Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?

Abstract Objective Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well‐studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse tes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole T. Jiam, Yi Cai, Katherine C. Wai, Colleen Polite, Kurt Kramer, Jeffrey D. Sharon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52
_version_ 1797857792243007488
author Nicole T. Jiam
Yi Cai
Katherine C. Wai
Colleen Polite
Kurt Kramer
Jeffrey D. Sharon
author_facet Nicole T. Jiam
Yi Cai
Katherine C. Wai
Colleen Polite
Kurt Kramer
Jeffrey D. Sharon
author_sort Nicole T. Jiam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well‐studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT) in subjects undergoing CI surgery evaluation. Study Design Setting, and Subjects We conducted a retrospective review of 64 adult CI candidacy cases between 2017 and 2020 at a tertiary health care center. Methods All patients underwent audiometric testing and evaluation by the senior author. Patients with an abnormal catch‐up saccade contralateral to their worse hearing ear during cHIT were referred for formal vestibular testing. Outcomes included clinical and formal vestibular results, operated ear with regard to audiometric and vestibular results, and postoperative vertigo. Results Among all CI candidates, 44% (n = 28) reported preoperative disequilibrium symptoms. Overall, 62% (n = 40) of the cHITs were normal, 33% (n = 21) were abnormal, and 5% (n = 3) were inconclusive. There was one patient who presented with a false positive cHIT. Among the patients who endorsed disequilibrium, 43% had a positive preoperative cHIT. Fourteen percent of the subjects (n = 9) without disequilibrium had an abnormal cHIT. In this cohort, bilateral vestibular impairment (71%) was more common than unilateral vestibular impairment (29%). In 3% of the cases (n = 2), surgical management was revisited or altered due to cHIT findings. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the CI candidate population. Self‐reported assessments of vestibular function are often not congruent with cHIT results. Clinicians should consider incorporating cHITs as part of the preoperative physical exam to potentially avoid bilateral vestibular dysfunction in a minority of patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:02:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-031e54a2fd8e414fa010e0f1a1ba38ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-8811
2589-1081
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:02:32Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj.art-031e54a2fd8e414fa010e0f1a1ba38ea2023-03-29T06:44:45ZengWileyWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2095-88112589-10812023-03-0191455210.1002/wjo2.52Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?Nicole T. Jiam0Yi Cai1Katherine C. Wai2Colleen Polite3Kurt Kramer4Jeffrey D. Sharon5Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USADepartment of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USAAbstract Objective Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well‐studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT) in subjects undergoing CI surgery evaluation. Study Design Setting, and Subjects We conducted a retrospective review of 64 adult CI candidacy cases between 2017 and 2020 at a tertiary health care center. Methods All patients underwent audiometric testing and evaluation by the senior author. Patients with an abnormal catch‐up saccade contralateral to their worse hearing ear during cHIT were referred for formal vestibular testing. Outcomes included clinical and formal vestibular results, operated ear with regard to audiometric and vestibular results, and postoperative vertigo. Results Among all CI candidates, 44% (n = 28) reported preoperative disequilibrium symptoms. Overall, 62% (n = 40) of the cHITs were normal, 33% (n = 21) were abnormal, and 5% (n = 3) were inconclusive. There was one patient who presented with a false positive cHIT. Among the patients who endorsed disequilibrium, 43% had a positive preoperative cHIT. Fourteen percent of the subjects (n = 9) without disequilibrium had an abnormal cHIT. In this cohort, bilateral vestibular impairment (71%) was more common than unilateral vestibular impairment (29%). In 3% of the cases (n = 2), surgical management was revisited or altered due to cHIT findings. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the CI candidate population. Self‐reported assessments of vestibular function are often not congruent with cHIT results. Clinicians should consider incorporating cHITs as part of the preoperative physical exam to potentially avoid bilateral vestibular dysfunction in a minority of patients.https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52clinical head impulse testcochlear implantvestibular functionvestibular lossvestibular testing
spellingShingle Nicole T. Jiam
Yi Cai
Katherine C. Wai
Colleen Polite
Kurt Kramer
Jeffrey D. Sharon
Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
clinical head impulse test
cochlear implant
vestibular function
vestibular loss
vestibular testing
title Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_full Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_fullStr Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_full_unstemmed Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_short Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_sort is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation
topic clinical head impulse test
cochlear implant
vestibular function
vestibular loss
vestibular testing
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoletjiam istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT yicai istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT katherinecwai istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT colleenpolite istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT kurtkramer istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT jeffreydsharon istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation