Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective

A critical discourse analysis (CDA) of English language teaching (ELT) textbooks can provide a theoretical description of existing ideological effects in the texts and a means to link linguistic and social practices. This study, thus, seeks to evaluate Summit 2B (i.e., the advanced book of Top Notch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ali roohani, najmeh heidari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2012-06-01
Series:Issues in Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_119_ecd9d18235fea325f6c3ddec0a4a426c.pdf
_version_ 1827400471622451200
author ali roohani
najmeh heidari
author_facet ali roohani
najmeh heidari
author_sort ali roohani
collection DOAJ
description A critical discourse analysis (CDA) of English language teaching (ELT) textbooks can provide a theoretical description of existing ideological effects in the texts and a means to link linguistic and social practices. This study, thus, seeks to evaluate Summit 2B (i.e., the advanced book of Top Notch series) with a focus on the representation of male and female social actors. In so doing, this study drew on van Leeuwen’s (1996) social actor framework and Halliday’s (2004) transitivity model. To achieve the purpose of this study, content analysis was first carried out in the corpora obtained from the aforementioned textbook to find out the frequency and proportion of various social actors. The results obtained from the tests of significance (i.e., chi-square tests) and the qualitative data analyses revealed that there were some significant differences between males and females concerning role allocation (i.e., activation, subjection, and beneficialization), substitution (personalization/impersonalizaton), and personal pronouns. Compared with females, males were represented as more active, energetic, independent, and assertive forces; males were represented more frequently and placed in high-status positions; they were also individualized more frequently. The results indicated that though females and males were almost equally informalized and indetermined, there was not much serious attempt to eliminate the gender bias in Summit, used as a substitute for other ELT textbooks used in private language institutes in Iran. The findings suggest that textbook writers and publishers should be more cautious about the gender discourse, along with other criteria making ELT textbooks work, because gender bias can affect language learners’ perception and preference for the choice of language in second or foreign (L2) communication.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:03:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0363bfee019943bc93d6535c4df56950
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-3715
2476-6194
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:03:40Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Issues in Language Teaching
spelling doaj.art-0363bfee019943bc93d6535c4df569502023-12-23T10:45:45ZengAllameh Tabataba'i University PressIssues in Language Teaching2322-37152476-61942012-06-0111123158119Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspectiveali roohaninajmeh heidariA critical discourse analysis (CDA) of English language teaching (ELT) textbooks can provide a theoretical description of existing ideological effects in the texts and a means to link linguistic and social practices. This study, thus, seeks to evaluate Summit 2B (i.e., the advanced book of Top Notch series) with a focus on the representation of male and female social actors. In so doing, this study drew on van Leeuwen’s (1996) social actor framework and Halliday’s (2004) transitivity model. To achieve the purpose of this study, content analysis was first carried out in the corpora obtained from the aforementioned textbook to find out the frequency and proportion of various social actors. The results obtained from the tests of significance (i.e., chi-square tests) and the qualitative data analyses revealed that there were some significant differences between males and females concerning role allocation (i.e., activation, subjection, and beneficialization), substitution (personalization/impersonalizaton), and personal pronouns. Compared with females, males were represented as more active, energetic, independent, and assertive forces; males were represented more frequently and placed in high-status positions; they were also individualized more frequently. The results indicated that though females and males were almost equally informalized and indetermined, there was not much serious attempt to eliminate the gender bias in Summit, used as a substitute for other ELT textbooks used in private language institutes in Iran. The findings suggest that textbook writers and publishers should be more cautious about the gender discourse, along with other criteria making ELT textbooks work, because gender bias can affect language learners’ perception and preference for the choice of language in second or foreign (L2) communication.https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_119_ecd9d18235fea325f6c3ddec0a4a426c.pdfcritical discourse analysisevaluationgendertextbookssocial actorssummit
spellingShingle ali roohani
najmeh heidari
Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective
Issues in Language Teaching
critical discourse analysis
evaluation
gender
textbooks
social actors
summit
title Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective
title_full Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective
title_fullStr Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective
title_short Evaluating an Instructional Textbook: A Critical Discourse Perspective
title_sort evaluating an instructional textbook a critical discourse perspective
topic critical discourse analysis
evaluation
gender
textbooks
social actors
summit
url https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_119_ecd9d18235fea325f6c3ddec0a4a426c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aliroohani evaluatinganinstructionaltextbookacriticaldiscourseperspective
AT najmehheidari evaluatinganinstructionaltextbookacriticaldiscourseperspective