Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study
Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the recontamination time of root canals filled with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques. Methods: Fifty premolars, after biomechanical preparation, were randomly divided into six group...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641694 |
_version_ | 1819092282349977600 |
---|---|
author | Anizabele Milet do Amaral Mercês Carlos Menezes Aguiar Neide Kazue Sakugawa Shinohara Andréa Cruz Câmara Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo |
author_facet | Anizabele Milet do Amaral Mercês Carlos Menezes Aguiar Neide Kazue Sakugawa Shinohara Andréa Cruz Câmara Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo |
author_sort | Anizabele Milet do Amaral Mercês |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the recontamination time of root canals filled with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques. Methods: Fifty premolars, after biomechanical preparation, were randomly divided into six groups according to the obturation technique and the diameter of the gutta-percha point. For leakage evaluation, the roots were mounted in a dual-chamber leakage model system using Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. The Kaplan-Meier and Long-Rank tests were employed at the .05 level of significance. Results: The recontamination was detected between the 13th and 80th days. The active lateral condensation produced less infiltration than the single cone technique, though without statistically significant differences between them. Conclusions: It may be concluded that there was no difference in bacterial penetration between the two root canal filling techniques. The mean root canal contamination time was 67 days. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T22:53:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-03e704c16c0547d78ba67609410c7217 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1677-3225 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T22:53:08Z |
publishDate | 2015-11-01 |
publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-03e704c16c0547d78ba67609410c72172022-12-21T18:47:31ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252015-11-0110110.20396/bjos.v10i1.8641694Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage studyAnizabele Milet do Amaral MercêsCarlos Menezes Aguiar0Neide Kazue Sakugawa Shinohara1Andréa Cruz Câmara2Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo3Federal University of PernambucoFederal University of PernambucoFederal University of PernambucoUniversity of Rio Grande do Sul, PUCRSAim: The aim of the present study was to assess the recontamination time of root canals filled with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques. Methods: Fifty premolars, after biomechanical preparation, were randomly divided into six groups according to the obturation technique and the diameter of the gutta-percha point. For leakage evaluation, the roots were mounted in a dual-chamber leakage model system using Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. The Kaplan-Meier and Long-Rank tests were employed at the .05 level of significance. Results: The recontamination was detected between the 13th and 80th days. The active lateral condensation produced less infiltration than the single cone technique, though without statistically significant differences between them. Conclusions: It may be concluded that there was no difference in bacterial penetration between the two root canal filling techniques. The mean root canal contamination time was 67 days.https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641694Qutta-perchaMicroleakageProTaper gutta-percha master pointProTaper UniversalSingle-cone technique |
spellingShingle | Anizabele Milet do Amaral Mercês Carlos Menezes Aguiar Neide Kazue Sakugawa Shinohara Andréa Cruz Câmara Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Qutta-percha Microleakage ProTaper gutta-percha master point ProTaper Universal Single-cone technique |
title | Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study |
title_full | Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study |
title_short | Comparison of root canals obturated with ProTaper gutta-percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single-cone techniques: a bacterial leakage study |
title_sort | comparison of root canals obturated with protaper gutta percha master point using the active lateral condensation and the single cone techniques a bacterial leakage study |
topic | Qutta-percha Microleakage ProTaper gutta-percha master point ProTaper Universal Single-cone technique |
url | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anizabelemiletdoamaralmerces comparisonofrootcanalsobturatedwithprotaperguttaperchamasterpointusingtheactivelateralcondensationandthesingleconetechniquesabacterialleakagestudy AT carlosmenezesaguiar comparisonofrootcanalsobturatedwithprotaperguttaperchamasterpointusingtheactivelateralcondensationandthesingleconetechniquesabacterialleakagestudy AT neidekazuesakugawashinohara comparisonofrootcanalsobturatedwithprotaperguttaperchamasterpointusingtheactivelateralcondensationandthesingleconetechniquesabacterialleakagestudy AT andreacruzcamara comparisonofrootcanalsobturatedwithprotaperguttaperchamasterpointusingtheactivelateralcondensationandthesingleconetechniquesabacterialleakagestudy AT joseantoniopolidefigueiredo comparisonofrootcanalsobturatedwithprotaperguttaperchamasterpointusingtheactivelateralcondensationandthesingleconetechniquesabacterialleakagestudy |