Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
The attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular ri...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2018-12-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/40868 |
_version_ | 1811202745072353280 |
---|---|
author | Matthew J Davidson David Alais Jeroen JA van Boxtel Naotsugu Tsuchiya |
author_facet | Matthew J Davidson David Alais Jeroen JA van Boxtel Naotsugu Tsuchiya |
author_sort | Matthew J Davidson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular rivalry. When crossmodally cued toward a conscious image, subsequent changes in consciousness occurred at ~8 Hz, consistent with the rates of undivided attentional sampling. However, when attention was cued toward the suppressed image, changes in consciousness slowed to ~3.5 Hz, indicating the division of attention away from the conscious visual image. In the electroencephalogram, we found that at attentional sampling frequencies, the strength of inter-trial phase-coherence over fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital regions correlated with changes in perception. When cues were not task-relevant, these effects disappeared, confirming that perceptual changes were dependent upon the allocation of attention, and that attention can flexibly sample away from a conscious image in a task-dependent manner. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T02:44:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0227cfe066e64ad79ad23c9e89b60786 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2050-084X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T02:44:55Z |
publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications Ltd |
record_format | Article |
series | eLife |
spelling | doaj.art-0227cfe066e64ad79ad23c9e89b607862022-12-22T03:51:13ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2018-12-01710.7554/eLife.40868Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalryMatthew J Davidson0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-040XDavid Alais1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-940XJeroen JA van Boxtel2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-0474Naotsugu Tsuchiya3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8701School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, AustraliaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, AustraliaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaThe attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular rivalry. When crossmodally cued toward a conscious image, subsequent changes in consciousness occurred at ~8 Hz, consistent with the rates of undivided attentional sampling. However, when attention was cued toward the suppressed image, changes in consciousness slowed to ~3.5 Hz, indicating the division of attention away from the conscious visual image. In the electroencephalogram, we found that at attentional sampling frequencies, the strength of inter-trial phase-coherence over fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital regions correlated with changes in perception. When cues were not task-relevant, these effects disappeared, confirming that perceptual changes were dependent upon the allocation of attention, and that attention can flexibly sample away from a conscious image in a task-dependent manner.https://elifesciences.org/articles/40868visual attentionperiodic samplingbinocular rivalrycrossmodal stimulationEEG |
spellingShingle | Matthew J Davidson David Alais Jeroen JA van Boxtel Naotsugu Tsuchiya Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry eLife visual attention periodic sampling binocular rivalry crossmodal stimulation EEG |
title | Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry |
title_full | Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry |
title_fullStr | Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry |
title_full_unstemmed | Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry |
title_short | Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry |
title_sort | attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry |
topic | visual attention periodic sampling binocular rivalry crossmodal stimulation EEG |
url | https://elifesciences.org/articles/40868 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewjdavidson attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry AT davidalais attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry AT jeroenjavanboxtel attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry AT naotsugutsuchiya attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry |