Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry

The attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular ri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew J Davidson, David Alais, Jeroen JA van Boxtel, Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2018-12-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/40868
_version_ 1811202745072353280
author Matthew J Davidson
David Alais
Jeroen JA van Boxtel
Naotsugu Tsuchiya
author_facet Matthew J Davidson
David Alais
Jeroen JA van Boxtel
Naotsugu Tsuchiya
author_sort Matthew J Davidson
collection DOAJ
description The attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular rivalry. When crossmodally cued toward a conscious image, subsequent changes in consciousness occurred at ~8 Hz, consistent with the rates of undivided attentional sampling. However, when attention was cued toward the suppressed image, changes in consciousness slowed to ~3.5 Hz, indicating the division of attention away from the conscious visual image. In the electroencephalogram, we found that at attentional sampling frequencies, the strength of inter-trial phase-coherence over fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital regions correlated with changes in perception. When cues were not task-relevant, these effects disappeared, confirming that perceptual changes were dependent upon the allocation of attention, and that attention can flexibly sample away from a conscious image in a task-dependent manner.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:44:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0227cfe066e64ad79ad23c9e89b60786
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:44:55Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-0227cfe066e64ad79ad23c9e89b607862022-12-22T03:51:13ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2018-12-01710.7554/eLife.40868Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalryMatthew J Davidson0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-040XDavid Alais1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-940XJeroen JA van Boxtel2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-0474Naotsugu Tsuchiya3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8701School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, AustraliaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, AustraliaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaThe attentional sampling hypothesis suggests that attention rhythmically enhances sensory processing when attending to a single (~8 Hz), or multiple (~4 Hz) objects. Here, we investigated whether attention samples sensory representations that are not part of the conscious percept during binocular rivalry. When crossmodally cued toward a conscious image, subsequent changes in consciousness occurred at ~8 Hz, consistent with the rates of undivided attentional sampling. However, when attention was cued toward the suppressed image, changes in consciousness slowed to ~3.5 Hz, indicating the division of attention away from the conscious visual image. In the electroencephalogram, we found that at attentional sampling frequencies, the strength of inter-trial phase-coherence over fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital regions correlated with changes in perception. When cues were not task-relevant, these effects disappeared, confirming that perceptual changes were dependent upon the allocation of attention, and that attention can flexibly sample away from a conscious image in a task-dependent manner.https://elifesciences.org/articles/40868visual attentionperiodic samplingbinocular rivalrycrossmodal stimulationEEG
spellingShingle Matthew J Davidson
David Alais
Jeroen JA van Boxtel
Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
eLife
visual attention
periodic sampling
binocular rivalry
crossmodal stimulation
EEG
title Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
title_full Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
title_fullStr Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
title_full_unstemmed Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
title_short Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
title_sort attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
topic visual attention
periodic sampling
binocular rivalry
crossmodal stimulation
EEG
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/40868
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewjdavidson attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry
AT davidalais attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry
AT jeroenjavanboxtel attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry
AT naotsugutsuchiya attentionperiodicallysamplescompetingstimuliduringbinocularrivalry