Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System
The main aim of the research was to develop cognitive instruments that allow justification of decisions in national innovation policy. In the theoretical part of research fundamentals of national innovation policies of EU-members and Ukraine were compared to reveal factors that can accelerate innova...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mykolas Romeris University
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Public Policy and Administration |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/5239 |
| _version_ | 1819011625722576896 |
|---|---|
| author | Svitlana Labunska Nataliia Gavkalova Andriy Pylypenko Olena Prokopishyna |
| author_facet | Svitlana Labunska Nataliia Gavkalova Andriy Pylypenko Olena Prokopishyna |
| author_sort | Svitlana Labunska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The main aim of the research was to develop cognitive instruments that allow justification of decisions in national innovation policy. In the theoretical part of research fundamentals of national innovation policies of EU-members and Ukraine were compared to reveal factors that can accelerate innovation development. In the empirical part of research the analysis of innovation capability of Ukrainian enterprises was conducted based on financial, statistic and management reports and it confirmed that companies systematically conducted innovation activities, reached higher levels of innovation potential, innovative business opportunities and margin of economic security and, consequently, have more innovative capacities for innovation of all types.
The formation of cognitive analytical base allowed the application of scenario modelling at the level of public management of innovation activity. Cognitive modelling approach was justified firstly by increased volatility in economic conditions of modern realities of crisis in the national economy, and secondly high-cost and risky innovations, fast diffusion of information resources during the introduction of innovation processes, and thirdly, the presence of the mutual influence of objects of national innovation system. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:31:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-02bb7638a4644c398e247915ff75bfea |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1648-2603 2029-2872 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:31:08Z |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | Mykolas Romeris University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Public Policy and Administration |
| spelling | doaj.art-02bb7638a4644c398e247915ff75bfea2022-12-21T19:20:22ZengMykolas Romeris UniversityPublic Policy and Administration1648-26032029-28722019-09-01183Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation SystemSvitlana LabunskaNataliia GavkalovaAndriy PylypenkoOlena ProkopishynaThe main aim of the research was to develop cognitive instruments that allow justification of decisions in national innovation policy. In the theoretical part of research fundamentals of national innovation policies of EU-members and Ukraine were compared to reveal factors that can accelerate innovation development. In the empirical part of research the analysis of innovation capability of Ukrainian enterprises was conducted based on financial, statistic and management reports and it confirmed that companies systematically conducted innovation activities, reached higher levels of innovation potential, innovative business opportunities and margin of economic security and, consequently, have more innovative capacities for innovation of all types. The formation of cognitive analytical base allowed the application of scenario modelling at the level of public management of innovation activity. Cognitive modelling approach was justified firstly by increased volatility in economic conditions of modern realities of crisis in the national economy, and secondly high-cost and risky innovations, fast diffusion of information resources during the introduction of innovation processes, and thirdly, the presence of the mutual influence of objects of national innovation system.https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/5239cognitive analysisinnovationsstate budgetinnovative capabilitynational innovation policy |
| spellingShingle | Svitlana Labunska Nataliia Gavkalova Andriy Pylypenko Olena Prokopishyna Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System Public Policy and Administration cognitive analysis innovations state budget innovative capability national innovation policy |
| title | Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System |
| title_full | Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System |
| title_fullStr | Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System |
| title_short | Cognitive Instruments Of Public Management Accountability For Development Of National Innovation System |
| title_sort | cognitive instruments of public management accountability for development of national innovation system |
| topic | cognitive analysis innovations state budget innovative capability national innovation policy |
| url | https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/5239 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT svitlanalabunska cognitiveinstrumentsofpublicmanagementaccountabilityfordevelopmentofnationalinnovationsystem AT nataliiagavkalova cognitiveinstrumentsofpublicmanagementaccountabilityfordevelopmentofnationalinnovationsystem AT andriypylypenko cognitiveinstrumentsofpublicmanagementaccountabilityfordevelopmentofnationalinnovationsystem AT olenaprokopishyna cognitiveinstrumentsofpublicmanagementaccountabilityfordevelopmentofnationalinnovationsystem |