Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study

Abstract Background The prognostic implication of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients is scarcely investigated. The objective was to determine how delirium subtypes are associated with hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes. Methods We performed a secondary anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Smit, Eveline J. A. Wiegers, Zoran Trogrlic, Wim J. R. Rietdijk, Diederik Gommers, Erwin Ista, Mathieu van der Jagt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00644-1
_version_ 1797977580540788736
author Lisa Smit
Eveline J. A. Wiegers
Zoran Trogrlic
Wim J. R. Rietdijk
Diederik Gommers
Erwin Ista
Mathieu van der Jagt
author_facet Lisa Smit
Eveline J. A. Wiegers
Zoran Trogrlic
Wim J. R. Rietdijk
Diederik Gommers
Erwin Ista
Mathieu van der Jagt
author_sort Lisa Smit
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The prognostic implication of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients is scarcely investigated. The objective was to determine how delirium subtypes are associated with hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes. Methods We performed a secondary analysis on data from a prospective multicenter study aimed at implementation of delirium-oriented measures, conducted between 2012 and 2015 in The Netherlands. We included adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Exclusion criteria were neurological admission diagnosis, persistent coma or ICU readmissions. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, and delirium subtypes (hypoactive, hyperactive, or mixed) were classified using the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale. The main outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, ICU length of stay, coma, mechanical ventilation, and use of antipsychotics, sedatives, benzodiazepines and opioids. Results Delirium occurred in 381 (24.4%) of 1564 patients (52.5% hypoactive, 39.1% mixed, 7.3% hyperactive). After case-mix adjustment, patients with mixed delirium had higher hospital mortality than non-delirious patients (OR 3.09, 95%CI 1.79–5.33, p = 0.001), whereas hypoactive patients did not (OR 1.34, 95%CI 0.71–2.55, p = 0.37). Similar results were found for ICU mortality. Compared to non-delirious patients, both subtypes had longer ICU stay, more coma, increased mechanical ventilation frequency and duration, and received more antipsychotics, sedatives, benzodiazepines and opioids. Except for coma and benzodiazepine use, the most unfavourable outcomes were observed in patients with mixed delirium. Conclusions Patients with mixed delirium had the most unfavourable outcomes, including higher mortality, compared with no delirium. These differences argue for distinguishing delirium subtypes in clinical practice and future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01952899.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:09:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-02ce1033b3554efe874c86f35c6dc9ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-0492
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:09:15Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Intensive Care
spelling doaj.art-02ce1033b3554efe874c86f35c6dc9ec2022-12-25T12:06:30ZengBMCJournal of Intensive Care2052-04922022-12-0110111010.1186/s40560-022-00644-1Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter studyLisa Smit0Eveline J. A. Wiegers1Zoran Trogrlic2Wim J. R. Rietdijk3Diederik Gommers4Erwin Ista5Mathieu van der Jagt6Department of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterIntensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Medical CenterDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterAbstract Background The prognostic implication of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients is scarcely investigated. The objective was to determine how delirium subtypes are associated with hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes. Methods We performed a secondary analysis on data from a prospective multicenter study aimed at implementation of delirium-oriented measures, conducted between 2012 and 2015 in The Netherlands. We included adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Exclusion criteria were neurological admission diagnosis, persistent coma or ICU readmissions. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, and delirium subtypes (hypoactive, hyperactive, or mixed) were classified using the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale. The main outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, ICU length of stay, coma, mechanical ventilation, and use of antipsychotics, sedatives, benzodiazepines and opioids. Results Delirium occurred in 381 (24.4%) of 1564 patients (52.5% hypoactive, 39.1% mixed, 7.3% hyperactive). After case-mix adjustment, patients with mixed delirium had higher hospital mortality than non-delirious patients (OR 3.09, 95%CI 1.79–5.33, p = 0.001), whereas hypoactive patients did not (OR 1.34, 95%CI 0.71–2.55, p = 0.37). Similar results were found for ICU mortality. Compared to non-delirious patients, both subtypes had longer ICU stay, more coma, increased mechanical ventilation frequency and duration, and received more antipsychotics, sedatives, benzodiazepines and opioids. Except for coma and benzodiazepine use, the most unfavourable outcomes were observed in patients with mixed delirium. Conclusions Patients with mixed delirium had the most unfavourable outcomes, including higher mortality, compared with no delirium. These differences argue for distinguishing delirium subtypes in clinical practice and future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01952899.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00644-1DeliriumCritical careIntensive care unitMortalitySubtypeCritical care outcomes
spellingShingle Lisa Smit
Eveline J. A. Wiegers
Zoran Trogrlic
Wim J. R. Rietdijk
Diederik Gommers
Erwin Ista
Mathieu van der Jagt
Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
Journal of Intensive Care
Delirium
Critical care
Intensive care unit
Mortality
Subtype
Critical care outcomes
title Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
title_full Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
title_short Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
title_sort prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study
topic Delirium
Critical care
Intensive care unit
Mortality
Subtype
Critical care outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00644-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lisasmit prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT evelinejawiegers prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT zorantrogrlic prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT wimjrrietdijk prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT diederikgommers prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT erwinista prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT mathieuvanderjagt prognosticsignificanceofdeliriumsubtypesincriticallyillmedicalandsurgicalpatientsasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivemulticenterstudy