Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England

Note 1, Article 43 of the Securities Market Law, the board of directors of the stock exchange, along with the arbitration board, is competent to deal with damage claims in the process of the initial offering of securities; The board of directors of the stock exchange, in addition to the dignity and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nima Alijannejad, Hamid Abhari, Sam Mohammadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Mazandaran 2023-09-01
Series:پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3987_cbcd59d4d1722c72a7f40350565c45d9.pdf
_version_ 1827814211251601408
author Nima Alijannejad
Hamid Abhari
Sam Mohammadi
author_facet Nima Alijannejad
Hamid Abhari
Sam Mohammadi
author_sort Nima Alijannejad
collection DOAJ
description Note 1, Article 43 of the Securities Market Law, the board of directors of the stock exchange, along with the arbitration board, is competent to deal with damage claims in the process of the initial offering of securities; The board of directors of the stock exchange, in addition to the dignity and duties of the board of directors of public joint-stock companies, has other competences and duties regarding being a publisher and self-regulating organization. The above-mentioned regulation needs to be carefully examined in terms of the type, scope and limits of jurisdiction of the board of directors of the stock exchangeAnd by examining it, it is discovered that it is unclear about the procedure and organization of the hearing, as well as the issuance of the opinion and its implementation. In addition, the board of directors lacks any legal-judicial dignity, and the handling of lawsuits in it is faced with a fundamental problem, and due to the jurisdiction of two authorities with different organizations, the possibility of conflicting opinions issued in a single matter is very high. However, in the laws of other countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom, although other institutions other than the court are responsible for dealing with violations, creating compromises, arbitration between the injured party and the causer of the damage, and similar cases in the process of the initial offer, the judicial investigation of the issue is the responsibility of the judicial system. A detailed examination of the regulations on the topic of discussion and its adaptation to other countries makes clear the necessity of its narrow interpretation, modification and completion in the current situation where the capital market needs support; Therefore, this article aims to emphasize the necessity of amending the relevant regulations by carefully examining the existing internal and external sources and writings, while examining the various aspects of the board of directors' competence;  Especially since the preparations for amending the law have already started.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:42:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-02bd6baeb08d419f95ab88c2f51b92db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2423-7566
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:42:30Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher University of Mazandaran
record_format Article
series پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی
spelling doaj.art-02bd6baeb08d419f95ab88c2f51b92db2023-09-19T15:20:38ZengUniversity of Mazandaranپژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی2423-75662023-09-0172476510.22080/lps.2022.24414.14103987Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and EnglandNima Alijannejad0Hamid Abhari1Sam Mohammadi2Ph.D. in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran , Babolsar, IranProfessor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.Note 1, Article 43 of the Securities Market Law, the board of directors of the stock exchange, along with the arbitration board, is competent to deal with damage claims in the process of the initial offering of securities; The board of directors of the stock exchange, in addition to the dignity and duties of the board of directors of public joint-stock companies, has other competences and duties regarding being a publisher and self-regulating organization. The above-mentioned regulation needs to be carefully examined in terms of the type, scope and limits of jurisdiction of the board of directors of the stock exchangeAnd by examining it, it is discovered that it is unclear about the procedure and organization of the hearing, as well as the issuance of the opinion and its implementation. In addition, the board of directors lacks any legal-judicial dignity, and the handling of lawsuits in it is faced with a fundamental problem, and due to the jurisdiction of two authorities with different organizations, the possibility of conflicting opinions issued in a single matter is very high. However, in the laws of other countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom, although other institutions other than the court are responsible for dealing with violations, creating compromises, arbitration between the injured party and the causer of the damage, and similar cases in the process of the initial offer, the judicial investigation of the issue is the responsibility of the judicial system. A detailed examination of the regulations on the topic of discussion and its adaptation to other countries makes clear the necessity of its narrow interpretation, modification and completion in the current situation where the capital market needs support; Therefore, this article aims to emphasize the necessity of amending the relevant regulations by carefully examining the existing internal and external sources and writings, while examining the various aspects of the board of directors' competence;  Especially since the preparations for amending the law have already started.https://lps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3987_cbcd59d4d1722c72a7f40350565c45d9.pdfjurisdictionboard of directors of the stock exchangecivil liability litigationarbitrationconciliation
spellingShingle Nima Alijannejad
Hamid Abhari
Sam Mohammadi
Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England
پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی
jurisdiction
board of directors of the stock exchange
civil liability litigation
arbitration
conciliation
title Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England
title_full Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England
title_fullStr Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England
title_short Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England
title_sort comparative study of the jurisdiction of the stock exchange s board of directors in dealing with capital market disputes in the laws of iran america and england
topic jurisdiction
board of directors of the stock exchange
civil liability litigation
arbitration
conciliation
url https://lps.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3987_cbcd59d4d1722c72a7f40350565c45d9.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nimaalijannejad comparativestudyofthejurisdictionofthestockexchangesboardofdirectorsindealingwithcapitalmarketdisputesinthelawsofiranamericaandengland
AT hamidabhari comparativestudyofthejurisdictionofthestockexchangesboardofdirectorsindealingwithcapitalmarketdisputesinthelawsofiranamericaandengland
AT sammohammadi comparativestudyofthejurisdictionofthestockexchangesboardofdirectorsindealingwithcapitalmarketdisputesinthelawsofiranamericaandengland