Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles

PurposeThis study aims to create and validate a clinical model that predict the probability of fertilization failure in routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.MethodsThis study employed a retrospective methodology, gathering data from 1770 couples that used reproductive center’s of the Fourth H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu Xingnan, Zhang Na
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1331640/full
_version_ 1797351534004011008
author Liu Xingnan
Zhang Na
author_facet Liu Xingnan
Zhang Na
author_sort Liu Xingnan
collection DOAJ
description PurposeThis study aims to create and validate a clinical model that predict the probability of fertilization failure in routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.MethodsThis study employed a retrospective methodology, gathering data from 1770 couples that used reproductive center’s of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University standard IVF fertilization between June 2015 and June 2023. 1062 were in the training set and 708 were in the validation set when it was randomly split into the training set and validation set in a 6:4 ratio. The study employed both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the factors those influence the failure of traditional in vitro fertilization. Based on the multiple regression model, a predictive model of traditional IVF fertilization failure was created. The calibration and decision curves were used to assess the effectiveness and therapeutic usefulness of this model.ResultsThe following factors independently predicted the probability of an unsuccessful fertilization: infertility years, basal oestrogen, the rate of mature oocytes, oligoasthenozoospermia, sperm concentration, sperm vitality, percentage of abnormal morphological sperm, and percentage of progressive motility (PR%).The receiver operating characteristic curve’s area under the curve (AUC) in the training set is 0.776 (95% CI: 0.740,0.812), while the validation set’s AUC is 0.756 (95% CI: 0.708,0.805), indicating a rather high clinical prediction capacity.ConclusionOur generated nomogram has the ability to forecast the probability of fertilization failure in couples undergoing IVF, hence can assist clinical staff in making informed decisions.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:01:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-02b2f010aea94516a14934c81d97b9bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:01:52Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-02b2f010aea94516a14934c81d97b9bf2024-01-19T04:43:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922024-01-011410.3389/fendo.2023.13316401331640Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cyclesLiu XingnanZhang NaPurposeThis study aims to create and validate a clinical model that predict the probability of fertilization failure in routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.MethodsThis study employed a retrospective methodology, gathering data from 1770 couples that used reproductive center’s of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University standard IVF fertilization between June 2015 and June 2023. 1062 were in the training set and 708 were in the validation set when it was randomly split into the training set and validation set in a 6:4 ratio. The study employed both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the factors those influence the failure of traditional in vitro fertilization. Based on the multiple regression model, a predictive model of traditional IVF fertilization failure was created. The calibration and decision curves were used to assess the effectiveness and therapeutic usefulness of this model.ResultsThe following factors independently predicted the probability of an unsuccessful fertilization: infertility years, basal oestrogen, the rate of mature oocytes, oligoasthenozoospermia, sperm concentration, sperm vitality, percentage of abnormal morphological sperm, and percentage of progressive motility (PR%).The receiver operating characteristic curve’s area under the curve (AUC) in the training set is 0.776 (95% CI: 0.740,0.812), while the validation set’s AUC is 0.756 (95% CI: 0.708,0.805), indicating a rather high clinical prediction capacity.ConclusionOur generated nomogram has the ability to forecast the probability of fertilization failure in couples undergoing IVF, hence can assist clinical staff in making informed decisions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1331640/fullin vitro fertilizationrescue ICSIclinical prediction modelfertilization failurenomogram
spellingShingle Liu Xingnan
Zhang Na
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles
Frontiers in Endocrinology
in vitro fertilization
rescue ICSI
clinical prediction model
fertilization failure
nomogram
title Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles
title_full Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles
title_fullStr Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles
title_short Development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine IVF cycles
title_sort development and validation of a clinical prediction model of fertilization failure during routine ivf cycles
topic in vitro fertilization
rescue ICSI
clinical prediction model
fertilization failure
nomogram
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1331640/full
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxingnan developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionmodeloffertilizationfailureduringroutineivfcycles
AT zhangna developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionmodeloffertilizationfailureduringroutineivfcycles