Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment

In recent years, co-creation and collaboration platforms to create and deliver new products and services have taken a step forward; this has led to the development of a new active involvement of users, who from co-designers have become independent designers, even if not experts. Co-design is dynamic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincenzo Maselli, Giulia Panadisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-01-01
Series:Design Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470122000154/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156411094138880
author Vincenzo Maselli
Giulia Panadisi
author_facet Vincenzo Maselli
Giulia Panadisi
author_sort Vincenzo Maselli
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, co-creation and collaboration platforms to create and deliver new products and services have taken a step forward; this has led to the development of a new active involvement of users, who from co-designers have become independent designers, even if not experts. Co-design is dynamic and provides the tools to generate democratic design processes guided by the users themselves. The democratization of design tools is the premise for a new paradigm defined ‘Diffuse Design’ by Manzini (2015). This contribution explores the approaches of open design and open production with particular attention to the field of visual communication and the production of motion design artifacts. After an introduction to the co-design framework, the main open-production visual communication platforms are presented to offer an overview of the topic. Next, the potential of online platforms to enable non-designers to produce animated artifacts is explored by examining student projects in a motion design University course. The most significant outputs of the student experience are then described and critically analyzed. Finally, the conclusions investigate the different perspectives for reading the democratization of tools for creating visual artifacts and lay the foundations for future lines of research.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:50:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-034b005e81e24626b4227830718f16c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-4701
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:50:02Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Design Science
spelling doaj.art-034b005e81e24626b4227830718f16c02023-03-09T12:32:05ZengCambridge University PressDesign Science2053-47012022-01-01810.1017/dsj.2022.15Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experimentVincenzo Maselli0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-7972Giulia Panadisi1Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, University G. D’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, ItalyIn recent years, co-creation and collaboration platforms to create and deliver new products and services have taken a step forward; this has led to the development of a new active involvement of users, who from co-designers have become independent designers, even if not experts. Co-design is dynamic and provides the tools to generate democratic design processes guided by the users themselves. The democratization of design tools is the premise for a new paradigm defined ‘Diffuse Design’ by Manzini (2015). This contribution explores the approaches of open design and open production with particular attention to the field of visual communication and the production of motion design artifacts. After an introduction to the co-design framework, the main open-production visual communication platforms are presented to offer an overview of the topic. Next, the potential of online platforms to enable non-designers to produce animated artifacts is explored by examining student projects in a motion design University course. The most significant outputs of the student experience are then described and critically analyzed. Finally, the conclusions investigate the different perspectives for reading the democratization of tools for creating visual artifacts and lay the foundations for future lines of research.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470122000154/type/journal_articlemotion designdiffuse designopen production platformsvisual communicationeducation
spellingShingle Vincenzo Maselli
Giulia Panadisi
Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
Design Science
motion design
diffuse design
open production platforms
visual communication
education
title Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
title_full Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
title_fullStr Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
title_full_unstemmed Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
title_short Motion design and visual communication in the era of ‘diffuse design’ paradigm: analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
title_sort motion design and visual communication in the era of diffuse design paradigm analysis and evaluation of a didactic experiment
topic motion design
diffuse design
open production platforms
visual communication
education
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470122000154/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenzomaselli motiondesignandvisualcommunicationintheeraofdiffusedesignparadigmanalysisandevaluationofadidacticexperiment
AT giuliapanadisi motiondesignandvisualcommunicationintheeraofdiffusedesignparadigmanalysisandevaluationofadidacticexperiment