An arbitration dilemma: party-appointed experts vs. tribunal-appointed experts. A comparative study
Arbitration, as an alternate method of solving disputes, is greatly reliant on its capacity to offer an efficient procedure, in terms of costs involved and time consumed to reach a decision on parties’ disputes. Taking of evidence in a cost and time effective manner is, therefore, a vital issue, one...
Main Author: | Ioan Schiau |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bucharest University of Economic Studies
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Juridical Tribune |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An12v3/2.%20Ioan%20Schiau%20EN.pdf |
Similar Items
-
An Alternative to the Adversarial: Studies on Challenges of Court-appointed Experts
by: Zhuhao Wang
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Key criteria in appointment of arbitrators in international arbitration
by: Bazil Oglindă
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Strengthening the Position of Expert Witness in Judicial Process
by: Indriati Amarini, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Expert opinion in criminal matters based on the new Law on criminal procedure
by: Grubač Momčilo
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Designating appointing authorities in UNCITRAL arbitration: Wrong and imperfect designations
by: Stanivuković Maja D.
Published: (2020-01-01)