
The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
Water
confluence
density differences
temperature differences
sediment concentration
flow patterns
coherent structures
title The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
title_full The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
title_fullStr The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
title_short The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
title_sort effect of small density differences at river confluences
topic confluence
density differences
temperature differences
sediment concentration
flow patterns
coherent structures
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3084
work_keys_str_mv AT erikvanrooijen theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT erikmosselman theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT keessloff theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT wimuijttewaal theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT erikvanrooijen effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT erikmosselman effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT keessloff effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences
AT wimuijttewaal effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences