Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response

Background. The latest Movement Disorder Society (MDS) diagnostic criteria require a good and sustained response to medication to get a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, PD. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate levodopa response in a group of patients with probable PD, diagnosed by movem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mette Niemann Johansen, Anna Handberg, Mohamed El Haddouchi, Josefine Grundtvig, Steen Rusborg Jensen, Lisette Salvesen, Annemette Løkkegaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2024-01-01
Series:Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2649578
_version_ 1797292006924353536
author Mette Niemann Johansen
Anna Handberg
Mohamed El Haddouchi
Josefine Grundtvig
Steen Rusborg Jensen
Lisette Salvesen
Annemette Løkkegaard
author_facet Mette Niemann Johansen
Anna Handberg
Mohamed El Haddouchi
Josefine Grundtvig
Steen Rusborg Jensen
Lisette Salvesen
Annemette Løkkegaard
author_sort Mette Niemann Johansen
collection DOAJ
description Background. The latest Movement Disorder Society (MDS) diagnostic criteria require a good and sustained response to medication to get a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, PD. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate levodopa response in a group of patients with probable PD, diagnosed by movement disorder specialists. Methods. An acute levodopa challenge test (LDCT) was performed after pausing the dopaminergic medication for 6 half-times. The motor part of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale was performed in the OFF-state and after LDCT (ON). A good effect was defined as >30% improvement. A video-protocol was used to secure standardized motor examination with blinded assessments of the UPDRS-III OFF and ON. An age-matched group of control subjects (CS) was included but did not go through LDCT. All participants were evaluated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI). Results. In the statistical analysis, 37 patients were included. Twenty-one patients showed an improvement ≤30%, while 16 patients showed an improvement >30%. LDCT showed an overall mean improvement of 27.3% of motor UPDRS. In 43.2%, there was a discrepancy between the effect seen with the LDCT and the patients’ self-perceived medicine evaluation. Patients with PD had a significantly lower MoCA score and more depressive symptoms compared to CS. Conclusions. We showed an acute effect of levodopa using LDCT that was around 30% improvement. While it lends support to the use of this limit in the MDS diagnostic criteria, an acute effect of less than 30% should be considered acceptable in some patients. Our study highlights a discrepancy in the objective measure of medicine effect on motor symptoms and the patient’s subjective evaluation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T19:46:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-026bd5aeca2b4aa4b32e716768c08532
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2042-0080
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T19:46:00Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series Parkinson's Disease
spelling doaj.art-026bd5aeca2b4aa4b32e716768c085322024-02-29T00:00:02ZengHindawi LimitedParkinson's Disease2042-00802024-01-01202410.1155/2024/2649578Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa ResponseMette Niemann Johansen0Anna Handberg1Mohamed El Haddouchi2Josefine Grundtvig3Steen Rusborg Jensen4Lisette Salvesen5Annemette Løkkegaard6Department of NeurologyEmergency DepartmentDepartment of OtorhinolaryngologyDepartment of NeurologyDepartment of NeurologyDepartment of NeurologyDepartment of NeurologyBackground. The latest Movement Disorder Society (MDS) diagnostic criteria require a good and sustained response to medication to get a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, PD. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate levodopa response in a group of patients with probable PD, diagnosed by movement disorder specialists. Methods. An acute levodopa challenge test (LDCT) was performed after pausing the dopaminergic medication for 6 half-times. The motor part of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale was performed in the OFF-state and after LDCT (ON). A good effect was defined as >30% improvement. A video-protocol was used to secure standardized motor examination with blinded assessments of the UPDRS-III OFF and ON. An age-matched group of control subjects (CS) was included but did not go through LDCT. All participants were evaluated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI). Results. In the statistical analysis, 37 patients were included. Twenty-one patients showed an improvement ≤30%, while 16 patients showed an improvement >30%. LDCT showed an overall mean improvement of 27.3% of motor UPDRS. In 43.2%, there was a discrepancy between the effect seen with the LDCT and the patients’ self-perceived medicine evaluation. Patients with PD had a significantly lower MoCA score and more depressive symptoms compared to CS. Conclusions. We showed an acute effect of levodopa using LDCT that was around 30% improvement. While it lends support to the use of this limit in the MDS diagnostic criteria, an acute effect of less than 30% should be considered acceptable in some patients. Our study highlights a discrepancy in the objective measure of medicine effect on motor symptoms and the patient’s subjective evaluation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2649578
spellingShingle Mette Niemann Johansen
Anna Handberg
Mohamed El Haddouchi
Josefine Grundtvig
Steen Rusborg Jensen
Lisette Salvesen
Annemette Løkkegaard
Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response
Parkinson's Disease
title Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response
title_full Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response
title_fullStr Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response
title_full_unstemmed Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response
title_short Improvement by Medication Less than Expected in Parkinson’s Disease: Blinded Evaluation of Levodopa Response
title_sort improvement by medication less than expected in parkinson s disease blinded evaluation of levodopa response
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2649578
work_keys_str_mv AT metteniemannjohansen improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse
AT annahandberg improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse
AT mohamedelhaddouchi improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse
AT josefinegrundtvig improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse
AT steenrusborgjensen improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse
AT lisettesalvesen improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse
AT annemetteløkkegaard improvementbymedicationlessthanexpectedinparkinsonsdiseaseblindedevaluationoflevodoparesponse