Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography

Cardiac stroke volume (SV) is an essential hemodynamic indicator that can be used to assess whether the pump function of the heart is normal. Non-invasive SV measurement is currently performed using the impedance cardiography (ICG). In this technology, left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is an imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shing-Hong Liu, Jia-Jung Wang, Chun-Hung Su, Da-Chuan Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/9/3036
_version_ 1817990372783030272
author Shing-Hong Liu
Jia-Jung Wang
Chun-Hung Su
Da-Chuan Cheng
author_facet Shing-Hong Liu
Jia-Jung Wang
Chun-Hung Su
Da-Chuan Cheng
author_sort Shing-Hong Liu
collection DOAJ
description Cardiac stroke volume (SV) is an essential hemodynamic indicator that can be used to assess whether the pump function of the heart is normal. Non-invasive SV measurement is currently performed using the impedance cardiography (ICG). In this technology, left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is an important parameter which can be determined from the ICG signals. However, the ICG signals are inherently susceptible to artificial noise interference, which leads to an inaccurate LVET measurement and then yields an error in the calculation of SV. Therefore, the goal of the study was to measure LVETs using both the transmission and reflection photoplethysmography (PPG), and to assess whether the measured LVET was more accurate by the PPG signal than the ICG signal. The LVET measured by the phonocardiography (PCG) was used as the standard for comparing with those by the ICG and PPG. The study recruited ten subjects whose LVETs were simultaneously measured by the ICG using four electrodes, the reflection PPG using neck sensors (PPGneck) and the transmission PPG using finger sensors (PPGfinger). In each subject, ten LVETs were obtained from ten heartbeats selected properly from one-minute recording. The differences of the measured LVETs between the PCG and one of the ICG, PPGneck and PPGfinger were −68.2 ± 148.6 ms, 4.8 ± 86.5 ms and −7.0 ± 107.5 ms, respectively. As compared with the PCG, both the ICG and PPGfinger underestimated but the PPGneck overestimated the LVETs. Furthermore, the measured LVET by the PPGneck was the closest to that by the PCG. Therefore, the PPGneck may be employed to improve the LVET measurement in applying the ICG for continuous monitoring of SV in clinical settings.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:57:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03c10fb8ba2e48bc9be399ff14693e2e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:57:57Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-03c10fb8ba2e48bc9be399ff14693e2e2022-12-22T02:21:30ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202018-09-01189303610.3390/s18093036s18093036Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection PhotoplethysmographyShing-Hong Liu0Jia-Jung Wang1Chun-Hung Su2Da-Chuan Cheng3Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, TaiwanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 824, TaiwanInstitute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, TaiwanDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung 404, TaiwanCardiac stroke volume (SV) is an essential hemodynamic indicator that can be used to assess whether the pump function of the heart is normal. Non-invasive SV measurement is currently performed using the impedance cardiography (ICG). In this technology, left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is an important parameter which can be determined from the ICG signals. However, the ICG signals are inherently susceptible to artificial noise interference, which leads to an inaccurate LVET measurement and then yields an error in the calculation of SV. Therefore, the goal of the study was to measure LVETs using both the transmission and reflection photoplethysmography (PPG), and to assess whether the measured LVET was more accurate by the PPG signal than the ICG signal. The LVET measured by the phonocardiography (PCG) was used as the standard for comparing with those by the ICG and PPG. The study recruited ten subjects whose LVETs were simultaneously measured by the ICG using four electrodes, the reflection PPG using neck sensors (PPGneck) and the transmission PPG using finger sensors (PPGfinger). In each subject, ten LVETs were obtained from ten heartbeats selected properly from one-minute recording. The differences of the measured LVETs between the PCG and one of the ICG, PPGneck and PPGfinger were −68.2 ± 148.6 ms, 4.8 ± 86.5 ms and −7.0 ± 107.5 ms, respectively. As compared with the PCG, both the ICG and PPGfinger underestimated but the PPGneck overestimated the LVETs. Furthermore, the measured LVET by the PPGneck was the closest to that by the PCG. Therefore, the PPGneck may be employed to improve the LVET measurement in applying the ICG for continuous monitoring of SV in clinical settings.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/9/3036stroke volumeleft ventricular ejection timeimpedance cardiographyphotoplethysmography
spellingShingle Shing-Hong Liu
Jia-Jung Wang
Chun-Hung Su
Da-Chuan Cheng
Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography
Sensors
stroke volume
left ventricular ejection time
impedance cardiography
photoplethysmography
title Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography
title_full Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography
title_fullStr Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography
title_short Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measurement in the Impedance Cardiography Combined with the Reflection Photoplethysmography
title_sort improvement of left ventricular ejection time measurement in the impedance cardiography combined with the reflection photoplethysmography
topic stroke volume
left ventricular ejection time
impedance cardiography
photoplethysmography
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/9/3036
work_keys_str_mv AT shinghongliu improvementofleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementintheimpedancecardiographycombinedwiththereflectionphotoplethysmography
AT jiajungwang improvementofleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementintheimpedancecardiographycombinedwiththereflectionphotoplethysmography
AT chunhungsu improvementofleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementintheimpedancecardiographycombinedwiththereflectionphotoplethysmography
AT dachuancheng improvementofleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementintheimpedancecardiographycombinedwiththereflectionphotoplethysmography