Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea

This study investigates the impacts of nuclear energy consumption on environmental quality from a different perspective by focusing on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, ecological footprint, and load capacity factor. In this context, the South Korea case, which is a leading country producing and consu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ugur Korkut Pata, Mustafa Tevfik Kartal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-02-01
Series:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573322005083
_version_ 1797897271849779200
author Ugur Korkut Pata
Mustafa Tevfik Kartal
author_facet Ugur Korkut Pata
Mustafa Tevfik Kartal
author_sort Ugur Korkut Pata
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the impacts of nuclear energy consumption on environmental quality from a different perspective by focusing on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, ecological footprint, and load capacity factor. In this context, the South Korea case, which is a leading country producing and consuming nuclear energy, is investigated by considering also economic growth, and the 1997 Asian crisis from 1977 to 2018. To this end, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Different from previous literature, this study proposes a load capacity curve (LCC) and tests the LCC and environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypotheses simultaneously. The analysis results reveal that (i) the LCC and EKC hypotheses are valid in South Korea; (ii) nuclear energy has an improving effect on the environmental quality; (iii) renewable energy does not have a significant long-term impact on the environment; (iv) the 1997 Asian crisis had an increasing effect on the load capacity factor; (v) South Korea has not yet reached the turning point, identified as $55,411, where per capita income improves environmental quality. Overall, the results show the validity of the LCC and EKC hypotheses and prove the positive contribution of nuclear energy to South Korea's green development strategies.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:55:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-023fcd636c5a426a9e82118f53a57d38
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1738-5733
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:55:57Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Nuclear Engineering and Technology
spelling doaj.art-023fcd636c5a426a9e82118f53a57d382023-02-23T04:30:46ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332023-02-01552587594Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South KoreaUgur Korkut Pata0Mustafa Tevfik Kartal1Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80000, Merkez, Osmaniye, Turkey; Corresponding author.,Borsa İstanbul Strategic Planning, Financial Reporting, and Investor Relations Directorate, İstanbul, TurkeyThis study investigates the impacts of nuclear energy consumption on environmental quality from a different perspective by focusing on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, ecological footprint, and load capacity factor. In this context, the South Korea case, which is a leading country producing and consuming nuclear energy, is investigated by considering also economic growth, and the 1997 Asian crisis from 1977 to 2018. To this end, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Different from previous literature, this study proposes a load capacity curve (LCC) and tests the LCC and environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypotheses simultaneously. The analysis results reveal that (i) the LCC and EKC hypotheses are valid in South Korea; (ii) nuclear energy has an improving effect on the environmental quality; (iii) renewable energy does not have a significant long-term impact on the environment; (iv) the 1997 Asian crisis had an increasing effect on the load capacity factor; (v) South Korea has not yet reached the turning point, identified as $55,411, where per capita income improves environmental quality. Overall, the results show the validity of the LCC and EKC hypotheses and prove the positive contribution of nuclear energy to South Korea's green development strategies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573322005083LCCEKCNuclear energyRenewable energySouth Korea
spellingShingle Ugur Korkut Pata
Mustafa Tevfik Kartal
Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
LCC
EKC
Nuclear energy
Renewable energy
South Korea
title Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea
title_full Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea
title_fullStr Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea
title_full_unstemmed Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea
title_short Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea
title_sort impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality testing the ekc and lcc hypotheses for south korea
topic LCC
EKC
Nuclear energy
Renewable energy
South Korea
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573322005083
work_keys_str_mv AT ugurkorkutpata impactofnuclearandrenewableenergysourcesonenvironmentqualitytestingtheekcandlcchypothesesforsouthkorea
AT mustafatevfikkartal impactofnuclearandrenewableenergysourcesonenvironmentqualitytestingtheekcandlcchypothesesforsouthkorea