Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing

Although hexavalent chromium-based protection systems are effective and their long-term performance is well understood, they can no longer be used due to their proven Cr(VI) toxicity and carcinogenic effect. The search for alternative protection technologies for Mg alloys has been going on for at le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ewa Wierzbicka, Bahram Vaghefinazari, Marta Mohedano, Peter Visser, Ralf Posner, Carsten Blawert, Mikhail Zheludkevich, Sviatlana Lamaka, Endzhe Matykina, Raúl Arrabal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/23/8515
_version_ 1797462760983887872
author Ewa Wierzbicka
Bahram Vaghefinazari
Marta Mohedano
Peter Visser
Ralf Posner
Carsten Blawert
Mikhail Zheludkevich
Sviatlana Lamaka
Endzhe Matykina
Raúl Arrabal
author_facet Ewa Wierzbicka
Bahram Vaghefinazari
Marta Mohedano
Peter Visser
Ralf Posner
Carsten Blawert
Mikhail Zheludkevich
Sviatlana Lamaka
Endzhe Matykina
Raúl Arrabal
author_sort Ewa Wierzbicka
collection DOAJ
description Although hexavalent chromium-based protection systems are effective and their long-term performance is well understood, they can no longer be used due to their proven Cr(VI) toxicity and carcinogenic effect. The search for alternative protection technologies for Mg alloys has been going on for at least a couple of decades. However, surface treatment systems with equivalent efficacies to that of Cr(VI)-based ones have only begun to emerge much more recently. It is still proving challenging to find sufficiently protective replacements for Cr(VI) that do not give rise to safety concerns related to corrosion, especially in terms of fulfilling the requirements of the transportation industry. Additionally, in overcoming these obstacles, the advantages of newly introduced technologies have to include not only health safety but also need to be balanced against their added cost, as well as being environmentally friendly and simple to implement and maintain. Anodizing, especially when carried out above the breakdown potential (technology known as Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)) is an electrochemical oxidation process which has been recognized as one of the most effective methods to significantly improve the corrosion resistance of Mg and its alloys by forming a protective ceramic-like layer on their surface that isolates the base material from aggressive environmental agents. Part II of this review summarizes developments in and future outlooks for Mg anodizing, including traditional chromium-based processes and newly developed chromium-free alternatives, such as PEO technology and the use of organic electrolytes. This work provides an overview of processing parameters such as electrolyte composition and additives, voltage/current regimes, and post-treatment sealing strategies that influence the corrosion performance of the coatings. This large variability of the fabrication conditions makes it possible to obtain Cr-free products that meet the industrial requirements for performance, as expected from traditional Cr-based technologies.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:41:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03887f03dbc0407ca52adbe778d6ecd9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:41:14Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-03887f03dbc0407ca52adbe778d6ecd92023-11-24T11:29:32ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-11-011523851510.3390/ma15238515Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and AnodizingEwa Wierzbicka0Bahram Vaghefinazari1Marta Mohedano2Peter Visser3Ralf Posner4Carsten Blawert5Mikhail Zheludkevich6Sviatlana Lamaka7Endzhe Matykina8Raúl Arrabal9Departamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, GermanyDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainAkzoNobel, 2171 EN Sassenheim, The NetherlandsHenkel AG & Co. KGaA, 40191 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, GermanyInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, GermanyInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, GermanyDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainAlthough hexavalent chromium-based protection systems are effective and their long-term performance is well understood, they can no longer be used due to their proven Cr(VI) toxicity and carcinogenic effect. The search for alternative protection technologies for Mg alloys has been going on for at least a couple of decades. However, surface treatment systems with equivalent efficacies to that of Cr(VI)-based ones have only begun to emerge much more recently. It is still proving challenging to find sufficiently protective replacements for Cr(VI) that do not give rise to safety concerns related to corrosion, especially in terms of fulfilling the requirements of the transportation industry. Additionally, in overcoming these obstacles, the advantages of newly introduced technologies have to include not only health safety but also need to be balanced against their added cost, as well as being environmentally friendly and simple to implement and maintain. Anodizing, especially when carried out above the breakdown potential (technology known as Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)) is an electrochemical oxidation process which has been recognized as one of the most effective methods to significantly improve the corrosion resistance of Mg and its alloys by forming a protective ceramic-like layer on their surface that isolates the base material from aggressive environmental agents. Part II of this review summarizes developments in and future outlooks for Mg anodizing, including traditional chromium-based processes and newly developed chromium-free alternatives, such as PEO technology and the use of organic electrolytes. This work provides an overview of processing parameters such as electrolyte composition and additives, voltage/current regimes, and post-treatment sealing strategies that influence the corrosion performance of the coatings. This large variability of the fabrication conditions makes it possible to obtain Cr-free products that meet the industrial requirements for performance, as expected from traditional Cr-based technologies.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/23/8515magnesiumcoatingmicro-arc oxidation (MAO)Cr(VI)-based coatings
spellingShingle Ewa Wierzbicka
Bahram Vaghefinazari
Marta Mohedano
Peter Visser
Ralf Posner
Carsten Blawert
Mikhail Zheludkevich
Sviatlana Lamaka
Endzhe Matykina
Raúl Arrabal
Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing
Materials
magnesium
coating
micro-arc oxidation (MAO)
Cr(VI)-based coatings
title Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing
title_full Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing
title_fullStr Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing
title_full_unstemmed Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing
title_short Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys—A Review: Part II—PEO and Anodizing
title_sort chromate free corrosion protection strategies for magnesium alloys a review part ii peo and anodizing
topic magnesium
coating
micro-arc oxidation (MAO)
Cr(VI)-based coatings
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/23/8515
work_keys_str_mv AT ewawierzbicka chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT bahramvaghefinazari chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT martamohedano chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT petervisser chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT ralfposner chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT carstenblawert chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT mikhailzheludkevich chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT sviatlanalamaka chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT endzhematykina chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing
AT raularrabal chromatefreecorrosionprotectionstrategiesformagnesiumalloysareviewpartiipeoandanodizing