The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences
Remarkable 3D flow structures occur at river confluences with small density differences due to differences in sediment concentration or temperature. We explain these by comparing numerical simulations for an idealized confluence with aerial photographs of several river confluences where color differ...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3084 |
_version_ | 1797548919107878912 |
---|---|
author | Erik van Rooijen Erik Mosselman Kees Sloff Wim Uijttewaal |
author_facet | Erik van Rooijen Erik Mosselman Kees Sloff Wim Uijttewaal |
author_sort | Erik van Rooijen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Remarkable 3D flow structures occur at river confluences with small density differences due to differences in sediment concentration or temperature. We explain these by comparing numerical simulations for an idealized confluence with aerial photographs of several river confluences where color differences express the pattern of density differences at the surface. We analyzed numerical simulations of the Rio Negro–Solimões confluence near Manaus, Brazil, in more detail. The numerical model of the idealized confluence showed that the dense water flowed under the light water and the light water over the dense water in a spiraling motion, distorting the interface between the two waters. The horizontal part of this interface moves upwards in downstream direction. Constraining of the spiraling motion in a narrow river downstream of the confluence can cause local up- and downwelling near the banks. A mixing layer can develop when the flow velocities of the two tributaries differ, but strong spiraling motion due to the density differences can suppress this development. The aerial photographs and all numerical simulations showed similar density patterns at the water surface. Even small density differences can have a significant impact and hence need to be considered when analyzing and modeling 3D flow at confluences. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T15:06:39Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-021c99b9f2a94721aab3bad23e426c9d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-4441 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T15:06:39Z |
publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Water |
spelling | doaj.art-021c99b9f2a94721aab3bad23e426c9d2023-11-20T19:39:37ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-11-011211308410.3390/w12113084The Effect of Small Density Differences at River ConfluencesErik van Rooijen0Erik Mosselman1Kees Sloff2Wim Uijttewaal3Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628CN Delft, The NetherlandsRemarkable 3D flow structures occur at river confluences with small density differences due to differences in sediment concentration or temperature. We explain these by comparing numerical simulations for an idealized confluence with aerial photographs of several river confluences where color differences express the pattern of density differences at the surface. We analyzed numerical simulations of the Rio Negro–Solimões confluence near Manaus, Brazil, in more detail. The numerical model of the idealized confluence showed that the dense water flowed under the light water and the light water over the dense water in a spiraling motion, distorting the interface between the two waters. The horizontal part of this interface moves upwards in downstream direction. Constraining of the spiraling motion in a narrow river downstream of the confluence can cause local up- and downwelling near the banks. A mixing layer can develop when the flow velocities of the two tributaries differ, but strong spiraling motion due to the density differences can suppress this development. The aerial photographs and all numerical simulations showed similar density patterns at the water surface. Even small density differences can have a significant impact and hence need to be considered when analyzing and modeling 3D flow at confluences.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3084confluencedensity differencestemperature differencessediment concentrationflow patternscoherent structures |
spellingShingle | Erik van Rooijen Erik Mosselman Kees Sloff Wim Uijttewaal The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences Water confluence density differences temperature differences sediment concentration flow patterns coherent structures |
title | The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences |
title_full | The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences |
title_short | The Effect of Small Density Differences at River Confluences |
title_sort | effect of small density differences at river confluences |
topic | confluence density differences temperature differences sediment concentration flow patterns coherent structures |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erikvanrooijen theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT erikmosselman theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT keessloff theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT wimuijttewaal theeffectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT erikvanrooijen effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT erikmosselman effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT keessloff effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences AT wimuijttewaal effectofsmalldensitydifferencesatriverconfluences |