| Summary: | Various commercial auto-contouring solutions have emerged over past few years to address labor-intensiveness, and inter- and intra-operator variabilities issues of traditional manual anatomy contouring for head and neck (H&N) radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performances between RaySearch Laboratories deep learning (DL) and atlas-based auto-contouring tools for organs at risk (OARs) segmentation in the H&N RT with the manual contouring as reference. Forty-five H&N computed tomography datasets were used for the DL and atlas-based auto-contouring tools to contour 16 OARs and time required for the segmentation was measured. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD) and HD 95th-percentile (HD95) were used to evaluate geometric accuracy of OARs contoured by the DL and atlas-based auto-contouring tools. Paired sample <i>t</i>-test was employed to compare the mean DSC, HD, HD95, and contouring time values of the two groups. The DL auto-contouring approach achieved more consistent performance in OARs segmentation than its atlas-based approach, resulting in statistically significant time reduction of the whole segmentation process by 40% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The DL auto-contouring had statistically significantly higher mean DSC and lower HD and HD95 values (<i>p</i> < 0.001–0.009) for 10 out of 16 OARs. This study proves that the RaySearch Laboratories DL auto-contouring tool has significantly better clinical performances than its atlas-based approach.
|
|---|