Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether objective gait test scores obtained using a tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective improvement in gait as determined by the patient after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient undergoing CEA for ipsilateral internal carotid artery...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatsuhiko Takahashi, Shunrou Fujiwara, Suguru Igarashi, Toshihiko Ando, Kohei Chida, Masakazu Kobayashi, Kenji Yoshida, Takahiro Koji, Yoshitaka Kubo, Kuniaki Ogasawara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6590
_version_ 1797547534872215552
author Tatsuhiko Takahashi
Shunrou Fujiwara
Suguru Igarashi
Toshihiko Ando
Kohei Chida
Masakazu Kobayashi
Kenji Yoshida
Takahiro Koji
Yoshitaka Kubo
Kuniaki Ogasawara
author_facet Tatsuhiko Takahashi
Shunrou Fujiwara
Suguru Igarashi
Toshihiko Ando
Kohei Chida
Masakazu Kobayashi
Kenji Yoshida
Takahiro Koji
Yoshitaka Kubo
Kuniaki Ogasawara
author_sort Tatsuhiko Takahashi
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the present study was to determine whether objective gait test scores obtained using a tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective improvement in gait as determined by the patient after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient undergoing CEA for ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis determined whether their gait was subjectively improved at six months after CEA when compared with preoperatively. Gait testing using a tri-axial accelerometer was also performed preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Twelve (15%) of 79 patients reported subjectively improved gait. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differences between pre- and postoperative test values in stride time, cadence, and ground floor reaction for detecting subjectively improved gait were 0.995 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.945–1.000), 0.958 (95%CI, 0.887–0.990), and 0.851 (95%CI, 0.753–0.921), respectively. Cut-off points for value differences in detecting subjectively improved gait were identical to mean −1.7 standard deviation (SD) for stride time, mean +1.6 SD for cadence, and mean +0.4 SD for ground floor reaction of control values from normal subjects. Objective gait test scores obtained using the tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective gait improvements after CEA. When determining significant postoperative improvements in gait using a tri-axial accelerometer, optimal cut-off points for each test value can be defined.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:45:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03c9343b1cb14018bbd92ded6de797fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:45:26Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-03c9343b1cb14018bbd92ded6de797fd2023-11-20T21:23:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-11-012022659010.3390/s20226590Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid EndarterectomyTatsuhiko Takahashi0Shunrou Fujiwara1Suguru Igarashi2Toshihiko Ando3Kohei Chida4Masakazu Kobayashi5Kenji Yoshida6Takahiro Koji7Yoshitaka Kubo8Kuniaki Ogasawara9Department of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba 028-3695, Iwate, JapanThe purpose of the present study was to determine whether objective gait test scores obtained using a tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective improvement in gait as determined by the patient after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient undergoing CEA for ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis determined whether their gait was subjectively improved at six months after CEA when compared with preoperatively. Gait testing using a tri-axial accelerometer was also performed preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Twelve (15%) of 79 patients reported subjectively improved gait. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differences between pre- and postoperative test values in stride time, cadence, and ground floor reaction for detecting subjectively improved gait were 0.995 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.945–1.000), 0.958 (95%CI, 0.887–0.990), and 0.851 (95%CI, 0.753–0.921), respectively. Cut-off points for value differences in detecting subjectively improved gait were identical to mean −1.7 standard deviation (SD) for stride time, mean +1.6 SD for cadence, and mean +0.4 SD for ground floor reaction of control values from normal subjects. Objective gait test scores obtained using the tri-axial accelerometer can detect subjective gait improvements after CEA. When determining significant postoperative improvements in gait using a tri-axial accelerometer, optimal cut-off points for each test value can be defined.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6590carotid endarterectomygaittri-axial accelerometerstride timecadenceground floor reaction
spellingShingle Tatsuhiko Takahashi
Shunrou Fujiwara
Suguru Igarashi
Toshihiko Ando
Kohei Chida
Masakazu Kobayashi
Kenji Yoshida
Takahiro Koji
Yoshitaka Kubo
Kuniaki Ogasawara
Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
Sensors
carotid endarterectomy
gait
tri-axial accelerometer
stride time
cadence
ground floor reaction
title Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
title_full Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
title_short Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments on Improvement in Gait Function after Carotid Endarterectomy
title_sort comparison of subjective and objective assessments on improvement in gait function after carotid endarterectomy
topic carotid endarterectomy
gait
tri-axial accelerometer
stride time
cadence
ground floor reaction
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6590
work_keys_str_mv AT tatsuhikotakahashi comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT shunroufujiwara comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT suguruigarashi comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT toshihikoando comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT koheichida comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT masakazukobayashi comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT kenjiyoshida comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT takahirokoji comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT yoshitakakubo comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy
AT kuniakiogasawara comparisonofsubjectiveandobjectiveassessmentsonimprovementingaitfunctionaftercarotidendarterectomy