El Comentario de Miguel de Éfeso a PA A1 en el Origen Griego de la Rama Biológica de la Tradición Aristotélica
In De partibus animalium A1, Aristotle presents —in a darker than usual way— decisive details of the methodology he devised for his science of nature. His indications seem to point the path along which Aristotelian biology should travel. However, numerous textual and systematic difficulties have gi...
Main Author: | Eduardo H. Mombello |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/203163 |
Similar Items
-
Aristotelismo y estoicismo en el comentario de Miguel de Éfeso al De motu animalium de Aristóteles
by: Marcelo D. Boeri
Published: (2022-07-01) -
De motu animalium. Fragmenta translationis anonymae and De progressu animalium, De motu animalium. Translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka by Pieter De Leemans
by: Pietro B. Rossi
Published: (2014-01-01) -
UNA IGLESIA CRISTIANA SOBRE EL SOLAR DEL TEMPLO PAGANO DE ARTEMIS EN ÉFESO PREÁMBULOS Y PROBLEMÁTICA
by: Ernst Kanitz
Published: (1997-01-01) -
Jenofonte de Éfeso: ornato retórico en las Efesíacas
by: Juan José Pomer Monferrer
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Sentencia falsamente atribuida al Concilio de Éfeso
by: Joaquín Salaverri
Published: (1945-07-01)