Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis

The article draws a comparison between Russian official and expert foreign policy discourses, focusing on representations of the power balance and relations between major states as the defining features of international system. The author attempts to identify actual and potential contribution of aca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Igor A. Istomin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2016-01-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/618
_version_ 1818616821624864768
author Igor A. Istomin
author_facet Igor A. Istomin
author_sort Igor A. Istomin
collection DOAJ
description The article draws a comparison between Russian official and expert foreign policy discourses, focusing on representations of the power balance and relations between major states as the defining features of international system. The author attempts to identify actual and potential contribution of academics in the Russian foreign policy thinking. Conceptual documents and programme statements of national leadership elevate the notion of 'polycentric world' as a value in itself, which guides national actions on international arena. Although, until the late 2000s its rise was perceived as a welcome, but remote prospect, since the U.S. failures in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as global financial crisis expectations regarding it construction increased. They are accompanied, however, by a more critical appraisal of the concept. The mainstream Russian expert community shares normative appreciation of the polycentric global system as an intrinsic good. It also nourishes expectations of its emergence with almost inevitable certainty. Most of the time, it does not take into account concerns incorporated in the Western IR theories, regarding destabilizing effect of competition between multiple centers of power. The article demonstrates that both Russian political leadership and expert community perceive polycentric system as an international 'great power concert', which is just one and relatively rare form of it. It requires not only virtual parity in capabilities of several players, but also the lack of serious disputes among them. Meanwhile, in the Russia academic community there is a place for a critical tradition, which associates current decentralization of the international system with its chaotization and weakening governance. In recent years this approach gains additional prominence. However, the Russian debates on global order lacks more elaborated discussion regarding sources of power in international system as well as explanation of the binding ties, which would facilitate creation of concert rather than competition among emerging powers.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:55:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03db716c206a45898178649c1ed63a89
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2071-8160
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:55:54Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj.art-03db716c206a45898178649c1ed63a892022-12-21T22:23:53ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602016-01-015052033618Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic AnalysisIgor A. Istomin0Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РоссииThe article draws a comparison between Russian official and expert foreign policy discourses, focusing on representations of the power balance and relations between major states as the defining features of international system. The author attempts to identify actual and potential contribution of academics in the Russian foreign policy thinking. Conceptual documents and programme statements of national leadership elevate the notion of 'polycentric world' as a value in itself, which guides national actions on international arena. Although, until the late 2000s its rise was perceived as a welcome, but remote prospect, since the U.S. failures in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as global financial crisis expectations regarding it construction increased. They are accompanied, however, by a more critical appraisal of the concept. The mainstream Russian expert community shares normative appreciation of the polycentric global system as an intrinsic good. It also nourishes expectations of its emergence with almost inevitable certainty. Most of the time, it does not take into account concerns incorporated in the Western IR theories, regarding destabilizing effect of competition between multiple centers of power. The article demonstrates that both Russian political leadership and expert community perceive polycentric system as an international 'great power concert', which is just one and relatively rare form of it. It requires not only virtual parity in capabilities of several players, but also the lack of serious disputes among them. Meanwhile, in the Russia academic community there is a place for a critical tradition, which associates current decentralization of the international system with its chaotization and weakening governance. In recent years this approach gains additional prominence. However, the Russian debates on global order lacks more elaborated discussion regarding sources of power in international system as well as explanation of the binding ties, which would facilitate creation of concert rather than competition among emerging powers.http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/618международная системавнешнеполитический дискурсэпистемические сообществаполицентричный мироднополярностьисследовательское сообществополитический дискурсвнешняя политикаРоссияСШАцентры силыведущие мировые державысоотношение силinternational systemforeign policy discourseepistemic communitiespolycentric worldunipolarityacademic communitypolitical discourseforeign policyRussiaUSAcenters of powergreat powersbalance of power
spellingShingle Igor A. Istomin
Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
международная система
внешнеполитический дискурс
эпистемические сообщества
полицентричный мир
однополярность
исследовательское сообщество
политический дискурс
внешняя политика
Россия
США
центры силы
ведущие мировые державы
соотношение сил
international system
foreign policy discourse
epistemic communities
polycentric world
unipolarity
academic community
political discourse
foreign policy
Russia
USA
centers of power
great powers
balance of power
title Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis
title_full Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis
title_short Evaluation of tte International System In Russian Official Discourse and Academic Analysis
title_sort evaluation of tte international system in russian official discourse and academic analysis
topic международная система
внешнеполитический дискурс
эпистемические сообщества
полицентричный мир
однополярность
исследовательское сообщество
политический дискурс
внешняя политика
Россия
США
центры силы
ведущие мировые державы
соотношение сил
international system
foreign policy discourse
epistemic communities
polycentric world
unipolarity
academic community
political discourse
foreign policy
Russia
USA
centers of power
great powers
balance of power
url http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/618
work_keys_str_mv AT igoraistomin evaluationoftteinternationalsysteminrussianofficialdiscourseandacademicanalysis