D’un savoir en crise à un savoir indiscipliné

The testimonies of victims of extreme political violence have taken many forms, from codified versions within the law to artistic expressions. Regardless of its particular form, however, victim testimony has long suffered a precarious status within ‘objectifying’ sciences on account of its subjectiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aurélia Kalisky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bibliothèque Nubar de l'UGAB 2015-06-01
Series:Études Arméniennes Contemporaines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/eac/772
Description
Summary:The testimonies of victims of extreme political violence have taken many forms, from codified versions within the law to artistic expressions. Regardless of its particular form, however, victim testimony has long suffered a precarious status within ‘objectifying’ sciences on account of its subjectivity. Recent developments in the practice of the law and in the writing of history have inaugurated a ‘testimonial turn’, pointing toward a meaningful, if partial, (re)consideration of the epistemological, political and ethical dimensions of victim testimony’s subjectivity. Yet in order for knowledge of the witness to avoid becoming the subject of an instrumentalizing logic or being relegated to the status of a knowledge apart, victim testimony must be considered beyond established disciplinary boundaries. Only a trans-disciplinary approach can open a space for what is proper to the witness, namely a knowledge that is undisciplined.
ISSN:2269-5281
2425-1682