Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services

There is a broad acceptance to depicting the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being using the concept of ecosystem services, emanating in large from the findings and research published in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 . While the generic concept of ecosystem services prov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Eigenraam, Carl Obst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 2018-11-01
Series:Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718
_version_ 1827852431297347584
author Mark Eigenraam
Carl Obst
author_facet Mark Eigenraam
Carl Obst
author_sort Mark Eigenraam
collection DOAJ
description There is a broad acceptance to depicting the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being using the concept of ecosystem services, emanating in large from the findings and research published in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 . While the generic concept of ecosystem services provides an excellent platform for discussion, the ongoing lack of clarity surrounding the definition, classification and measurement of ecosystem services, is emerging as a barrier to more extensive collaboration across disciplines. This paper applies the principles of national accounting to bring additional rigor and consistency to the discussion on ecosystem services. In this paper we revisit four fundamental aspects of the System of National Accounts (SNA) that underpin the measurement of the economy, namely, the definition of economic units; the definition of production; the recording of transactions and the recording assets. By considering each of these aspects in the context of the United Nations’ System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, the paper presents a framework to describe the relationship between ecosystems and human activity that can then be used to consistently define, classify, measure and account for ecosystem services.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:50:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c0272
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2096-4129
2332-8878
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:50:09Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
record_format Article
series Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
spelling doaj.art-0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c02722023-09-02T07:05:46ZengAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Ecosystem Health and Sustainability2096-41292332-88782018-11-0141124726010.1080/20964129.2018.15247181524718Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem servicesMark Eigenraam0Carl Obst1Institute for the Development of Environmental-Economic Accounting (IDEEA)Institute for the Development of Environmental-Economic Accounting (IDEEA)There is a broad acceptance to depicting the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being using the concept of ecosystem services, emanating in large from the findings and research published in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 . While the generic concept of ecosystem services provides an excellent platform for discussion, the ongoing lack of clarity surrounding the definition, classification and measurement of ecosystem services, is emerging as a barrier to more extensive collaboration across disciplines. This paper applies the principles of national accounting to bring additional rigor and consistency to the discussion on ecosystem services. In this paper we revisit four fundamental aspects of the System of National Accounts (SNA) that underpin the measurement of the economy, namely, the definition of economic units; the definition of production; the recording of transactions and the recording assets. By considering each of these aspects in the context of the United Nations’ System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, the paper presents a framework to describe the relationship between ecosystems and human activity that can then be used to consistently define, classify, measure and account for ecosystem services.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718Ecosystem accountingsystem of national accountsecosystem servicesecosystem assetenvironmental accounting
spellingShingle Mark Eigenraam
Carl Obst
Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Ecosystem accounting
system of national accounts
ecosystem services
ecosystem asset
environmental accounting
title Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_full Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_fullStr Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_full_unstemmed Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_short Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_sort extending the production boundary of the system of national accounts sna to classify and account for ecosystem services
topic Ecosystem accounting
system of national accounts
ecosystem services
ecosystem asset
environmental accounting
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718
work_keys_str_mv AT markeigenraam extendingtheproductionboundaryofthesystemofnationalaccountssnatoclassifyandaccountforecosystemservices
AT carlobst extendingtheproductionboundaryofthesystemofnationalaccountssnatoclassifyandaccountforecosystemservices