Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection

Ghosting and orbiting occur when a relationship is ended unilaterally by suddenly withdrawing from all communication and without explanation. However, in orbiting, the disengager still follows the victims on social networking sites after the breakup. With the advent of the digital era, these practi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luca Pancani, Nicolas Aureli, Paolo Riva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Masaryk University 2022-04-01
Series:Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/14691
_version_ 1827310965717204992
author Luca Pancani
Nicolas Aureli
Paolo Riva
author_facet Luca Pancani
Nicolas Aureli
Paolo Riva
author_sort Luca Pancani
collection DOAJ
description Ghosting and orbiting occur when a relationship is ended unilaterally by suddenly withdrawing from all communication and without explanation. However, in orbiting, the disengager still follows the victims on social networking sites after the breakup. With the advent of the digital era, these practices have become increasingly common, gaining attention from psychology research. Within the theoretical framework of social exclusion, the present study (N = 176) investigated victims’ consequences of ghosting and orbiting, considering the two breakup strategies as instances of ostracism. Participants were invited to fill an online survey and randomly assigned to recall an episode of ghosting, orbiting, or rejection. Following the recall task, participants completed a series of questionnaires to measure the typical outcomes threatened by ostracism (i.e., emotions, basic psychological needs, breakup’s cognitive evaluation, and aggressive inclinations). The results showed a consistent pattern across most of the constructs measured. Specifically, ghosting led to worse outcomes than rejection, whereas the disengagers’ ambiguous signals characterizing orbiting seemed to buffer the victims partially from the consequences of relationship dissolution. Results are discussed in the light of social exclusion literature, adding to the growing research on ghosting.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T20:09:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0334642f93e74c7ca040d51d0104505a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1802-7962
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:09:29Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Masaryk University
record_format Article
series Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
spelling doaj.art-0334642f93e74c7ca040d51d0104505a2024-03-23T13:14:19ZengMasaryk UniversityCyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace1802-79622022-04-0116210.5817/CP2022-2-9Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejectionLuca Pancani0Nicolas Aureli1Paolo Riva2University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy Ghosting and orbiting occur when a relationship is ended unilaterally by suddenly withdrawing from all communication and without explanation. However, in orbiting, the disengager still follows the victims on social networking sites after the breakup. With the advent of the digital era, these practices have become increasingly common, gaining attention from psychology research. Within the theoretical framework of social exclusion, the present study (N = 176) investigated victims’ consequences of ghosting and orbiting, considering the two breakup strategies as instances of ostracism. Participants were invited to fill an online survey and randomly assigned to recall an episode of ghosting, orbiting, or rejection. Following the recall task, participants completed a series of questionnaires to measure the typical outcomes threatened by ostracism (i.e., emotions, basic psychological needs, breakup’s cognitive evaluation, and aggressive inclinations). The results showed a consistent pattern across most of the constructs measured. Specifically, ghosting led to worse outcomes than rejection, whereas the disengagers’ ambiguous signals characterizing orbiting seemed to buffer the victims partially from the consequences of relationship dissolution. Results are discussed in the light of social exclusion literature, adding to the growing research on ghosting. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/14691ghostingorbitingsocial exclusionostracismdigital technologies
spellingShingle Luca Pancani
Nicolas Aureli
Paolo Riva
Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
ghosting
orbiting
social exclusion
ostracism
digital technologies
title Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection
title_full Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection
title_fullStr Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection
title_full_unstemmed Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection
title_short Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection
title_sort relationship dissolution strategies comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting orbiting and rejection
topic ghosting
orbiting
social exclusion
ostracism
digital technologies
url https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/14691
work_keys_str_mv AT lucapancani relationshipdissolutionstrategiescomparingthepsychologicalconsequencesofghostingorbitingandrejection
AT nicolasaureli relationshipdissolutionstrategiescomparingthepsychologicalconsequencesofghostingorbitingandrejection
AT paoloriva relationshipdissolutionstrategiescomparingthepsychologicalconsequencesofghostingorbitingandrejection