Apropos Technophany
This article aims to reconstruct Simondon’s concept of technophany, which disperses throughout different writings that appeared posthumously and suggest how elaborating this concept could be understood as a significant philosophical task today. Technophany, namely the manifestation of technicity, i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Radboud University Press
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Technophany |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://technophany.philosophyandtechnology.network/article/view/18533 |
| _version_ | 1797222758560563200 |
|---|---|
| author | Yuk Hui |
| author_facet | Yuk Hui |
| author_sort | Yuk Hui |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article aims to reconstruct Simondon’s concept of technophany, which disperses throughout different writings that appeared posthumously and suggest how elaborating this concept could be understood as a significant philosophical task today. Technophany, namely the manifestation of technicity, is central to Simondon’s thought on techno-aesthetics and, more importantly, his intellectual project of reintegrating technology into culture. However, when we place Simondon’s concept of technophany in today’s context, namely the convergence of technology, art and design since the second half of the 20th century, we see that technophanies are becoming more or less ordinary marketing phenomena of the tech industry. Then, could the concept of technophany still take up this task of reconciling technology and culture? Or, instead, is it reduced to a mere economic category, and Simondon’s techno-aesthetics is only a forerunner of today’s industrial marketing strategies? In order to respond to these questions, this article returns to the source of Simondon’s concept of technicity. It shows that there is an intimacy between technophany and Mircea Eliade’s concept of hierophany, and indeed, Simondon’s genesis of technicity vividly mirrors Eliade’s analysis of sacrality and its crisis in modern times. The concept of technophany acquires a new meaning, and it refuses to be a mere phenomenon of publicity as one might easily misread it. Technophany has the task of occupying the “no man’s land” between technicity and sacrality. However, what exactly does it mean? Through the reconstruction of the concept of technophany in Simondon’s thought, this article hopes to examine the limit of the concept and, at the same time, reconceptualise and prolong it.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:26:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0251c8558eac460d8a696e1d913a638a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2773-0875 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:26:25Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Radboud University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Technophany |
| spelling | doaj.art-0251c8558eac460d8a696e1d913a638a2024-04-04T09:36:39ZengRadboud University PressTechnophany2773-08752024-01-011210.54195/technophany.18533Apropos TechnophanyYuk Hui This article aims to reconstruct Simondon’s concept of technophany, which disperses throughout different writings that appeared posthumously and suggest how elaborating this concept could be understood as a significant philosophical task today. Technophany, namely the manifestation of technicity, is central to Simondon’s thought on techno-aesthetics and, more importantly, his intellectual project of reintegrating technology into culture. However, when we place Simondon’s concept of technophany in today’s context, namely the convergence of technology, art and design since the second half of the 20th century, we see that technophanies are becoming more or less ordinary marketing phenomena of the tech industry. Then, could the concept of technophany still take up this task of reconciling technology and culture? Or, instead, is it reduced to a mere economic category, and Simondon’s techno-aesthetics is only a forerunner of today’s industrial marketing strategies? In order to respond to these questions, this article returns to the source of Simondon’s concept of technicity. It shows that there is an intimacy between technophany and Mircea Eliade’s concept of hierophany, and indeed, Simondon’s genesis of technicity vividly mirrors Eliade’s analysis of sacrality and its crisis in modern times. The concept of technophany acquires a new meaning, and it refuses to be a mere phenomenon of publicity as one might easily misread it. Technophany has the task of occupying the “no man’s land” between technicity and sacrality. However, what exactly does it mean? Through the reconstruction of the concept of technophany in Simondon’s thought, this article hopes to examine the limit of the concept and, at the same time, reconceptualise and prolong it. https://technophany.philosophyandtechnology.network/article/view/18533SimondontechnophanyMircea Eliade |
| spellingShingle | Yuk Hui Apropos Technophany Technophany Simondon technophany Mircea Eliade |
| title | Apropos Technophany |
| title_full | Apropos Technophany |
| title_fullStr | Apropos Technophany |
| title_full_unstemmed | Apropos Technophany |
| title_short | Apropos Technophany |
| title_sort | apropos technophany |
| topic | Simondon technophany Mircea Eliade |
| url | https://technophany.philosophyandtechnology.network/article/view/18533 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yukhui apropostechnophany |