Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment

Study DesignIt is a multicenter, controlled case study review of a big scale of pedicle-screw procedures from January 2000 to June 2010. The outcomes were compared to those with no implant failure.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to review retrospectively the outcome of 100 patients with implant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed M Mohi Eldin, Abdel Mohsen Arafa Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2014-06-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-281.pdf
_version_ 1818325411933716480
author Mohamed M Mohi Eldin
Abdel Mohsen Arafa Ali
author_facet Mohamed M Mohi Eldin
Abdel Mohsen Arafa Ali
author_sort Mohamed M Mohi Eldin
collection DOAJ
description Study DesignIt is a multicenter, controlled case study review of a big scale of pedicle-screw procedures from January 2000 to June 2010. The outcomes were compared to those with no implant failure.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to review retrospectively the outcome of 100 patients with implant failure in comparison to 100 control-patients, and to study the causes of failure and its prevention.Overview of LiteratureTranspedicular fixation is associated with risks of hardware failure, such as screw/rod breakage and/or loosening at the screw-rod interface and difficulties in the system assembly, which remain a significant clinical problem. Removal or revision of the spinal hardware is often required.MethodsTwo hundred patients (88 women, 112 men) were divided into 2 major groups, with 100 patients in group I (implant failure group G1) and 100 patients in group II (successful fusion, control group G2). We subdivided the study groups into two subgroups: subgroup a (single-level instrumented group) and subgroup b (multilevel instrumented group). The implant status was assessed based on intraoperative and follow-up radiographs.ResultsImplant failure in general was present in 36% in G1a, and in 64% in G1b, and types of implant failure included screw fracture (34%), rod fracture (24%), rod loosening (22%), screw loosening (16%), and failure of both rod and screw (4%). Most of the failures (90%) occurred within 6 months after surgery, with no reported cases 1 year postoperatively.ConclusionsWe tried to address the problem and study the causes of failure, and proposed solutions for its prevention.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:44:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03a84060d91f4fb4a2abd86e2017f75c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:44:04Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-03a84060d91f4fb4a2abd86e2017f75c2022-12-21T23:47:34ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462014-06-018328129710.4184/asj.2014.8.3.281620Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological AssessmentMohamed M Mohi Eldin0Abdel Mohsen Arafa Ali1Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.Study DesignIt is a multicenter, controlled case study review of a big scale of pedicle-screw procedures from January 2000 to June 2010. The outcomes were compared to those with no implant failure.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to review retrospectively the outcome of 100 patients with implant failure in comparison to 100 control-patients, and to study the causes of failure and its prevention.Overview of LiteratureTranspedicular fixation is associated with risks of hardware failure, such as screw/rod breakage and/or loosening at the screw-rod interface and difficulties in the system assembly, which remain a significant clinical problem. Removal or revision of the spinal hardware is often required.MethodsTwo hundred patients (88 women, 112 men) were divided into 2 major groups, with 100 patients in group I (implant failure group G1) and 100 patients in group II (successful fusion, control group G2). We subdivided the study groups into two subgroups: subgroup a (single-level instrumented group) and subgroup b (multilevel instrumented group). The implant status was assessed based on intraoperative and follow-up radiographs.ResultsImplant failure in general was present in 36% in G1a, and in 64% in G1b, and types of implant failure included screw fracture (34%), rod fracture (24%), rod loosening (22%), screw loosening (16%), and failure of both rod and screw (4%). Most of the failures (90%) occurred within 6 months after surgery, with no reported cases 1 year postoperatively.ConclusionsWe tried to address the problem and study the causes of failure, and proposed solutions for its prevention.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-281.pdfLumbar, fixationScrew, failureFusionFracture fixations, prosthesisLoosening
spellingShingle Mohamed M Mohi Eldin
Abdel Mohsen Arafa Ali
Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment
Asian Spine Journal
Lumbar, fixation
Screw, failure
Fusion
Fracture fixations, prosthesis
Loosening
title Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment
title_full Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment
title_fullStr Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment
title_short Lumbar Transpedicular Implant Failure: A Clinical and Surgical Challenge and Its Radiological Assessment
title_sort lumbar transpedicular implant failure a clinical and surgical challenge and its radiological assessment
topic Lumbar, fixation
Screw, failure
Fusion
Fracture fixations, prosthesis
Loosening
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-281.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedmmohieldin lumbartranspedicularimplantfailureaclinicalandsurgicalchallengeanditsradiologicalassessment
AT abdelmohsenarafaali lumbartranspedicularimplantfailureaclinicalandsurgicalchallengeanditsradiologicalassessment