The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the ear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sera-Melisa Thomas, Maya M Jeyaraman, William G Hodge, Cindy Hutnik, John Costella, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4257598?pdf=render
_version_ 1818286517435498496
author Sera-Melisa Thomas
Maya M Jeyaraman
William G Hodge
Cindy Hutnik
John Costella
Monali S Malvankar-Mehta
author_facet Sera-Melisa Thomas
Maya M Jeyaraman
William G Hodge
Cindy Hutnik
John Costella
Monali S Malvankar-Mehta
author_sort Sera-Melisa Thomas
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the earlier stages to prevent disease progression and vision loss. Teleglaucoma uses stereoscopic digital imaging to take ocular images, which are transmitted electronically to an ocular specialist. The purpose is to synthesize literature to evaluate teleglaucoma, its diagnostic accuracy, healthcare system benefits, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to help locate published and unpublished studies. Studies which evaluate teleglaucoma as a screening device for glaucoma were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and the relative percentage of glaucoma cases detected. The improvements to healthcare service quality and cost data were assessed. RESULTS: Of 11237 studies reviewed, 45 were included. Our results indicated that, teleglaucoma is more specific and less sensitive than in-person examination. The pooled estimates of sensitivity was 0.832 [95% CI 0.770, 0.881] and specificity was 0.790 [95% CI 0.668, 0.876]. The relative odds of a positive screen test in glaucoma cases are 18.7 times more likely than a negative screen test in a non-glaucoma cases. Additionally, the mean cost for every case of glaucoma detected was $1098.67 US and of teleglaucoma per patient screened was $922.77 US. CONCLUSION: Teleglaucoma can accurately discriminate between screen test results with greater odds for positive cases. It detects more cases of glaucoma than in-person examination. Both patients and the healthcare systems benefit from early detection, reduction in wait and travel times, increased specialist referral rates, and cost savings. Teleglaucoma is an effective screening tool for glaucoma specifically for remote and under-services communities.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:25:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03a7d583a1414984b4d698ed26b45f78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:25:51Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-03a7d583a1414984b4d698ed26b45f782022-12-22T00:04:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11377910.1371/journal.pone.0113779The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sera-Melisa ThomasMaya M JeyaramanWilliam G HodgeCindy HutnikJohn CostellaMonali S Malvankar-MehtaBACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the earlier stages to prevent disease progression and vision loss. Teleglaucoma uses stereoscopic digital imaging to take ocular images, which are transmitted electronically to an ocular specialist. The purpose is to synthesize literature to evaluate teleglaucoma, its diagnostic accuracy, healthcare system benefits, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to help locate published and unpublished studies. Studies which evaluate teleglaucoma as a screening device for glaucoma were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and the relative percentage of glaucoma cases detected. The improvements to healthcare service quality and cost data were assessed. RESULTS: Of 11237 studies reviewed, 45 were included. Our results indicated that, teleglaucoma is more specific and less sensitive than in-person examination. The pooled estimates of sensitivity was 0.832 [95% CI 0.770, 0.881] and specificity was 0.790 [95% CI 0.668, 0.876]. The relative odds of a positive screen test in glaucoma cases are 18.7 times more likely than a negative screen test in a non-glaucoma cases. Additionally, the mean cost for every case of glaucoma detected was $1098.67 US and of teleglaucoma per patient screened was $922.77 US. CONCLUSION: Teleglaucoma can accurately discriminate between screen test results with greater odds for positive cases. It detects more cases of glaucoma than in-person examination. Both patients and the healthcare systems benefit from early detection, reduction in wait and travel times, increased specialist referral rates, and cost savings. Teleglaucoma is an effective screening tool for glaucoma specifically for remote and under-services communities.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4257598?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sera-Melisa Thomas
Maya M Jeyaraman
William G Hodge
Cindy Hutnik
John Costella
Monali S Malvankar-Mehta
The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in patient examination for glaucoma screening a systematic review and meta analysis
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4257598?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT seramelisathomas theeffectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mayamjeyaraman theeffectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamghodge theeffectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cindyhutnik theeffectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johncostella theeffectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT monalismalvankarmehta theeffectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT seramelisathomas effectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mayamjeyaraman effectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamghodge effectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cindyhutnik effectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johncostella effectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT monalismalvankarmehta effectivenessofteleglaucomaversusinpatientexaminationforglaucomascreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis