Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital

Introduction: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children. Due to the better understanding of biology, intensive multi-agent chemotherapy and improved supportive care, ALL is curable in majority of children. Induction phase is the most intense and critical phase of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanvi Khanna, Nitika Agrawal, Kunal Das, Brahma Prakash Kalra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/16087/51295_CE[Ra1]_F(KR)_PF1(SC_SS)_PFA(SC_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1828040396475727872
author Tanvi Khanna
Nitika Agrawal
Kunal Das
Brahma Prakash Kalra
author_facet Tanvi Khanna
Nitika Agrawal
Kunal Das
Brahma Prakash Kalra
author_sort Tanvi Khanna
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children. Due to the better understanding of biology, intensive multi-agent chemotherapy and improved supportive care, ALL is curable in majority of children. Induction phase is the most intense and critical phase of therapy. Aim: To examine the feasibility of high-intensity induction and its tolerance in a resource-limited setting in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis was done on children admitted for ALL treatment. Data was collected for January 2016 to July 2018, regarding baseline characteristics, tolerance to induction therapy, morbidity, mortality, deviations from protocol, and induction outcomes among children with ALL treated at a tertiary care teaching hospital (Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttrakhand, India). Confirmed cases of ALL with age upto 18 years, who took more than a week of planned induction were included in the study. Data was analysed using Chi-square and Fisher’s-exact test. Results: Four-drug induction was feasible and given to 76 patients during the study period. Mean age of the group was 9.3 years. Male: female ratio was 1.3:1. Remission was achieved in 63 (82.8%) patients. Four deaths occurred, and were attributed to infection. Hyperglycaemia (4), CNS events (2), peripherally inserted central line related thrombosis (2) and pulmonary tuberculosis (1) were noted. Febrile neutropenia was noted in 65 cases and seven cases required ICU care; two of them succumbed in the ICU. Baseline blood parameters, subtype of disease, protocol of treatment and age did not affect the induction outcome statistically. Conclusion: Intensive induction chemotherapy has varying complications and can be employed even in resource-limited settings with acceptable results.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:55:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-035b91bcaecb4fc4bee2ff16580e199b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:55:55Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-035b91bcaecb4fc4bee2ff16580e199b2023-02-07T07:11:22ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2022-03-01163SC01SC0510.7860/JCDR/2022/51295.16087Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching HospitalTanvi Khanna0Nitika Agrawal1Kunal Das2Brahma Prakash Kalra3Former Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.Introduction: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children. Due to the better understanding of biology, intensive multi-agent chemotherapy and improved supportive care, ALL is curable in majority of children. Induction phase is the most intense and critical phase of therapy. Aim: To examine the feasibility of high-intensity induction and its tolerance in a resource-limited setting in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis was done on children admitted for ALL treatment. Data was collected for January 2016 to July 2018, regarding baseline characteristics, tolerance to induction therapy, morbidity, mortality, deviations from protocol, and induction outcomes among children with ALL treated at a tertiary care teaching hospital (Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttrakhand, India). Confirmed cases of ALL with age upto 18 years, who took more than a week of planned induction were included in the study. Data was analysed using Chi-square and Fisher’s-exact test. Results: Four-drug induction was feasible and given to 76 patients during the study period. Mean age of the group was 9.3 years. Male: female ratio was 1.3:1. Remission was achieved in 63 (82.8%) patients. Four deaths occurred, and were attributed to infection. Hyperglycaemia (4), CNS events (2), peripherally inserted central line related thrombosis (2) and pulmonary tuberculosis (1) were noted. Febrile neutropenia was noted in 65 cases and seven cases required ICU care; two of them succumbed in the ICU. Baseline blood parameters, subtype of disease, protocol of treatment and age did not affect the induction outcome statistically. Conclusion: Intensive induction chemotherapy has varying complications and can be employed even in resource-limited settings with acceptable results.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/16087/51295_CE[Ra1]_F(KR)_PF1(SC_SS)_PFA(SC_KM)_PN(KM).pdfacute lymphoblastic leukaemiainduction chemotherapyleukaemiasepsissupportive care
spellingShingle Tanvi Khanna
Nitika Agrawal
Kunal Das
Brahma Prakash Kalra
Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
induction chemotherapy
leukaemia
sepsis
supportive care
title Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital
title_full Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital
title_short Tolerance of ALL Induction Therapy in Children with Limited Resources: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital
title_sort tolerance of all induction therapy in children with limited resources a retrospective study from a teaching hospital
topic acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
induction chemotherapy
leukaemia
sepsis
supportive care
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/16087/51295_CE[Ra1]_F(KR)_PF1(SC_SS)_PFA(SC_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tanvikhanna toleranceofallinductiontherapyinchildrenwithlimitedresourcesaretrospectivestudyfromateachinghospital
AT nitikaagrawal toleranceofallinductiontherapyinchildrenwithlimitedresourcesaretrospectivestudyfromateachinghospital
AT kunaldas toleranceofallinductiontherapyinchildrenwithlimitedresourcesaretrospectivestudyfromateachinghospital
AT brahmaprakashkalra toleranceofallinductiontherapyinchildrenwithlimitedresourcesaretrospectivestudyfromateachinghospital