Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis

Edward J Mills1, Eric Druyts1, Isabella Ghement2, Milo A Puhan31Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Ghement Statistical Consulting Company, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada; 3Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghement I, Druyts E, Mills EJ, Puhan MA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2011-03-01
Series:Clinical Epidemiology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/pharmacotherapies-for-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-a-multiple-a6865
_version_ 1818395236889526272
author Ghement I
Druyts E
Mills EJ
Puhan MA
author_facet Ghement I
Druyts E
Mills EJ
Puhan MA
author_sort Ghement I
collection DOAJ
description Edward J Mills1, Eric Druyts1, Isabella Ghement2, Milo A Puhan31Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Ghement Statistical Consulting Company, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada; 3Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USABackground: Most patients with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive long-acting bronchodilators (LABA) for symptom control. It is, however, unclear if and what drug treatments should be added to LABAs to reduce exacerbations, which is an important goal of COPD management. Since current guidelines cannot make strong recommendations yet, our aim was to determine the relative efficacy of existing treatments and combinations to reduce the risk for COPD exacerbations.Methods: We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating long-acting ß2 agonists (LABA), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), inhaled glucocorticosterioids (ICS), and the phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor roflumilast, and combinations of these interventions in moderate to severe COPD populations. Our primary outcome was the event rate of exacerbations. We conducted a random-effects Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) and applied several sensitivity analyses. In particular, we confirmed our findings using a binomial MTC analysis examining whether a patient experienced at least one exacerbation event or not during the trial. We also used an additive assumption to calculate the combined effects of treatments that were not included in the systematic review.Results: Twenty-six studies provided data on the total number of exacerbations and/or the mean annual rate of exacerbations among a combined 36,312 patients. There were a total of 10 treatment combinations in the MTC and 15 in the additive analysis. Compared with all other treatments, the combination of roflumilast plus LAMA exhibited the largest treatment effects, and had the highest probability (45%) of being the best first-line treatment. This was consistent whether applying the incidence rate analysis or the binomial analysis. When applying the additive assumption, most point estimates suggested that roflumilast may provide additional benefit by further reducing exacerbations.Conclusions: Using various meta-analytic approaches, our study demonstrates that depending on the choice of drug, combined treatments offer a therapeutic advantage.Keywords: exacerbations, MTC analysis, clinical trials, roflumilast 
first_indexed 2024-12-14T06:13:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-031ccb8a2b0e43bda1c7f8a02ae0e9e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1349
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T06:13:54Z
publishDate 2011-03-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Epidemiology
spelling doaj.art-031ccb8a2b0e43bda1c7f8a02ae0e9e42022-12-21T23:14:05ZengDove Medical PressClinical Epidemiology1179-13492011-03-012011Issue 1107129Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysisGhement IDruyts EMills EJPuhan MAEdward J Mills1, Eric Druyts1, Isabella Ghement2, Milo A Puhan31Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Ghement Statistical Consulting Company, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada; 3Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USABackground: Most patients with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive long-acting bronchodilators (LABA) for symptom control. It is, however, unclear if and what drug treatments should be added to LABAs to reduce exacerbations, which is an important goal of COPD management. Since current guidelines cannot make strong recommendations yet, our aim was to determine the relative efficacy of existing treatments and combinations to reduce the risk for COPD exacerbations.Methods: We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating long-acting ß2 agonists (LABA), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), inhaled glucocorticosterioids (ICS), and the phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor roflumilast, and combinations of these interventions in moderate to severe COPD populations. Our primary outcome was the event rate of exacerbations. We conducted a random-effects Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) and applied several sensitivity analyses. In particular, we confirmed our findings using a binomial MTC analysis examining whether a patient experienced at least one exacerbation event or not during the trial. We also used an additive assumption to calculate the combined effects of treatments that were not included in the systematic review.Results: Twenty-six studies provided data on the total number of exacerbations and/or the mean annual rate of exacerbations among a combined 36,312 patients. There were a total of 10 treatment combinations in the MTC and 15 in the additive analysis. Compared with all other treatments, the combination of roflumilast plus LAMA exhibited the largest treatment effects, and had the highest probability (45%) of being the best first-line treatment. This was consistent whether applying the incidence rate analysis or the binomial analysis. When applying the additive assumption, most point estimates suggested that roflumilast may provide additional benefit by further reducing exacerbations.Conclusions: Using various meta-analytic approaches, our study demonstrates that depending on the choice of drug, combined treatments offer a therapeutic advantage.Keywords: exacerbations, MTC analysis, clinical trials, roflumilast http://www.dovepress.com/pharmacotherapies-for-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-a-multiple-a6865
spellingShingle Ghement I
Druyts E
Mills EJ
Puhan MA
Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
Clinical Epidemiology
title Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_full Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_short Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_sort pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease a multiple treatment comparison meta analysis
url http://www.dovepress.com/pharmacotherapies-for-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-a-multiple-a6865
work_keys_str_mv AT ghementi pharmacotherapiesforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamultipletreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT druytse pharmacotherapiesforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamultipletreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT millsej pharmacotherapiesforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamultipletreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT puhanma pharmacotherapiesforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamultipletreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis