Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether objective gait test scores obtained using a tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective improvement in gait as determined by the patient after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient undergoing CEA for ipsilateral internal carotid artery...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6590 |
_version_ | 1797547534872215552 |
---|---|
author | Tatsuhiko Takahashi Shunrou Fujiwara Suguru Igarashi Toshihiko Ando Kohei Chida Masakazu Kobayashi Kenji Yoshida Takahiro Koji Yoshitaka Kubo Kuniaki Ogasawara |
author_facet | Tatsuhiko Takahashi Shunrou Fujiwara Suguru Igarashi Toshihiko Ando Kohei Chida Masakazu Kobayashi Kenji Yoshida Takahiro Koji Yoshitaka Kubo Kuniaki Ogasawara |
author_sort | Tatsuhiko Takahashi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The purpose of the present study was to determine whether objective gait test scores obtained using a tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective improvement in gait as determined by the patient after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient undergoing CEA for ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis determined whether their gait was subjectively improved at six months after CEA when compared with preoperatively. Gait testing using a tri-axial accelerometer was also performed preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Twelve (15%) of 79 patients reported subjectively improved gait. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differences between pre- and postoperative test values in stride time, cadence, and ground floor reaction for detecting subjectively improved gait were 0.995 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.945–1.000), 0.958 (95%CI, 0.887–0.990), and 0.851 (95%CI, 0.753–0.921), respectively. Cut-off points for value differences in detecting subjectively improved gait were identical to mean −1.7 standard deviation (SD) for stride time, mean +1.6 SD for cadence, and mean +0.4 SD for ground floor reaction of control values from normal subjects. Objective gait test scores obtained using the tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective gait improvements after CEA. When determining significant postoperative improvements in gait using a tri-axial accelerometer, optimal cut-off points for each test value can be defined. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T14:45:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-03c9343b1cb14018bbd92ded6de797fd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1424-8220 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T14:45:26Z |
publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sensors |
spelling | doaj.art-03c9343b1cb14018bbd92ded6de797fd2023-11-20T21:23:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-11-012022659010.3390/s20226590Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid EndarterectomyTatsuhiko Takahashi0Shunrou Fujiwara1Suguru Igarashi2Toshihiko Ando3Kohei Chida4Masakazu Kobayashi5Kenji Yoshida6Takahiro Koji7Yoshitaka Kubo8Kuniaki Ogasawara9Department of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanThe purpose of the present study was to determine whether objective gait test scores obtained using a tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective improvement in gait as determined by the patient after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient undergoing CEA for ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis determined whether their gait was subjectively improved at six months after CEA when compared with preoperatively. Gait testing using a tri-axial accelerometer was also performed preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Twelve (15%) of 79 patients reported subjectively improved gait. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differences between pre- and postoperative test values in stride time, cadence, and ground floor reaction for detecting subjectively improved gait were 0.995 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.945–1.000), 0.958 (95%CI, 0.887–0.990), and 0.851 (95%CI, 0.753–0.921), respectively. Cut-off points for value differences in detecting subjectively improved gait were identical to mean −1.7 standard deviation (SD) for stride time, mean +1.6 SD for cadence, and mean +0.4 SD for ground floor reaction of control values from normal subjects. Objective gait test scores obtained using the tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective gait improvements after CEA. When determining significant postoperative improvements in gait using a tri-axial accelerometer, optimal cut-off points for each test value can be defined.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6590carotid endarterectomygaittri-axial accelerometerstride timecadenceground floor reaction |
spellingShingle | Tatsuhiko Takahashi Shunrou Fujiwara Suguru Igarashi Toshihiko Ando Kohei Chida Masakazu Kobayashi Kenji Yoshida Takahiro Koji Yoshitaka Kubo Kuniaki Ogasawara Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy Sensors carotid endarterectomy gait tri-axial accelerometer stride time cadence ground floor reaction |
title | Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_full | Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_short | Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_sort | comparison of subjective and objective assessments on improvement in gait function after carotid endarterectomy |
topic | carotid endarterectomy gait tri-axial accelerometer stride time cadence ground floor reaction |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tatsuhikotakahashi comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT shunroufujiwara comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT suguruigarashi comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT toshihikoando comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT koheichida comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT masakazukobayashi comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT kenjiyoshida comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT takahirokoji comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT yoshitakakubo comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy AT kuniakiogasawara comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy |