Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status

Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes gain importance for the assessment of auditory abilities in cochlear implant users and for the evaluation of auditory rehabilitation. Aims of the study were to explore the interrelation of self-reported improvements in auditory ability with improvements in speec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke, Tobias Balkenhol, Svetlana Hetjens, Nicole Rotter, Jerome J. Servais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2018.00753/full
_version_ 1818202865162780672
author Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke
Tobias Balkenhol
Svetlana Hetjens
Nicole Rotter
Jerome J. Servais
author_facet Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke
Tobias Balkenhol
Svetlana Hetjens
Nicole Rotter
Jerome J. Servais
author_sort Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes gain importance for the assessment of auditory abilities in cochlear implant users and for the evaluation of auditory rehabilitation. Aims of the study were to explore the interrelation of self-reported improvements in auditory ability with improvements in speech comprehension and to identify factors other than audiological improvement that affect self-reported auditory ability.Study Design: Explorative prospective analysis using a within-subjects repeated measures design.Setting: Academic tertiary care center.Participants: Twenty-seven adult participants with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who received a HiRes 90K CI and continued use of a HA at the non-implanted ear (bimodal hearing).Intervention: Cochlear implantation.Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported auditory ability/disability assessed by the comparative version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B), and monosyllable as well as sentence comprehension in quiet and within speech modulated noise from different directions assessed pre- as well as 3 and 6 months post-implantation.Results: Data of 17 individuals were analyzed. At the endpoint of the study, improvement of self-reported auditory ability was significant. Regarding audiometric measures, significant improvement was seen for CI-aided pure tone thresholds, for monaural CI-assisted and bimodal sentence comprehension in quiet and in speech-modulated noise that was presented from the same source or at the side of the HA-ear. Correlations between self-reported and audiometric improvements remained weak, with the exception of the improvement seen for monaural CI-aided sentence comprehension in quiet and self-perceived improvement of sound quality. Considerable correlations existed between self-reported improvements and current level of depression and anxiety, and with general self-efficaciousness. Regression analyses substantiated a positive influence of self-efficaciousness on self-reported improvement in speech comprehension and between the improvement of monaural CI-aided sentence comprehension in quiet and perceived sound quality as well as a negative influence of anxiety on self-reported improvement in spatial hearing. Self-reported improvements were significantly better in the subgroup with intensive as compared to regular rehabilitation.Conclusions: Self-reported auditory ability/disability represents an important measure for the success of bimodal CI-provision. It is influenced by personal and mental health factors that may improve CI-rehabilitation results if addressed during rehabilitation.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:16:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-038e834b57c44869be194cb85ce72aef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:16:14Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-038e834b57c44869be194cb85ce72aef2022-12-22T00:40:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952018-09-01910.3389/fneur.2018.00753405846Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing StatusElisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke0Tobias Balkenhol1Svetlana Hetjens2Nicole Rotter3Jerome J. Servais4Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyInstitute of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyObjectives: Patient-reported outcomes gain importance for the assessment of auditory abilities in cochlear implant users and for the evaluation of auditory rehabilitation. Aims of the study were to explore the interrelation of self-reported improvements in auditory ability with improvements in speech comprehension and to identify factors other than audiological improvement that affect self-reported auditory ability.Study Design: Explorative prospective analysis using a within-subjects repeated measures design.Setting: Academic tertiary care center.Participants: Twenty-seven adult participants with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who received a HiRes 90K CI and continued use of a HA at the non-implanted ear (bimodal hearing).Intervention: Cochlear implantation.Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported auditory ability/disability assessed by the comparative version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B), and monosyllable as well as sentence comprehension in quiet and within speech modulated noise from different directions assessed pre- as well as 3 and 6 months post-implantation.Results: Data of 17 individuals were analyzed. At the endpoint of the study, improvement of self-reported auditory ability was significant. Regarding audiometric measures, significant improvement was seen for CI-aided pure tone thresholds, for monaural CI-assisted and bimodal sentence comprehension in quiet and in speech-modulated noise that was presented from the same source or at the side of the HA-ear. Correlations between self-reported and audiometric improvements remained weak, with the exception of the improvement seen for monaural CI-aided sentence comprehension in quiet and self-perceived improvement of sound quality. Considerable correlations existed between self-reported improvements and current level of depression and anxiety, and with general self-efficaciousness. Regression analyses substantiated a positive influence of self-efficaciousness on self-reported improvement in speech comprehension and between the improvement of monaural CI-aided sentence comprehension in quiet and perceived sound quality as well as a negative influence of anxiety on self-reported improvement in spatial hearing. Self-reported improvements were significantly better in the subgroup with intensive as compared to regular rehabilitation.Conclusions: Self-reported auditory ability/disability represents an important measure for the success of bimodal CI-provision. It is influenced by personal and mental health factors that may improve CI-rehabilitation results if addressed during rehabilitation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2018.00753/fullcochlear implanthearing aidbimodal hearingSSQspeech audiometryanxiety
spellingShingle Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke
Tobias Balkenhol
Svetlana Hetjens
Nicole Rotter
Jerome J. Servais
Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status
Frontiers in Neurology
cochlear implant
hearing aid
bimodal hearing
SSQ
speech audiometry
anxiety
title Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status
title_full Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status
title_fullStr Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status
title_full_unstemmed Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status
title_short Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status
title_sort patient benefit following bimodal ci provision self reported abilities vs hearing status
topic cochlear implant
hearing aid
bimodal hearing
SSQ
speech audiometry
anxiety
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2018.00753/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethwallhausserfranke patientbenefitfollowingbimodalciprovisionselfreportedabilitiesvshearingstatus
AT tobiasbalkenhol patientbenefitfollowingbimodalciprovisionselfreportedabilitiesvshearingstatus
AT svetlanahetjens patientbenefitfollowingbimodalciprovisionselfreportedabilitiesvshearingstatus
AT nicolerotter patientbenefitfollowingbimodalciprovisionselfreportedabilitiesvshearingstatus
AT jeromejservais patientbenefitfollowingbimodalciprovisionselfreportedabilitiesvshearingstatus