The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Many infants do not receive breastmilk for the recommended 2-year duration. Instead, alternative milk beverages are often used, including infant formula and raw animal milk products. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of animal milk consumption, compared to infant form...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie M. Ehrlich, Joseph Catania, Muizz Zaman, Emily Tanner Smith, Abigail Smith, Olivia Tsistinas, Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta, Aamer Imdad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/3/488
_version_ 1797485596312076288
author Julie M. Ehrlich
Joseph Catania
Muizz Zaman
Emily Tanner Smith
Abigail Smith
Olivia Tsistinas
Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Aamer Imdad
author_facet Julie M. Ehrlich
Joseph Catania
Muizz Zaman
Emily Tanner Smith
Abigail Smith
Olivia Tsistinas
Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Aamer Imdad
author_sort Julie M. Ehrlich
collection DOAJ
description Many infants do not receive breastmilk for the recommended 2-year duration. Instead, alternative milk beverages are often used, including infant formula and raw animal milk products. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of animal milk consumption, compared to infant formula, on health outcomes in non-breastfed or mixed-fed infants aged 6–11 months. We searched multiple databases and followed Cochrane guidelines for conducting the review. The primary outcomes were anemia, gastrointestinal blood loss, weight-for-age, length-for-age, and weight-for-length. Nine studies were included: four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and five cohort studies. All studies, except one, were conducted in high income countries. There was a low certainty of evidence that cow’s milk increased the risk of anemia compared to formula milk (Cohort studies RR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.15, 4.43, RCTs: RR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.68, 9.65) and gastrointestinal blood loss (Cohort study RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.73, 3.16, RCTs: RR: 3.14, 95% CI: 0.98, 10.04). Additionally, there was low certainty evidence that animal milk consumption may not have a differential effect on weight and length-for-age compared to formula milk. Overall, the evidence was of low certainty and no solid conclusions can be drawn from this data. Further studies are needed from low- and middle-income countries to assess optimal milk type in non-breastfed infants aged 6–11 months.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:22:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0399a315d8354d16859b6f9de76038ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:22:03Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-0399a315d8354d16859b6f9de76038ca2023-11-23T17:24:36ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432022-01-0114348810.3390/nu14030488The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJulie M. Ehrlich0Joseph Catania1Muizz Zaman2Emily Tanner Smith3Abigail Smith4Olivia Tsistinas5Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta6Aamer Imdad7College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USACollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USACollege of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USACollege of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USAHealth Science Library, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USAHealth Science Library, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USACentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, CanadaDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USAMany infants do not receive breastmilk for the recommended 2-year duration. Instead, alternative milk beverages are often used, including infant formula and raw animal milk products. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of animal milk consumption, compared to infant formula, on health outcomes in non-breastfed or mixed-fed infants aged 6–11 months. We searched multiple databases and followed Cochrane guidelines for conducting the review. The primary outcomes were anemia, gastrointestinal blood loss, weight-for-age, length-for-age, and weight-for-length. Nine studies were included: four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and five cohort studies. All studies, except one, were conducted in high income countries. There was a low certainty of evidence that cow’s milk increased the risk of anemia compared to formula milk (Cohort studies RR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.15, 4.43, RCTs: RR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.68, 9.65) and gastrointestinal blood loss (Cohort study RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.73, 3.16, RCTs: RR: 3.14, 95% CI: 0.98, 10.04). Additionally, there was low certainty evidence that animal milk consumption may not have a differential effect on weight and length-for-age compared to formula milk. Overall, the evidence was of low certainty and no solid conclusions can be drawn from this data. Further studies are needed from low- and middle-income countries to assess optimal milk type in non-breastfed infants aged 6–11 months.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/3/488animal’s milkinfant formulaanemiacow’s milk
spellingShingle Julie M. Ehrlich
Joseph Catania
Muizz Zaman
Emily Tanner Smith
Abigail Smith
Olivia Tsistinas
Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Aamer Imdad
The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients
animal’s milk
infant formula
anemia
cow’s milk
title The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Effect of Consumption of Animal Milk Compared to Infant Formula for Non-Breastfed/Mixed-Fed Infants 6–11 Months of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of consumption of animal milk compared to infant formula for non breastfed mixed fed infants 6 11 months of age a systematic review and meta analysis
topic animal’s milk
infant formula
anemia
cow’s milk
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/3/488
work_keys_str_mv AT juliemehrlich theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT josephcatania theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT muizzzaman theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT emilytannersmith theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abigailsmith theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oliviatsistinas theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zulfiqarahmedbhutta theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aamerimdad theeffectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT juliemehrlich effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT josephcatania effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT muizzzaman effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT emilytannersmith effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abigailsmith effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oliviatsistinas effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zulfiqarahmedbhutta effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aamerimdad effectofconsumptionofanimalmilkcomparedtoinfantformulafornonbreastfedmixedfedinfants611monthsofageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis