Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study

Abstract Background Self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIg) reduces nursing time and eliminates the need for treatment at ambulatory care clinics, as compared with clinic-based intravenously administered IgG (IVIg), and are therapeutically equivalent. Estimating the economic impact of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce Ritchie, Karen J. B. Martins, Dat T. Tran, Heather Blain, Lawrence Richer, Scott W. Klarenbach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00735-6
_version_ 1797986828514492416
author Bruce Ritchie
Karen J. B. Martins
Dat T. Tran
Heather Blain
Lawrence Richer
Scott W. Klarenbach
author_facet Bruce Ritchie
Karen J. B. Martins
Dat T. Tran
Heather Blain
Lawrence Richer
Scott W. Klarenbach
author_sort Bruce Ritchie
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIg) reduces nursing time and eliminates the need for treatment at ambulatory care clinics, as compared with clinic-based intravenously administered IgG (IVIg), and are therapeutically equivalent. Estimating the economic impact of self-administered SCIg versus clinic-administered IVIg therapy may guide treatment recommendations. Methods A retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative data from Alberta was performed; those treated with IgG between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2019 were included. Costs for medical laboratory staff and nursing time, as well as ambulatory care visits were considered. Univariate generalized linear model regression with gamma distribution and log link was used to compare cost ($CDN 2020) between SCIg and IVIg administration. Stratified analysis by age (≥ 18-years; < 18-years) was performed. Results Among 7,890 (6,148 adults; 1,742 children) individuals who received IgG, the average administration cost per patient-year of self-administered SCIg was $5,386 (95% confidence interval [CI] $5,039, $5,734) lower than clinic-administered IVIg; per patient-year cost of self-administered SCIg was $817 (95% CI $723, $912) versus $6,204 (95% CI $6,100, $6,308) for clinic-administered IVIg. The per patient-year cost of self-administered SCIg was $5,931 (95% CI $5,543, $6,319) lower among adults and $3,177 (95% CI $2,473, $3,882) lower among children compared with clinic-administered IVIg. An estimated $31.0 million (95% CI $29.0, $33.0) in cost savings to the health system would be realised if 80% of individuals switched from clinic-administered IVIg to self-administered SCIg. Conclusions Self-administered SCIg is substantially less costly from a health care payer perspective in Canada. Within this type of health system, switching to self-administered SCIg has the potential to reduce overall health care costs, lessen nursing burden, and may increase clinic-based capacity for others.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:39:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-026cfbd742574a889f36ce6ed8bbab14
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1710-1492
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:39:10Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
spelling doaj.art-026cfbd742574a889f36ce6ed8bbab142022-12-22T04:36:38ZengBMCAllergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology1710-14922022-11-0118111110.1186/s13223-022-00735-6Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort studyBruce Ritchie0Karen J. B. Martins1Dat T. Tran2Heather Blain3Lawrence Richer4Scott W. Klarenbach5Department of Medicine, University of AlbertaReal World Evidence Unit, University of AlbertaInstitute of Health EconomicsAlberta Precision LaboratoriesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of AlbertaDepartment of Medicine, University of AlbertaAbstract Background Self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIg) reduces nursing time and eliminates the need for treatment at ambulatory care clinics, as compared with clinic-based intravenously administered IgG (IVIg), and are therapeutically equivalent. Estimating the economic impact of self-administered SCIg versus clinic-administered IVIg therapy may guide treatment recommendations. Methods A retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative data from Alberta was performed; those treated with IgG between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2019 were included. Costs for medical laboratory staff and nursing time, as well as ambulatory care visits were considered. Univariate generalized linear model regression with gamma distribution and log link was used to compare cost ($CDN 2020) between SCIg and IVIg administration. Stratified analysis by age (≥ 18-years; < 18-years) was performed. Results Among 7,890 (6,148 adults; 1,742 children) individuals who received IgG, the average administration cost per patient-year of self-administered SCIg was $5,386 (95% confidence interval [CI] $5,039, $5,734) lower than clinic-administered IVIg; per patient-year cost of self-administered SCIg was $817 (95% CI $723, $912) versus $6,204 (95% CI $6,100, $6,308) for clinic-administered IVIg. The per patient-year cost of self-administered SCIg was $5,931 (95% CI $5,543, $6,319) lower among adults and $3,177 (95% CI $2,473, $3,882) lower among children compared with clinic-administered IVIg. An estimated $31.0 million (95% CI $29.0, $33.0) in cost savings to the health system would be realised if 80% of individuals switched from clinic-administered IVIg to self-administered SCIg. Conclusions Self-administered SCIg is substantially less costly from a health care payer perspective in Canada. Within this type of health system, switching to self-administered SCIg has the potential to reduce overall health care costs, lessen nursing burden, and may increase clinic-based capacity for others.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00735-6Immunoglobulin GSubcutaneousIntravenousHome-based administrationClinic-based administrationAdministrative data
spellingShingle Bruce Ritchie
Karen J. B. Martins
Dat T. Tran
Heather Blain
Lawrence Richer
Scott W. Klarenbach
Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Immunoglobulin G
Subcutaneous
Intravenous
Home-based administration
Clinic-based administration
Administrative data
title Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study
title_full Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study
title_short Economic impact of self-administered subcutaneous versus clinic-administered intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study
title_sort economic impact of self administered subcutaneous versus clinic administered intravenous immunoglobulin g therapy in alberta canada a population based cohort study
topic Immunoglobulin G
Subcutaneous
Intravenous
Home-based administration
Clinic-based administration
Administrative data
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-022-00735-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bruceritchie economicimpactofselfadministeredsubcutaneousversusclinicadministeredintravenousimmunoglobulingtherapyinalbertacanadaapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT karenjbmartins economicimpactofselfadministeredsubcutaneousversusclinicadministeredintravenousimmunoglobulingtherapyinalbertacanadaapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT datttran economicimpactofselfadministeredsubcutaneousversusclinicadministeredintravenousimmunoglobulingtherapyinalbertacanadaapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT heatherblain economicimpactofselfadministeredsubcutaneousversusclinicadministeredintravenousimmunoglobulingtherapyinalbertacanadaapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT lawrencericher economicimpactofselfadministeredsubcutaneousversusclinicadministeredintravenousimmunoglobulingtherapyinalbertacanadaapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT scottwklarenbach economicimpactofselfadministeredsubcutaneousversusclinicadministeredintravenousimmunoglobulingtherapyinalbertacanadaapopulationbasedcohortstudy