Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives
This article envisages a possible tripartite division of (types of) being, in correspondence, one the one hand, to Eugenio Coseriu’s linguistic contents (significatum, designatum, sense) and on the other hand to Charles Sanders Peirce’s ‘participants’ in the process of semiosis (sign, object and int...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | American, British and Canadian Studies Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsj-2023-0019 |
| _version_ | 1797340916207321088 |
|---|---|
| author | Vîlcu Dumitru-Cornel |
| author_facet | Vîlcu Dumitru-Cornel |
| author_sort | Vîlcu Dumitru-Cornel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article envisages a possible tripartite division of (types of) being, in correspondence, one the one hand, to Eugenio Coseriu’s linguistic contents (significatum, designatum, sense) and on the other hand to Charles Sanders Peirce’s ‘participants’ in the process of semiosis (sign, object and interpretant). Being as eidos/ essence, corresponding to idiomatic significata, is responsible for the constitution of stabilities and/ or iterations within the otherwise perpetual flux of cogitata/ phenomena. Being as actual existence or particular, intentional object corresponds to the linguistic designata as they are produced through and by speech in the very linguistic act(s). Finally, being as ecstasis (in the Heideggerian sense of this term) or as sense represents the individual speaker’s ‘stance’ in the world, at the same time ‘opening’ it to interpretation by the others. Also, if on the levels of significata and designata language is simply/ purely logos semantikos, on the level of sense the three possible intents of the speaker (apophantikos, poetikos, pragmatikos) can be put into correspondence to the old/ traditional naming and understanding of temporal ec-stases as past, present and future respectively. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:10:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0240bf1332174706a594813448cbae6e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1841-964X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:10:21Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | American, British and Canadian Studies Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-0240bf1332174706a594813448cbae6e2024-01-29T08:49:34ZengSciendoAmerican, British and Canadian Studies Journal1841-964X2023-12-01411467210.2478/abcsj-2023-0019Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) PerspectivesVîlcu Dumitru-Cornel01Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaThis article envisages a possible tripartite division of (types of) being, in correspondence, one the one hand, to Eugenio Coseriu’s linguistic contents (significatum, designatum, sense) and on the other hand to Charles Sanders Peirce’s ‘participants’ in the process of semiosis (sign, object and interpretant). Being as eidos/ essence, corresponding to idiomatic significata, is responsible for the constitution of stabilities and/ or iterations within the otherwise perpetual flux of cogitata/ phenomena. Being as actual existence or particular, intentional object corresponds to the linguistic designata as they are produced through and by speech in the very linguistic act(s). Finally, being as ecstasis (in the Heideggerian sense of this term) or as sense represents the individual speaker’s ‘stance’ in the world, at the same time ‘opening’ it to interpretation by the others. Also, if on the levels of significata and designata language is simply/ purely logos semantikos, on the level of sense the three possible intents of the speaker (apophantikos, poetikos, pragmatikos) can be put into correspondence to the old/ traditional naming and understanding of temporal ec-stases as past, present and future respectively.https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsj-2023-0019linguistic relativitysignificatum (signifiébezeichnung)designatum (bedeutung)sense (sinn)eidetic intuitionintuitive filling (erfüllung)(phenomenological) intentional object(heideggerian) ecstasiscenopythagorean (peircean) categoriesthirdnesslogos semantikos |
| spellingShingle | Vîlcu Dumitru-Cornel Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives American, British and Canadian Studies Journal linguistic relativity significatum (signifiébezeichnung) designatum (bedeutung) sense (sinn) eidetic intuition intuitive filling (erfüllung) (phenomenological) intentional object (heideggerian) ecstasis cenopythagorean (peircean) categories thirdness logos semantikos |
| title | Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives |
| title_full | Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives |
| title_fullStr | Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives |
| title_full_unstemmed | Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives |
| title_short | Triangle(s) of Being: Linguistic (Coserian) and Semiotic (Peircean) Perspectives |
| title_sort | triangle s of being linguistic coserian and semiotic peircean perspectives |
| topic | linguistic relativity significatum (signifiébezeichnung) designatum (bedeutung) sense (sinn) eidetic intuition intuitive filling (erfüllung) (phenomenological) intentional object (heideggerian) ecstasis cenopythagorean (peircean) categories thirdness logos semantikos |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsj-2023-0019 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vilcudumitrucornel trianglesofbeinglinguisticcoserianandsemioticpeirceanperspectives |