Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis

Osteolytic lesions can be seen in both multiple myeloma (MM), and osteolytic bone metastasis on computed tomography (CT) scans. We sought to assess the feasibility of a CT-based radiomics model to distinguish MM from metastasis. This study retrospectively included patients with pre-treatment thoraci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seungeun Lee, So-Yeon Lee, Sanghee Kim, Yeon-Jung Huh, Jooyeon Lee, Ko-Eun Lee, Joon-Yong Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/4/755
_version_ 1797621479035109376
author Seungeun Lee
So-Yeon Lee
Sanghee Kim
Yeon-Jung Huh
Jooyeon Lee
Ko-Eun Lee
Joon-Yong Jung
author_facet Seungeun Lee
So-Yeon Lee
Sanghee Kim
Yeon-Jung Huh
Jooyeon Lee
Ko-Eun Lee
Joon-Yong Jung
author_sort Seungeun Lee
collection DOAJ
description Osteolytic lesions can be seen in both multiple myeloma (MM), and osteolytic bone metastasis on computed tomography (CT) scans. We sought to assess the feasibility of a CT-based radiomics model to distinguish MM from metastasis. This study retrospectively included patients with pre-treatment thoracic or abdominal contrast-enhanced CT from institution 1 (training set: 175 patients with 425 lesions) and institution 2 (external test set: 50 patients with 85 lesions). After segmenting osteolytic lesions on CT images, 1218 radiomics features were extracted. A random forest (RF) classifier was used to build the radiomics model with 10-fold cross-validation. Three radiologists distinguished MM from metastasis using a five-point scale, both with and without the assistance of RF model results. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of the RF model was 0.807 and 0.762 for the training and test set, respectively. The AUC of the RF model and the radiologists (0.653–0.778) was not significantly different for the test set (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.179). The AUC of all radiologists was significantly increased (0.833–0.900) when they were assisted by RF model results (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In conclusion, the CT-based radiomics model can differentiate MM from osteolytic bone metastasis and improve radiologists’ diagnostic performance.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:56:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-02519102de824edbb90c5728241611ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:56:31Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-02519102de824edbb90c5728241611ba2023-11-16T20:02:31ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182023-02-0113475510.3390/diagnostics13040755Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics AnalysisSeungeun Lee0So-Yeon Lee1Sanghee Kim2Yeon-Jung Huh3Jooyeon Lee4Ko-Eun Lee5Joon-Yong Jung6Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaOsteolytic lesions can be seen in both multiple myeloma (MM), and osteolytic bone metastasis on computed tomography (CT) scans. We sought to assess the feasibility of a CT-based radiomics model to distinguish MM from metastasis. This study retrospectively included patients with pre-treatment thoracic or abdominal contrast-enhanced CT from institution 1 (training set: 175 patients with 425 lesions) and institution 2 (external test set: 50 patients with 85 lesions). After segmenting osteolytic lesions on CT images, 1218 radiomics features were extracted. A random forest (RF) classifier was used to build the radiomics model with 10-fold cross-validation. Three radiologists distinguished MM from metastasis using a five-point scale, both with and without the assistance of RF model results. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of the RF model was 0.807 and 0.762 for the training and test set, respectively. The AUC of the RF model and the radiologists (0.653–0.778) was not significantly different for the test set (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.179). The AUC of all radiologists was significantly increased (0.833–0.900) when they were assisted by RF model results (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In conclusion, the CT-based radiomics model can differentiate MM from osteolytic bone metastasis and improve radiologists’ diagnostic performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/4/755multiple myelomaneoplasm metastasismultidetector computed tomographydiagnosisalgorithmradiomics
spellingShingle Seungeun Lee
So-Yeon Lee
Sanghee Kim
Yeon-Jung Huh
Jooyeon Lee
Ko-Eun Lee
Joon-Yong Jung
Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis
Diagnostics
multiple myeloma
neoplasm metastasis
multidetector computed tomography
diagnosis
algorithm
radiomics
title Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis
title_full Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis
title_fullStr Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis
title_short Differentiating Multiple Myeloma and Osteolytic Bone Metastases on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans: The Feasibility of Radiomics Analysis
title_sort differentiating multiple myeloma and osteolytic bone metastases on contrast enhanced computed tomography scans the feasibility of radiomics analysis
topic multiple myeloma
neoplasm metastasis
multidetector computed tomography
diagnosis
algorithm
radiomics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/4/755
work_keys_str_mv AT seungeunlee differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis
AT soyeonlee differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis
AT sangheekim differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis
AT yeonjunghuh differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis
AT jooyeonlee differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis
AT koeunlee differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis
AT joonyongjung differentiatingmultiplemyelomaandosteolyticbonemetastasesoncontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyscansthefeasibilityofradiomicsanalysis