A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression
We performed a retrospective chart review to examine the progress of patients with depression who received different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). rTMS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2012-12-01
|
| Series: | SAGE Open |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012470109 |
| _version_ | 1818151476523958272 |
|---|---|
| author | Kristie L. DeBlasio Aron Tendler |
| author_facet | Kristie L. DeBlasio Aron Tendler |
| author_sort | Kristie L. DeBlasio |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We performed a retrospective chart review to examine the progress of patients with depression who received different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). rTMS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for patients with various psychological and medical conditions. During treatment, a coil delivering a time-varying magnetic pulse placed over the scalp penetrates the skull, resulting in clinical improvement. There were 47 patients and three distinct treatment groups found: 10 Hz, 20 Hz, and a separate group who received both frequencies (10/20 Hz). The primary outcome indicator was the difference in Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) scores. Secondary outcomes included categorical indicators of remission, response, and partial response rates as assessed with the BDI-II. In all 3 groups, the majority of patients had depression that remitted, with the highest rate occurring in the 20 Hz group. There were similar response rates in the 10 Hz and 20 Hz groups. There were no patients in the 10/20 Hz group whose depression responded and the highest partial response and nonresponse rates occurred in this group. Although within-group differences were significant from baseline to end of treatment, there were no between-group differences. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T13:39:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-02dcddb75b2f46a9bb5ac51a1f76255e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2158-2440 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T13:39:26Z |
| publishDate | 2012-12-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | SAGE Open |
| spelling | doaj.art-02dcddb75b2f46a9bb5ac51a1f76255e2022-12-22T01:04:50ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402012-12-01210.1177/215824401247010910.1177_2158244012470109A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for DepressionKristie L. DeBlasio0Aron Tendler1 Advanced Mental Health Care, Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Advanced Mental Health Care, Royal Palm Beach, FL, USAWe performed a retrospective chart review to examine the progress of patients with depression who received different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). rTMS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for patients with various psychological and medical conditions. During treatment, a coil delivering a time-varying magnetic pulse placed over the scalp penetrates the skull, resulting in clinical improvement. There were 47 patients and three distinct treatment groups found: 10 Hz, 20 Hz, and a separate group who received both frequencies (10/20 Hz). The primary outcome indicator was the difference in Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) scores. Secondary outcomes included categorical indicators of remission, response, and partial response rates as assessed with the BDI-II. In all 3 groups, the majority of patients had depression that remitted, with the highest rate occurring in the 20 Hz group. There were similar response rates in the 10 Hz and 20 Hz groups. There were no patients in the 10/20 Hz group whose depression responded and the highest partial response and nonresponse rates occurred in this group. Although within-group differences were significant from baseline to end of treatment, there were no between-group differences.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012470109 |
| spellingShingle | Kristie L. DeBlasio Aron Tendler A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression SAGE Open |
| title | A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression |
| title_full | A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression |
| title_fullStr | A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression |
| title_short | A Retrospective Chart Review of 10 Hz Versus 20 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression |
| title_sort | retrospective chart review of 10 hz versus 20 hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012470109 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kristieldeblasio aretrospectivechartreviewof10hzversus20hzrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationfordepression AT arontendler aretrospectivechartreviewof10hzversus20hzrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationfordepression AT kristieldeblasio retrospectivechartreviewof10hzversus20hzrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationfordepression AT arontendler retrospectivechartreviewof10hzversus20hzrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationfordepression |