Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose

Perfume identification (PI) based on an electronic nose (EN) can be used for exposing counterfeit perfumes more time-efficiently and cost-effectively than using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry instruments. During the past five years, decision-tree-based ensemble learning methods, also calle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mengli Cao, Xingwei Ling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/19/9716
_version_ 1797480652598149120
author Mengli Cao
Xingwei Ling
author_facet Mengli Cao
Xingwei Ling
author_sort Mengli Cao
collection DOAJ
description Perfume identification (PI) based on an electronic nose (EN) can be used for exposing counterfeit perfumes more time-efficiently and cost-effectively than using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry instruments. During the past five years, decision-tree-based ensemble learning methods, also called tree ensemble learning methods, have demonstrated excellent performance when solving multi-class classification problems. However, the performance of tree ensemble learning methods for the EN-based PI problem remains uncertain. In this paper, four well-known tree ensemble learning classification methods, random forest (RF), stagewise additive modeling using a multi-class exponential loss function (SAMME), gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were implemented for PI using our self-designed EN. For fair comparison, all the tested classification methods used as input the same feature data extracted using principal component analysis. Moreover, two benchmark methods, neural network and support vector machine, were also tested with the same experimental setup. The quantitative results of experiments undertaken demonstrated that the mean PI accuracy achieved by XGBoost was up to 97.5%, and that XGBoost outperformed other tested methods in terms of accuracy mean and variance based on our self-designed EN.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:04:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-02234db121864690a06dbf9a537d3c4e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:04:07Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-02234db121864690a06dbf9a537d3c4e2023-11-23T19:44:22ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172022-09-011219971610.3390/app12199716Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic NoseMengli Cao0Xingwei Ling1Logistic Engineering College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, ChinaLogistic Engineering College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, ChinaPerfume identification (PI) based on an electronic nose (EN) can be used for exposing counterfeit perfumes more time-efficiently and cost-effectively than using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry instruments. During the past five years, decision-tree-based ensemble learning methods, also called tree ensemble learning methods, have demonstrated excellent performance when solving multi-class classification problems. However, the performance of tree ensemble learning methods for the EN-based PI problem remains uncertain. In this paper, four well-known tree ensemble learning classification methods, random forest (RF), stagewise additive modeling using a multi-class exponential loss function (SAMME), gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were implemented for PI using our self-designed EN. For fair comparison, all the tested classification methods used as input the same feature data extracted using principal component analysis. Moreover, two benchmark methods, neural network and support vector machine, were also tested with the same experimental setup. The quantitative results of experiments undertaken demonstrated that the mean PI accuracy achieved by XGBoost was up to 97.5%, and that XGBoost outperformed other tested methods in terms of accuracy mean and variance based on our self-designed EN.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/19/9716electronic noseperfume identificationensemble learningXGBoost
spellingShingle Mengli Cao
Xingwei Ling
Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
Applied Sciences
electronic nose
perfume identification
ensemble learning
XGBoost
title Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
title_full Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
title_short Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
title_sort quantitative comparison of tree ensemble learning methods for perfume identification using a portable electronic nose
topic electronic nose
perfume identification
ensemble learning
XGBoost
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/19/9716
work_keys_str_mv AT menglicao quantitativecomparisonoftreeensemblelearningmethodsforperfumeidentificationusingaportableelectronicnose
AT xingweiling quantitativecomparisonoftreeensemblelearningmethodsforperfumeidentificationusingaportableelectronicnose