Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference

Synaptic plasticity is often explored as a form of unsupervised adaptationin cortical microcircuits to learn the structure of complex sensoryinputs and thereby improve performance of classification and prediction. The question of whether the specific structure of the input patterns is encoded in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph eChrol-Cannon, Yaochu eJin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2015.00103/full
_version_ 1811284037266833408
author Joseph eChrol-Cannon
Yaochu eJin
author_facet Joseph eChrol-Cannon
Yaochu eJin
author_sort Joseph eChrol-Cannon
collection DOAJ
description Synaptic plasticity is often explored as a form of unsupervised adaptationin cortical microcircuits to learn the structure of complex sensoryinputs and thereby improve performance of classification and prediction. The question of whether the specific structure of the input patterns is encoded in the structure of neural networks has been largely neglected. Existing studies that have analyzed input-specific structural adaptation have used simplified, synthetic inputs in contrast to complex and noisy patterns found in real-world sensory data.In this work, input-specific structural changes are analyzed forthree empirically derived models of plasticity applied to three temporal sensory classification tasks that include complex, real-world visual and auditory data. Two forms of spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) and the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) plasticity rule are used to adapt the recurrent network structure during the training process before performance is tested on the pattern recognition tasks.It is shown that synaptic adaptation is highly sensitive to specific classes of input pattern. However, plasticity does not improve the performance on sensory pattern recognition tasks, partly due to synaptic interference between consecutively presented input samples. The changes in synaptic strength produced by one stimulus are reversed by thepresentation of another, thus largely preventing input-specific synaptic changes from being retained in the structure of the network.To solve the problem of interference, we suggest that models of plasticitybe extended to restrict neural activity and synaptic modification to a subset of the neural circuit, which is increasingly found to be the casein experimental neuroscience.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:22:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03b65a77fd614d1fba5a63d810d0789d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5188
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:22:36Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-03b65a77fd614d1fba5a63d810d0789d2022-12-22T03:06:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882015-08-01910.3389/fncom.2015.00103135761Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to InterferenceJoseph eChrol-Cannon0Yaochu eJin1University of SurreyUniversity of SurreySynaptic plasticity is often explored as a form of unsupervised adaptationin cortical microcircuits to learn the structure of complex sensoryinputs and thereby improve performance of classification and prediction. The question of whether the specific structure of the input patterns is encoded in the structure of neural networks has been largely neglected. Existing studies that have analyzed input-specific structural adaptation have used simplified, synthetic inputs in contrast to complex and noisy patterns found in real-world sensory data.In this work, input-specific structural changes are analyzed forthree empirically derived models of plasticity applied to three temporal sensory classification tasks that include complex, real-world visual and auditory data. Two forms of spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) and the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) plasticity rule are used to adapt the recurrent network structure during the training process before performance is tested on the pattern recognition tasks.It is shown that synaptic adaptation is highly sensitive to specific classes of input pattern. However, plasticity does not improve the performance on sensory pattern recognition tasks, partly due to synaptic interference between consecutively presented input samples. The changes in synaptic strength produced by one stimulus are reversed by thepresentation of another, thus largely preventing input-specific synaptic changes from being retained in the structure of the network.To solve the problem of interference, we suggest that models of plasticitybe extended to restrict neural activity and synaptic modification to a subset of the neural circuit, which is increasingly found to be the casein experimental neuroscience.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2015.00103/fullinterferencerecurrent neural networkssynaptic plastictySpatio-temporal patternsspiking neural networks
spellingShingle Joseph eChrol-Cannon
Yaochu eJin
Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
interference
recurrent neural networks
synaptic plasticty
Spatio-temporal patterns
spiking neural networks
title Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference
title_full Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference
title_fullStr Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference
title_full_unstemmed Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference
title_short Learning Structure of Sensory Inputs with Synaptic Plasticity Leads to Interference
title_sort learning structure of sensory inputs with synaptic plasticity leads to interference
topic interference
recurrent neural networks
synaptic plasticty
Spatio-temporal patterns
spiking neural networks
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2015.00103/full
work_keys_str_mv AT josephechrolcannon learningstructureofsensoryinputswithsynapticplasticityleadstointerference
AT yaochuejin learningstructureofsensoryinputswithsynapticplasticityleadstointerference