A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults

Abstract Hearing thresholds form the gold standard assessment in Audiology clinics. However, ~ 10% of adult patients seeking audiological care for self-perceived hearing deficits have thresholds that are normal. Currently, a diagnostic assessment for auditory processing disorder (APD) remains one of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victoria E. Cancel, Jacie R. McHaney, Virginia Milne, Catherine Palmer, Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0
_version_ 1797452824871698432
author Victoria E. Cancel
Jacie R. McHaney
Virginia Milne
Catherine Palmer
Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
author_facet Victoria E. Cancel
Jacie R. McHaney
Virginia Milne
Catherine Palmer
Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
author_sort Victoria E. Cancel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Hearing thresholds form the gold standard assessment in Audiology clinics. However, ~ 10% of adult patients seeking audiological care for self-perceived hearing deficits have thresholds that are normal. Currently, a diagnostic assessment for auditory processing disorder (APD) remains one of the few viable avenues of further care for this patient population, yet there are no standard guidelines for referrals. Here, we identified tests within the APD testing battery that could provide a rapid screener to inform APD referrals in adults. We first analyzed records from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Audiology database to identify adult patients with self-perceived hearing difficulties despite normal audiometric thresholds. We then looked at the patients who were referred for APD testing. We examined test performances, correlational relationships, and classification accuracies. Patients experienced most difficulties within the dichotic domain of testing. Additionally, accuracies calculated from sensitivities and specificities revealed the words-in-noise (WIN), the Random Dichotic Digits Task (RDDT) and Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN) tests had the highest classification accuracies. The addition of these tests have the greatest promise as a quick screener during routine audiological assessments to help identify adult patients who may be referred for APD assessment and resulting treatment plans.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:14:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0315f82dbedd40d0ab09d63d7091a961
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:14:16Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-0315f82dbedd40d0ab09d63d7091a9612023-11-26T13:10:16ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-08-0113111110.1038/s41598-023-40645-0A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adultsVictoria E. Cancel0Jacie R. McHaney1Virginia Milne2Catherine Palmer3Aravindakshan Parthasarathy4Department of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of PittsburghDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of PittsburghDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of PittsburghDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of PittsburghDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of PittsburghAbstract Hearing thresholds form the gold standard assessment in Audiology clinics. However, ~ 10% of adult patients seeking audiological care for self-perceived hearing deficits have thresholds that are normal. Currently, a diagnostic assessment for auditory processing disorder (APD) remains one of the few viable avenues of further care for this patient population, yet there are no standard guidelines for referrals. Here, we identified tests within the APD testing battery that could provide a rapid screener to inform APD referrals in adults. We first analyzed records from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Audiology database to identify adult patients with self-perceived hearing difficulties despite normal audiometric thresholds. We then looked at the patients who were referred for APD testing. We examined test performances, correlational relationships, and classification accuracies. Patients experienced most difficulties within the dichotic domain of testing. Additionally, accuracies calculated from sensitivities and specificities revealed the words-in-noise (WIN), the Random Dichotic Digits Task (RDDT) and Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN) tests had the highest classification accuracies. The addition of these tests have the greatest promise as a quick screener during routine audiological assessments to help identify adult patients who may be referred for APD assessment and resulting treatment plans.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0
spellingShingle Victoria E. Cancel
Jacie R. McHaney
Virginia Milne
Catherine Palmer
Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
Scientific Reports
title A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
title_full A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
title_fullStr A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
title_full_unstemmed A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
title_short A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
title_sort data driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0
work_keys_str_mv AT victoriaecancel adatadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT jaciermchaney adatadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT virginiamilne adatadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT catherinepalmer adatadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT aravindakshanparthasarathy adatadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT victoriaecancel datadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT jaciermchaney datadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT virginiamilne datadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT catherinepalmer datadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults
AT aravindakshanparthasarathy datadrivenapproachtoidentifyarapidscreenerforauditoryprocessingdisordertestingreferralsinadults