Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease

Abstract Background The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in outcome that physicians or patients would consider meaningful and is relevant when evaluating disease progression or the efficacy of interventions. Studies of patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristl G. Claeys, Hani Kushlaf, Syed Raza, Noemi Hummel, Simon Shohet, Ian Keyzor, Agnieszka Kopiec, Ryan Graham, Brian Fox, Benedikt Schoser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-04-01
Series:Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03156-3
_version_ 1797209035706990592
author Kristl G. Claeys
Hani Kushlaf
Syed Raza
Noemi Hummel
Simon Shohet
Ian Keyzor
Agnieszka Kopiec
Ryan Graham
Brian Fox
Benedikt Schoser
author_facet Kristl G. Claeys
Hani Kushlaf
Syed Raza
Noemi Hummel
Simon Shohet
Ian Keyzor
Agnieszka Kopiec
Ryan Graham
Brian Fox
Benedikt Schoser
author_sort Kristl G. Claeys
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in outcome that physicians or patients would consider meaningful and is relevant when evaluating disease progression or the efficacy of interventions. Studies of patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) have used the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) as an endpoint to assess motor function. However, an MCID for 6MWD (% predicted and meters) has yet to be established in LOPD. The objective of the study was to derive 6MWD MCID (% predicted and meters) with different analysis methods and for subgroups of different disease severity for LOPD. Methods Data from the PROPEL trial were used to calculate 6MWD MCID in the overall PROPEL population and subgroups of baseline severity as assessed by walking distance and body mass index (BMI), using anchor- and distribution-based approaches. Results The 6MWD MCIDs varied widely, depending on the method and subgroup, ranging from 2.27%-8.11% predicted for the overall LOPD population (23.7 m-57.2 m). For patients with baseline 6MWD < 150 m, MCIDs ranged from -0.74%-3.37% (-2.1 m-11.3 m). MCIDs increased with distance walked at baseline until a plateau was reached. For BMI subgroups, the MCIDs were generally lowest in obese patients. Conclusion Our analysis shows that MCID depends on the chosen method and disease severity. The findings suggest that applying a single MCID to all patients can be misleading; consequently, a range of possible MCIDs should be considered. This may also be highly relevant for other neuromuscular diseases. This study provides a range of 6MWD MCIDs for LOPD, with lower MCIDs for more severe patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:48:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-038589708d914771b4227aa70fd5c9b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1750-1172
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:48:18Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
spelling doaj.art-038589708d914771b4227aa70fd5c9b82024-04-14T11:29:08ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722024-04-0119111010.1186/s13023-024-03156-3Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe diseaseKristl G. Claeys0Hani Kushlaf1Syed Raza2Noemi Hummel3Simon Shohet4Ian Keyzor5Agnieszka KopiecRyan Graham6Brian Fox7Benedikt Schoser8Department of Neurology, University Hospitals LeuvenUniversity of Cincinnati College of MedicineAmicus Therapeutics, Ltd.Certara GmbHAmicus Therapeutics, Ltd.Amicus Therapeutics, Ltd.Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversityAbstract Background The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in outcome that physicians or patients would consider meaningful and is relevant when evaluating disease progression or the efficacy of interventions. Studies of patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) have used the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) as an endpoint to assess motor function. However, an MCID for 6MWD (% predicted and meters) has yet to be established in LOPD. The objective of the study was to derive 6MWD MCID (% predicted and meters) with different analysis methods and for subgroups of different disease severity for LOPD. Methods Data from the PROPEL trial were used to calculate 6MWD MCID in the overall PROPEL population and subgroups of baseline severity as assessed by walking distance and body mass index (BMI), using anchor- and distribution-based approaches. Results The 6MWD MCIDs varied widely, depending on the method and subgroup, ranging from 2.27%-8.11% predicted for the overall LOPD population (23.7 m-57.2 m). For patients with baseline 6MWD < 150 m, MCIDs ranged from -0.74%-3.37% (-2.1 m-11.3 m). MCIDs increased with distance walked at baseline until a plateau was reached. For BMI subgroups, the MCIDs were generally lowest in obese patients. Conclusion Our analysis shows that MCID depends on the chosen method and disease severity. The findings suggest that applying a single MCID to all patients can be misleading; consequently, a range of possible MCIDs should be considered. This may also be highly relevant for other neuromuscular diseases. This study provides a range of 6MWD MCIDs for LOPD, with lower MCIDs for more severe patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03156-3Minimal clinically important differenceMCIDSix-minute walk distance6MWDLate-onset Pompe diseaseDisease severity
spellingShingle Kristl G. Claeys
Hani Kushlaf
Syed Raza
Noemi Hummel
Simon Shohet
Ian Keyzor
Agnieszka Kopiec
Ryan Graham
Brian Fox
Benedikt Schoser
Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Minimal clinically important difference
MCID
Six-minute walk distance
6MWD
Late-onset Pompe disease
Disease severity
title Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
title_full Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
title_fullStr Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
title_full_unstemmed Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
title_short Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
title_sort minimal clinically important differences in six minute walking distance in late onset pompe disease
topic Minimal clinically important difference
MCID
Six-minute walk distance
6MWD
Late-onset Pompe disease
Disease severity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03156-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kristlgclaeys minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT hanikushlaf minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT syedraza minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT noemihummel minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT simonshohet minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT iankeyzor minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT agnieszkakopiec minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT ryangraham minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT brianfox minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease
AT benediktschoser minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesinsixminutewalkingdistanceinlateonsetpompedisease