Idee i ideaty
The original view of Joseph Życiński, presented in his book The Structure of the Metascientific Revolution (1988), boils down to the observation that almost before our eyes a great revolution took place, not in science, but in the philosophy of science, that is the meta-scientific revolution. His co...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Copernicus Center Press
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/576 |
| _version_ | 1828200437246853120 |
|---|---|
| author | Michał Heller Janusz Mączka |
| author_facet | Michał Heller Janusz Mączka |
| author_sort | Michał Heller |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The original view of Joseph Życiński, presented in his book The Structure of the Metascientific Revolution (1988), boils down to the observation that almost before our eyes a great revolution took place, not in science, but in the philosophy of science, that is the meta-scientific revolution. His concept of the meta-scientific revolution grew out of his fascination with the revolution that took place in the foundations of mathematics in the first decades of the twentieth century. Whether a change in science deserves to be called a revolution is determined by whether the transformations it underwent also reached the meta-level. The set of presuppositions underlying transformations on the meta-level Życiński calls ideata. One of the aims of this article is to critically reconstruct the meaning of this term.
The action of Życiński’s book takes place mainly on meta-level, but the meta-level constantly interacts with what is happening in science itself. The book sometimes makes an impression as if it were a study of the history of science, but history of science in a specific sense – something like a “sampling” of history with numerous examples. Among the creations of human thought, it is difficult to point to an area that changes more dynamically than science itself, but looking at it from a meta-perspective allows us to grasp those of its features that operate on a much broader scale. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:14:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-035c6fb47abb4760a129b71f9b6e3f1b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0867-8286 2451-0602 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:14:08Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Center Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce |
| spelling | doaj.art-035c6fb47abb4760a129b71f9b6e3f1b2022-12-22T03:35:33ZdeuCopernicus Center PressZagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce0867-82862451-06022022-11-0172203212524Idee i ideatyMichał Heller0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-6808Janusz Mączka1Centrum Kopernika Badań InterdyscyplinarnychUniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie, Wydział Filozoficzny; Centrum Kopernika Badań InterdyscyplinarnychThe original view of Joseph Życiński, presented in his book The Structure of the Metascientific Revolution (1988), boils down to the observation that almost before our eyes a great revolution took place, not in science, but in the philosophy of science, that is the meta-scientific revolution. His concept of the meta-scientific revolution grew out of his fascination with the revolution that took place in the foundations of mathematics in the first decades of the twentieth century. Whether a change in science deserves to be called a revolution is determined by whether the transformations it underwent also reached the meta-level. The set of presuppositions underlying transformations on the meta-level Życiński calls ideata. One of the aims of this article is to critically reconstruct the meaning of this term. The action of Życiński’s book takes place mainly on meta-level, but the meta-level constantly interacts with what is happening in science itself. The book sometimes makes an impression as if it were a study of the history of science, but history of science in a specific sense – something like a “sampling” of history with numerous examples. Among the creations of human thought, it is difficult to point to an area that changes more dynamically than science itself, but looking at it from a meta-perspective allows us to grasp those of its features that operate on a much broader scale.https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/576scientific revolutionmeta-scientific revolutionideatsthemataepistemedoxa |
| spellingShingle | Michał Heller Janusz Mączka Idee i ideaty Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce scientific revolution meta-scientific revolution ideats themata episteme doxa |
| title | Idee i ideaty |
| title_full | Idee i ideaty |
| title_fullStr | Idee i ideaty |
| title_full_unstemmed | Idee i ideaty |
| title_short | Idee i ideaty |
| title_sort | idee i ideaty |
| topic | scientific revolution meta-scientific revolution ideats themata episteme doxa |
| url | https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/576 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michałheller ideeiideaty AT januszmaczka ideeiideaty |