Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams
Abstract Background: The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hub supports multiple pilot award programs that engage cross-disciplinary Translational Teams. To support those teams, our Team Science group aims to offer a learning experience that is accessible, a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005154/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811156532887289856 |
---|---|
author | Betsy Rolland Linda Scholl Sainath Suryanarayanan Peggy Hatfield Kate Judge Christine Sorkness Elizabeth Burnside Allan R. Brasier |
author_facet | Betsy Rolland Linda Scholl Sainath Suryanarayanan Peggy Hatfield Kate Judge Christine Sorkness Elizabeth Burnside Allan R. Brasier |
author_sort | Betsy Rolland |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Abstract
Background:
The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hub supports multiple pilot award programs that engage cross-disciplinary Translational Teams. To support those teams, our Team Science group aims to offer a learning experience that is accessible, active, and actionable. We identified Collaboration Planning as a high-impact intervention to stimulate team-building activities that provide Translational Team members with the skills to lead and participate in high-impact teams.
Methods:
We adapted the published materials on Collaboration Planning to develop a 90-minute facilitated intervention with questions in 10 areas, presuming no previous knowledge of Science of Team Science (SciTS) or team-science best practices. Attendees received a short follow-up survey and submitted a written collaboration plan with their first quarterly progress report.
Results:
Thirty-nine participants from 13 pilot teams from a wide range of disciplines engaged in these sessions. We found that teams struggled to know who to invite, that some of our questions were confusing and too grounded in the language of SciTS, and groups lacked plans for managing their information and communications. We identified several areas for improvement including ensuring that the process is flexible to meet the needs of different teams, continuing to evolve the questions so they resonate with teams, and the need to provide resources for areas where teams needed additional guidance, including information and data management, authorship policies, and conflict management.
Conclusions:
With further development and testing, Collaboration Planning has the potential to support Translational Teams in developing strong team dynamics and team functioning.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:53:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0304cb1cf5424413b3260e0cc6352474 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2059-8661 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:53:17Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
spelling | doaj.art-0304cb1cf5424413b3260e0cc63524742023-03-09T12:31:02ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612021-01-01510.1017/cts.2020.515Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teamsBetsy Rolland0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4947-988XLinda Scholl1Sainath Suryanarayanan2Peggy Hatfield3Kate Judge4Christine Sorkness5Elizabeth Burnside6Allan R. Brasier7Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USANelson Institute for Environmental Studies, Center for Culture, History and Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Abstract Background: The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hub supports multiple pilot award programs that engage cross-disciplinary Translational Teams. To support those teams, our Team Science group aims to offer a learning experience that is accessible, active, and actionable. We identified Collaboration Planning as a high-impact intervention to stimulate team-building activities that provide Translational Team members with the skills to lead and participate in high-impact teams. Methods: We adapted the published materials on Collaboration Planning to develop a 90-minute facilitated intervention with questions in 10 areas, presuming no previous knowledge of Science of Team Science (SciTS) or team-science best practices. Attendees received a short follow-up survey and submitted a written collaboration plan with their first quarterly progress report. Results: Thirty-nine participants from 13 pilot teams from a wide range of disciplines engaged in these sessions. We found that teams struggled to know who to invite, that some of our questions were confusing and too grounded in the language of SciTS, and groups lacked plans for managing their information and communications. We identified several areas for improvement including ensuring that the process is flexible to meet the needs of different teams, continuing to evolve the questions so they resonate with teams, and the need to provide resources for areas where teams needed additional guidance, including information and data management, authorship policies, and conflict management. Conclusions: With further development and testing, Collaboration Planning has the potential to support Translational Teams in developing strong team dynamics and team functioning. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005154/type/journal_articleTeam sciencecollaborationcollaboration planningeducationworkforce development |
spellingShingle | Betsy Rolland Linda Scholl Sainath Suryanarayanan Peggy Hatfield Kate Judge Christine Sorkness Elizabeth Burnside Allan R. Brasier Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Team science collaboration collaboration planning education workforce development |
title | Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams |
title_full | Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams |
title_fullStr | Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams |
title_full_unstemmed | Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams |
title_short | Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams |
title_sort | operationalization implementation and evaluation of collaboration planning a pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams |
topic | Team science collaboration collaboration planning education workforce development |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120005154/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT betsyrolland operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT lindascholl operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT sainathsuryanarayanan operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT peggyhatfield operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT katejudge operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT christinesorkness operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT elizabethburnside operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams AT allanrbrasier operationalizationimplementationandevaluationofcollaborationplanningapilotinterventionalstudyofnascenttranslationalteams |