Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively

We do not know whether men who access Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) are contact child-sex offenders using technology - or a new and different type of child sex offender. This study compares men who were charged with Contact Child Sexual Abuse (CCSA) (n = 95) exclusively, and men who were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel J. Nicol, Danielle A. Harris, Mark R. Kebbell, James Ogilvie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology 2021-12-01
Series:Sexual Offending
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sotrap.psychopen.eu/index.php/sotrap/article/view/4301
_version_ 1797964093937680384
author Samuel J. Nicol
Danielle A. Harris
Mark R. Kebbell
James Ogilvie
author_facet Samuel J. Nicol
Danielle A. Harris
Mark R. Kebbell
James Ogilvie
author_sort Samuel J. Nicol
collection DOAJ
description We do not know whether men who access Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) are contact child-sex offenders using technology - or a new and different type of child sex offender. This study compares men who were charged with Contact Child Sexual Abuse (CCSA) (n = 95) exclusively, and men who were charged with offences involving online CSEM (n = 99) exclusively. This is the first study of its kind in Australia, the first to divide participants into mutually exclusive offending type groups and to do this using police data. Logistic regression results indicated that CSEM offenders were significantly more likely to be older, more likely to be employed, have fewer criminal charges and supervision violations compared to CCSA offenders. The findings further highlighted the heterogeneity of those charged with child sexual offences based on offence typology. The identification of demographic, lifestyle and interpersonal characteristic differences between online CSEM and CCSA offenders’ questions the use of uniform approaches to community supervision and treatment protocols. The implications of these findings are discussed in light of an increased volume of people charged with CSEM offences.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:38:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-033f677466be489fa2bd682bb1902601
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2699-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:38:37Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
record_format Article
series Sexual Offending
spelling doaj.art-033f677466be489fa2bd682bb19026012023-01-03T08:35:20ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologySexual Offending2699-84402021-12-011610.5964/sotrap.4301sotrap.4301Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse ExclusivelySamuel J. Nicol0Danielle A. Harris1Mark R. Kebbell2James Ogilvie3Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Queensland, AustraliaGriffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Queensland, AustraliaGriffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Queensland, AustraliaWe do not know whether men who access Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) are contact child-sex offenders using technology - or a new and different type of child sex offender. This study compares men who were charged with Contact Child Sexual Abuse (CCSA) (n = 95) exclusively, and men who were charged with offences involving online CSEM (n = 99) exclusively. This is the first study of its kind in Australia, the first to divide participants into mutually exclusive offending type groups and to do this using police data. Logistic regression results indicated that CSEM offenders were significantly more likely to be older, more likely to be employed, have fewer criminal charges and supervision violations compared to CCSA offenders. The findings further highlighted the heterogeneity of those charged with child sexual offences based on offence typology. The identification of demographic, lifestyle and interpersonal characteristic differences between online CSEM and CCSA offenders’ questions the use of uniform approaches to community supervision and treatment protocols. The implications of these findings are discussed in light of an increased volume of people charged with CSEM offences.https://sotrap.psychopen.eu/index.php/sotrap/article/view/4301child sexual exploitation material (csem)child sexual abusecontact abusepolice datacharged
spellingShingle Samuel J. Nicol
Danielle A. Harris
Mark R. Kebbell
James Ogilvie
Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively
Sexual Offending
child sexual exploitation material (csem)
child sexual abuse
contact abuse
police data
charged
title Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively
title_full Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively
title_fullStr Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively
title_full_unstemmed Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively
title_short Online Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Comparison From Police Data on Men Charged With Child Sexual Exploitation Material Exclusively and Men Charged With Contact Child Sexual Abuse Exclusively
title_sort online child sexual exploitation material a comparison from police data on men charged with child sexual exploitation material exclusively and men charged with contact child sexual abuse exclusively
topic child sexual exploitation material (csem)
child sexual abuse
contact abuse
police data
charged
url https://sotrap.psychopen.eu/index.php/sotrap/article/view/4301
work_keys_str_mv AT samueljnicol onlinechildsexualexploitationmaterialacomparisonfrompolicedataonmenchargedwithchildsexualexploitationmaterialexclusivelyandmenchargedwithcontactchildsexualabuseexclusively
AT danielleaharris onlinechildsexualexploitationmaterialacomparisonfrompolicedataonmenchargedwithchildsexualexploitationmaterialexclusivelyandmenchargedwithcontactchildsexualabuseexclusively
AT markrkebbell onlinechildsexualexploitationmaterialacomparisonfrompolicedataonmenchargedwithchildsexualexploitationmaterialexclusivelyandmenchargedwithcontactchildsexualabuseexclusively
AT jamesogilvie onlinechildsexualexploitationmaterialacomparisonfrompolicedataonmenchargedwithchildsexualexploitationmaterialexclusivelyandmenchargedwithcontactchildsexualabuseexclusively