Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018
Aim. To work out the unified model for description of coloproctological service at the level of federal district.Material and methods. The study is the summary analysis of data from the annual statistical observation “The Report of the Chief Coloproctologist of the Russian Federal District” in 2016–...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
IRBIS LLC
2020-11-01
|
| Series: | Фармакоэкономика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/416 |
| _version_ | 1797878847399526400 |
|---|---|
| author | A. V. Veselov V. V. Omelyanosvkiy Yu. A. Shelygin A. V. Vitko V. N. Kashnikov N. V. Tashkinov T. V. Shkurko A. I. Moskalev A. A. Serbina |
| author_facet | A. V. Veselov V. V. Omelyanosvkiy Yu. A. Shelygin A. V. Vitko V. N. Kashnikov N. V. Tashkinov T. V. Shkurko A. I. Moskalev A. A. Serbina |
| author_sort | A. V. Veselov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim. To work out the unified model for description of coloproctological service at the level of federal district.Material and methods. The study is the summary analysis of data from the annual statistical observation “The Report of the Chief Coloproctologist of the Russian Federal District” in 2016–2018. The analysis included the following stages: the estimation of staff situation; the assessment of the main parameters of out- and inpatient coloproctological care in 2018 in the Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD) and in its federal subjects.Results. Staff number of doctors in federal subjects of the FEFD did not change significantly in 2016-2018, it was 0.7 per 100 thousand population. An extremely low availability of outpatient consultation of coloproctologist in all federal subjects of FEFD was found (550.2 per 100 thousand population vs 3000 per 100 thousand population in Russian Federation). The incidence of colonoscopy is the lowest among all Federal Districts of Russia as well – 5.5%. A mean number of endoscopists is above 7.0 per 100 thousand population, which can be considered as the minimal threshold parameter. The total average staffing of endoscopists in the far Eastern Federal district was 86.0% in 2016, 87.3% – in 2017, 85.8% – in 2018. The staffing situation improved in Khabarovsk Territory and in Sakhalin Region while other federal subjects showed negative trend.Conclusion. The analyzed parameters can be considered as an objective tool for the assessment of coloproctological care efficacy. In the FEFD it needs further development. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T02:39:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-03d141d48eb64c0bb6ffef7d376ec799 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2070-4909 2070-4933 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T02:39:40Z |
| publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
| publisher | IRBIS LLC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Фармакоэкономика |
| spelling | doaj.art-03d141d48eb64c0bb6ffef7d376ec7992023-03-13T07:48:17ZrusIRBIS LLCФармакоэкономика2070-49092070-49332020-11-0113324025010.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2020.038307Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018A. V. Veselov0V. V. Omelyanosvkiy1Yu. A. Shelygin2A. V. Vitko3V. N. Kashnikov4N. V. Tashkinov5T. V. Shkurko6A. I. Moskalev7A. A. Serbina8Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology; Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare and Medical Management of the Moscow City Health DepartmentCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate EducationRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate EducationFar-East State Medical University; Ministry of Health of the Khabarovsk regionRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for ColoproctologyFar-East State Medical UniversityRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology; Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare and Medical Management of the Moscow City Health DepartmentRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for ColoproctologyRyzhikh National Medical Research Centre for ColoproctologyAim. To work out the unified model for description of coloproctological service at the level of federal district.Material and methods. The study is the summary analysis of data from the annual statistical observation “The Report of the Chief Coloproctologist of the Russian Federal District” in 2016–2018. The analysis included the following stages: the estimation of staff situation; the assessment of the main parameters of out- and inpatient coloproctological care in 2018 in the Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD) and in its federal subjects.Results. Staff number of doctors in federal subjects of the FEFD did not change significantly in 2016-2018, it was 0.7 per 100 thousand population. An extremely low availability of outpatient consultation of coloproctologist in all federal subjects of FEFD was found (550.2 per 100 thousand population vs 3000 per 100 thousand population in Russian Federation). The incidence of colonoscopy is the lowest among all Federal Districts of Russia as well – 5.5%. A mean number of endoscopists is above 7.0 per 100 thousand population, which can be considered as the minimal threshold parameter. The total average staffing of endoscopists in the far Eastern Federal district was 86.0% in 2016, 87.3% – in 2017, 85.8% – in 2018. The staffing situation improved in Khabarovsk Territory and in Sakhalin Region while other federal subjects showed negative trend.Conclusion. The analyzed parameters can be considered as an objective tool for the assessment of coloproctological care efficacy. In the FEFD it needs further development.https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/416coloproctological service organizationcolorectal cancerendoscopic servicestaffing support |
| spellingShingle | A. V. Veselov V. V. Omelyanosvkiy Yu. A. Shelygin A. V. Vitko V. N. Kashnikov N. V. Tashkinov T. V. Shkurko A. I. Moskalev A. A. Serbina Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018 Фармакоэкономика coloproctological service organization colorectal cancer endoscopic service staffing support |
| title | Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018 |
| title_full | Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018 |
| title_fullStr | Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018 |
| title_short | Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018 |
| title_sort | parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far eastern federal district in 2016 2018 |
| topic | coloproctological service organization colorectal cancer endoscopic service staffing support |
| url | https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/416 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT avveselov parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT vvomelyanosvkiy parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT yuashelygin parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT avvitko parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT vnkashnikov parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT nvtashkinov parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT tvshkurko parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT aimoskalev parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 AT aaserbina parametersforevaluatingthemainindicatorsofcoloproctologicalcareintheadultpopulationinthesubjectsofthefareasternfederaldistrictin20162018 |