The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow

Abstract Objective The objective of this study is to assess the impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department (ED) crowding and patient flow in a Dutch level 1 trauma center. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we compare ED crowding and patient flow between a 9-month pre-interventi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. C. (Christien) van der Linden, H. M. E. (Jet) van Ufford, Project Group Medical Specialists, N. (Naomi) van der Linden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12245-019-0238-7
_version_ 1818341442627567616
author M. C. (Christien) van der Linden
H. M. E. (Jet) van Ufford
Project Group Medical Specialists
N. (Naomi) van der Linden
author_facet M. C. (Christien) van der Linden
H. M. E. (Jet) van Ufford
Project Group Medical Specialists
N. (Naomi) van der Linden
author_sort M. C. (Christien) van der Linden
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The objective of this study is to assess the impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department (ED) crowding and patient flow in a Dutch level 1 trauma center. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we compare ED crowding and patient flow between a 9-month pre-intervention period and a 9-month intervention period, during peak hours and overall (24/7). The multimodal intervention included (1) adding an emergency nurse practitioner (ENP) and (2) five medical specialists during peak hours to the 24/7 available emergency physicians (EPs), (3) a Lean programme to improve radiology turnaround times, and (4) extending the admission offices’ openings hours. Crowding is measured with the modified National ED OverCrowding Score (mNEDOCS). Furthermore, radiology turnaround times, patients’ length of stay (LOS), proportion of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS) by a medical provider, and unscheduled representations are assessed. Results The number of ED visits were grossly similar in the two periods during peak hours (15,558 ED visits in the pre-intervention period and 15,550 in the intervention period) and overall (31,891 ED visits in the pre-intervention period vs. 32,121 in the intervention period). During peak hours, ED crowding fell from 18.6% (pre-intervention period) to 3.5% (intervention period), radiology turnaround times decreased from an average of 91 min (interquartile range 45–256 min) to 50 min (IQR 30–106 min., p < 0.001) and LOS reduced with 13 min per patient from 167 to 154 min (p < 0.001). For surgery, neurology and cardiology patients, LOS reduced significantly (with 17 min, 25 min, and 8 min. respectively), while not changing for internal medicine patients. Overall, crowding, radiology turnaround times and LOS also decreased. Less patients LWBS in the intervention period (270 patients vs. 348 patients, p < 0.001) and less patients represented unscheduled within 1 week after the initial ED visit: 864 (2.7%) in the pre-intervention period vs. 645 (2.0%) patients in the intervention period, p < 0.001. Conclusions In this hospital, a multimodal intervention successfully reduces crowding, radiology turnaround times, patients’ LOS, number of patients LWBS and the number of unscheduled return visits, suggesting improved ED processes. Further research is required on total costs of care and long-term effects.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:58:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03b4950994a04567a9d32d1f9217a610
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1865-1372
1865-1380
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:58:52Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-03b4950994a04567a9d32d1f9217a6102022-12-21T23:39:13ZengBMCInternational Journal of Emergency Medicine1865-13721865-13802019-08-0112111110.1186/s12245-019-0238-7The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flowM. C. (Christien) van der Linden0H. M. E. (Jet) van Ufford1Project Group Medical Specialists2N. (Naomi) van der Linden3Haaglanden Medical Center (HMC)HMCProject Group Medical Specialists, HMCErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University RotterdamAbstract Objective The objective of this study is to assess the impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department (ED) crowding and patient flow in a Dutch level 1 trauma center. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we compare ED crowding and patient flow between a 9-month pre-intervention period and a 9-month intervention period, during peak hours and overall (24/7). The multimodal intervention included (1) adding an emergency nurse practitioner (ENP) and (2) five medical specialists during peak hours to the 24/7 available emergency physicians (EPs), (3) a Lean programme to improve radiology turnaround times, and (4) extending the admission offices’ openings hours. Crowding is measured with the modified National ED OverCrowding Score (mNEDOCS). Furthermore, radiology turnaround times, patients’ length of stay (LOS), proportion of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS) by a medical provider, and unscheduled representations are assessed. Results The number of ED visits were grossly similar in the two periods during peak hours (15,558 ED visits in the pre-intervention period and 15,550 in the intervention period) and overall (31,891 ED visits in the pre-intervention period vs. 32,121 in the intervention period). During peak hours, ED crowding fell from 18.6% (pre-intervention period) to 3.5% (intervention period), radiology turnaround times decreased from an average of 91 min (interquartile range 45–256 min) to 50 min (IQR 30–106 min., p < 0.001) and LOS reduced with 13 min per patient from 167 to 154 min (p < 0.001). For surgery, neurology and cardiology patients, LOS reduced significantly (with 17 min, 25 min, and 8 min. respectively), while not changing for internal medicine patients. Overall, crowding, radiology turnaround times and LOS also decreased. Less patients LWBS in the intervention period (270 patients vs. 348 patients, p < 0.001) and less patients represented unscheduled within 1 week after the initial ED visit: 864 (2.7%) in the pre-intervention period vs. 645 (2.0%) patients in the intervention period, p < 0.001. Conclusions In this hospital, a multimodal intervention successfully reduces crowding, radiology turnaround times, patients’ LOS, number of patients LWBS and the number of unscheduled return visits, suggesting improved ED processes. Further research is required on total costs of care and long-term effects.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12245-019-0238-7CrowdingEmergency departmentStaffingNurse practitionerPatient flowQuality of healthcare
spellingShingle M. C. (Christien) van der Linden
H. M. E. (Jet) van Ufford
Project Group Medical Specialists
N. (Naomi) van der Linden
The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Crowding
Emergency department
Staffing
Nurse practitioner
Patient flow
Quality of healthcare
title The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
title_full The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
title_fullStr The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
title_short The impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
title_sort impact of a multimodal intervention on emergency department crowding and patient flow
topic Crowding
Emergency department
Staffing
Nurse practitioner
Patient flow
Quality of healthcare
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12245-019-0238-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mcchristienvanderlinden theimpactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT hmejetvanufford theimpactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT projectgroupmedicalspecialists theimpactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT nnaomivanderlinden theimpactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT mcchristienvanderlinden impactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT hmejetvanufford impactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT projectgroupmedicalspecialists impactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow
AT nnaomivanderlinden impactofamultimodalinterventiononemergencydepartmentcrowdingandpatientflow