Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams

Abstract Background: The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hub supports multiple pilot award programs that engage cross-disciplinary Translational Teams. To support those teams, our Team Science group aims to offer a learning experience that is accessible, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betsy Rolland, Linda Scholl, Sainath Suryanarayanan, Peggy Hatfield, Kate Judge, Christine Sorkness, Elizabeth Burnside, Allan R. Brasier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005154/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156532887289856
author Betsy Rolland
Linda Scholl
Sainath Suryanarayanan
Peggy Hatfield
Kate Judge
Christine Sorkness
Elizabeth Burnside
Allan R. Brasier
author_facet Betsy Rolland
Linda Scholl
Sainath Suryanarayanan
Peggy Hatfield
Kate Judge
Christine Sorkness
Elizabeth Burnside
Allan R. Brasier
author_sort Betsy Rolland
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background: The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hub supports multiple pilot award programs that engage cross-disciplinary Translational Teams. To support those teams, our Team Science group aims to offer a learning experience that is accessible, active, and actionable. We identified Collaboration Planning as a high-impact intervention to stimulate team-building activities that provide Translational Team members with the skills to lead and participate in high-impact teams. Methods: We adapted the published materials on Collaboration Planning to develop a 90-minute facilitated intervention with questions in 10 areas, presuming no previous knowledge of Science of Team Science (SciTS) or team-science best practices. Attendees received a short follow-up survey and submitted a written collaboration plan with their first quarterly progress report. Results: Thirty-nine participants from 13 pilot teams from a wide range of disciplines engaged in these sessions. We found that teams struggled to know who to invite, that some of our questions were confusing and too grounded in the language of SciTS, and groups lacked plans for managing their information and communications. We identified several areas for improvement including ensuring that the process is flexible to meet the needs of different teams, continuing to evolve the questions so they resonate with teams, and the need to provide resources for areas where teams needed additional guidance, including information and data management, authorship policies, and conflict management. Conclusions: With further development and testing, Collaboration Planning has the potential to support Translational Teams in developing strong team dynamics and team functioning.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0304cb1cf5424413b3260e0cc6352474
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:17Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-0304cb1cf5424413b3260e0cc63524742023-03-09T12:31:02ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612021-01-01510.1017/cts.2020.515Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teamsBetsy Rolland0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4947-988XLinda Scholl1Sainath Suryanarayanan2Peggy Hatfield3Kate Judge4Christine Sorkness5Elizabeth Burnside6Allan R. Brasier7Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USANelson Institute for Environmental Studies, Center for Culture, History and Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Abstract Background: The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hub supports multiple pilot award programs that engage cross-disciplinary Translational Teams. To support those teams, our Team Science group aims to offer a learning experience that is accessible, active, and actionable. We identified Collaboration Planning as a high-impact intervention to stimulate team-building activities that provide Translational Team members with the skills to lead and participate in high-impact teams. Methods: We adapted the published materials on Collaboration Planning to develop a 90-minute facilitated intervention with questions in 10 areas, presuming no previous knowledge of Science of Team Science (SciTS) or team-science best practices. Attendees received a short follow-up survey and submitted a written collaboration plan with their first quarterly progress report. Results: Thirty-nine participants from 13 pilot teams from a wide range of disciplines engaged in these sessions. We found that teams struggled to know who to invite, that some of our questions were confusing and too grounded in the language of SciTS, and groups lacked plans for managing their information and communications. We identified several areas for improvement including ensuring that the process is flexible to meet the needs of different teams, continuing to evolve the questions so they resonate with teams, and the need to provide resources for areas where teams needed additional guidance, including information and data management, authorship policies, and conflict management. Conclusions: With further development and testing, Collaboration Planning has the potential to support Translational Teams in developing strong team dynamics and team functioning. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005154/type/journal_articleTeam sciencecollaborationcollaboration planningeducationworkforce development
spellingShingle Betsy Rolland
Linda Scholl
Sainath Suryanarayanan
Peggy Hatfield
Kate Judge
Christine Sorkness
Elizabeth Burnside
Allan R. Brasier
Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Team science
collaboration
collaboration planning
education
workforce development
title Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
title_full Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
title_fullStr Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
title_full_unstemmed Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
title_short Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
title_sort operationalization implementation and evaluation of collaboration planning a pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
topic Team science
collaboration
collaboration planning
education
workforce development
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005154/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT betsyrolland operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT lindascholl operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT sainathsuryanarayanan operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT peggyhatfield operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT katejudge operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT christinesorkness operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT elizabethburnside operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams
AT allanrbrasier operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams