Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity

PurposeTo compare the effect of two internal fixation methods of calcaneal plate fixation and Philos plate fixation in treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity.Patients and methodsA total of 37 patients with split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity were retrospectively analyzed fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fei Wang, Xiaohui Niu, Haibo Xia, Wei Liang, Zhen Hu, Jun Lan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1272887/full
_version_ 1797358029476200448
author Fei Wang
Xiaohui Niu
Haibo Xia
Wei Liang
Zhen Hu
Jun Lan
author_facet Fei Wang
Xiaohui Niu
Haibo Xia
Wei Liang
Zhen Hu
Jun Lan
author_sort Fei Wang
collection DOAJ
description PurposeTo compare the effect of two internal fixation methods of calcaneal plate fixation and Philos plate fixation in treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity.Patients and methodsA total of 37 patients with split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity were retrospectively analyzed from September 2016 to April 2021. Enrolled patients were divided into Group A (calcaneal anatomical locking plates), and Group B [Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS)]. The demographics, injury-related variables, surgery-related variables, Constant-Murley score, and postoperative complication between the two groups were compared.ResultsThere were 16 in Group A and 21 in Group B. Fracture union was achieved in all patients, with an average of 11.9 months. The mean length of incision was significantly different between groups (Group A, 6.16 cm ± 1.07 cm; Group B, 9.09 cm ± 1.30 cm, p < 0.05). Significant difference was observed by comparing bleeding loss between Group A and Group B (Group A, 45.41 ± 11.19 ml; Group B, 106.06 ± 11.12 ml, p < 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the average Constant-Murley score of Group A was significantly higher than that of Group B (p < 0.05). In terms of operation, no significant difference was observed between groups. In addition, two patients had shoulder impingement syndrome in Group B, and none in Group A.ConclusionCalcaneal anatomical locking plate fixation is superior to Philos plate fixation in surgical trauma and bleeding loss. Our study provides an alternative technique for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:53:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0232e52c75844daba15db453de089590
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:53:57Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-0232e52c75844daba15db453de0895902024-01-10T17:18:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2024-01-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.12728871272887Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosityFei WangXiaohui NiuHaibo XiaWei LiangZhen HuJun LanPurposeTo compare the effect of two internal fixation methods of calcaneal plate fixation and Philos plate fixation in treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity.Patients and methodsA total of 37 patients with split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity were retrospectively analyzed from September 2016 to April 2021. Enrolled patients were divided into Group A (calcaneal anatomical locking plates), and Group B [Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS)]. The demographics, injury-related variables, surgery-related variables, Constant-Murley score, and postoperative complication between the two groups were compared.ResultsThere were 16 in Group A and 21 in Group B. Fracture union was achieved in all patients, with an average of 11.9 months. The mean length of incision was significantly different between groups (Group A, 6.16 cm ± 1.07 cm; Group B, 9.09 cm ± 1.30 cm, p < 0.05). Significant difference was observed by comparing bleeding loss between Group A and Group B (Group A, 45.41 ± 11.19 ml; Group B, 106.06 ± 11.12 ml, p < 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the average Constant-Murley score of Group A was significantly higher than that of Group B (p < 0.05). In terms of operation, no significant difference was observed between groups. In addition, two patients had shoulder impingement syndrome in Group B, and none in Group A.ConclusionCalcaneal anatomical locking plate fixation is superior to Philos plate fixation in surgical trauma and bleeding loss. Our study provides an alternative technique for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1272887/fullsplit fractureshumeral greater tuberositycalcaneal anatomical locking plateproximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS)surgery
spellingShingle Fei Wang
Xiaohui Niu
Haibo Xia
Wei Liang
Zhen Hu
Jun Lan
Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
Frontiers in Surgery
split fractures
humeral greater tuberosity
calcaneal anatomical locking plate
proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS)
surgery
title Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
title_full Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
title_fullStr Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
title_full_unstemmed Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
title_short Novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
title_sort novel calcaneal plate versus traditional philos plate for treating split fractures of humeral greater tuberosity
topic split fractures
humeral greater tuberosity
calcaneal anatomical locking plate
proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS)
surgery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1272887/full
work_keys_str_mv AT feiwang novelcalcanealplateversustraditionalphilosplatefortreatingsplitfracturesofhumeralgreatertuberosity
AT xiaohuiniu novelcalcanealplateversustraditionalphilosplatefortreatingsplitfracturesofhumeralgreatertuberosity
AT haiboxia novelcalcanealplateversustraditionalphilosplatefortreatingsplitfracturesofhumeralgreatertuberosity
AT weiliang novelcalcanealplateversustraditionalphilosplatefortreatingsplitfracturesofhumeralgreatertuberosity
AT zhenhu novelcalcanealplateversustraditionalphilosplatefortreatingsplitfracturesofhumeralgreatertuberosity
AT junlan novelcalcanealplateversustraditionalphilosplatefortreatingsplitfracturesofhumeralgreatertuberosity