Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?

Animals under human care interact with their caretakers, potentially resulting in human–animal bonds (HABs), which can enhance wellbeing for both. Previous research has suggested that keepers perceive bonds with their animals, but investigation of a different zoo role working with one species has no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Welsh, Sabrina Brando, Geoff Hosey, Samantha J. Ward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5636/3/3/31
_version_ 1797486000649273344
author Thomas Welsh
Sabrina Brando
Geoff Hosey
Samantha J. Ward
author_facet Thomas Welsh
Sabrina Brando
Geoff Hosey
Samantha J. Ward
author_sort Thomas Welsh
collection DOAJ
description Animals under human care interact with their caretakers, potentially resulting in human–animal bonds (HABs), which can enhance wellbeing for both. Previous research has suggested that keepers perceive bonds with their animals, but investigation of a different zoo role working with one species has not yet been completed. Here, we investigate the animal trainers’ perception of HABs with captive bottlenose dolphins (<i>Tursiops truncatus</i>). A modified Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) was used to measure the strength of perceived HABs between trainers and both dolphins and companion animals in their care. LAPS questionnaires were completed by 128 trainers from 35 different collections worldwide. Most respondents perceived themselves to have a bond with a dolphin, although LAPS scores for attachment to dolphins (DA) were significantly lower than for companion animals (CA). Female LAPS scores were significantly higher than males for both DA and CA. Multiple regression demonstrated that the facility and trainer gender were significant predictors of CA. LAPS scores for trainers were comparable to those for zoo animals, which reflects a strong attachment to the dolphins they work with. However, this attachment was not as strong as for their companion animals, and was influenced by the collection they worked for.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:26:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-035ea022478a4cf181c7d810c3b3f650
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-5636
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:26:55Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens
spelling doaj.art-035ea022478a4cf181c7d810c3b3f6502023-11-23T17:15:54ZengMDPI AGJournal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens2673-56362022-08-013340941910.3390/jzbg3030031Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?Thomas Welsh0Sabrina Brando1Geoff Hosey2Samantha J. Ward3Askham Bryan College, University Centre Askham Bryan, York YO23 3FR, UKAnimalConcepts, Teulada, 03725 Alicante, SpainBiology, University of Bolton, Bolton BL3 5AB, UKSchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UKAnimals under human care interact with their caretakers, potentially resulting in human–animal bonds (HABs), which can enhance wellbeing for both. Previous research has suggested that keepers perceive bonds with their animals, but investigation of a different zoo role working with one species has not yet been completed. Here, we investigate the animal trainers’ perception of HABs with captive bottlenose dolphins (<i>Tursiops truncatus</i>). A modified Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) was used to measure the strength of perceived HABs between trainers and both dolphins and companion animals in their care. LAPS questionnaires were completed by 128 trainers from 35 different collections worldwide. Most respondents perceived themselves to have a bond with a dolphin, although LAPS scores for attachment to dolphins (DA) were significantly lower than for companion animals (CA). Female LAPS scores were significantly higher than males for both DA and CA. Multiple regression demonstrated that the facility and trainer gender were significant predictors of CA. LAPS scores for trainers were comparable to those for zoo animals, which reflects a strong attachment to the dolphins they work with. However, this attachment was not as strong as for their companion animals, and was influenced by the collection they worked for.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5636/3/3/31human–animal relationship (HAR)dolphinzooattachmenthuman–animal bond (HAB)companion animal
spellingShingle Thomas Welsh
Sabrina Brando
Geoff Hosey
Samantha J. Ward
Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?
Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens
human–animal relationship (HAR)
dolphin
zoo
attachment
human–animal bond (HAB)
companion animal
title Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?
title_full Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?
title_fullStr Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?
title_full_unstemmed Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?
title_short Members of the Pod: Do Marine Mammal Trainers Perceive a Bond with the Animals They Care For?
title_sort members of the pod do marine mammal trainers perceive a bond with the animals they care for
topic human–animal relationship (HAR)
dolphin
zoo
attachment
human–animal bond (HAB)
companion animal
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5636/3/3/31
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaswelsh membersofthepoddomarinemammaltrainersperceiveabondwiththeanimalstheycarefor
AT sabrinabrando membersofthepoddomarinemammaltrainersperceiveabondwiththeanimalstheycarefor
AT geoffhosey membersofthepoddomarinemammaltrainersperceiveabondwiththeanimalstheycarefor
AT samanthajward membersofthepoddomarinemammaltrainersperceiveabondwiththeanimalstheycarefor